1/ This is another thread on the Azeri Drone War on Armenia.
I've seen a recent open source analysis of what the Azeri drones are doing to Russian air defense equipment in the hands of Armenia.
2/ The Azeris, with or w/o the assistance of Turk instructors, have killed a number of 9K33 Osa AKM / SA-8 GECKO systems, a number of S-300PS / SA-10B GRUMBLE battery components, and a 9K331 Tor M2KM / SA-15D GAUNTLET.
3/ 1st, there is a claimed GPS/inertial configuration for the larger MAM-L munition that allows it to glide to 14 km range from an unspecified altitude, likely the typical operating altitude for the TB2 of ~18 kft.
4/ 2nd, The TB2's are flying a 100kt figure eight or race track orbit that is putting it's doppler shift speed to something lower than that.
Russian radar computers are filtering out those low speed tracks.
5/ This is not a new problem.
The USS Callaghan (DD-792), a Fletcher-class destroyer, was sunk 29 July 1945 by a 62 kt wood-and-fabric Yokosuka K5Y bi-plane kamikaze at night.
It's Mk37 fire control director/computer for it's radar directed 5" guns were set for 350 kts.
Opps
6/ 3rd, the Turks built TB2 from carbon-fiber composite (CFC) materials that are "lossy"** in the S-band where the SA-8, SA-15 and SA-22 acquisition radars operate.
AKA TB2's have a low but not stealthy radar return.
7/ ** Lossy = "Dielectrics that exhibit electromagnetic loss at microwave frequencies are used extensively in coupled-cavity traveling-wave tubes."
8/ 4th, The Turks are using low power jammers in the S-band to take advantage of #2 & #3 above in both the TB2 & their loitering munitions.
A single block like a 5X Small Size Jamming Transmitter Set was found in a downed Azeri loitering munition.
13/ The US Army needs ground launched AMRAAM at the brigade level in the worst way to deal with medium altitude UAV systems with MAM-C or JDAMS 14 km stand off ranges.
14/14 Loitering munitions with jammers are a 2nd tier military power capability. That is not in the US Army ADA systems design, as far as the open sources I've read.
Why? I don't know.
A small jammer like the US Army's Hexjam can be put in a drone.
Few to none do what you just did there...you show the Japanese side with naval combatants & transports of less than 1,000 tons.
MacArthur Reports has a few such maps.
US Naval historians would rather slit their...
@DWB55 ...wrists in a long warm bath before consulting that resource and almost none have looked at the Japanese & Australian small ships and barges role in the New Guinea campaign.
Doing so is not career enhancing for what it reveals about the WW2 USN narrative.
@DWB55 When you compare your map to this one. You get the air-sea-land context of the Japanese projecting power and guarding sea lines of communication.
Here we are at over 75 years since these combats and it's only now such maps are made?
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter If Sir Henry Phelps Brown & Sheila Hopkins did not address the massive shift in industrialization by electrification covering 1920 - 1965 they have a methodological problem.
The shift from line shaft & belt mechanical power transmission to electrical had huge productivity plus.
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter The widespread use of electric motors small enough to be connected directly to each piece of machinery meant any location with a concrete slab and electrical connections could be a factory.
It also made factories built post 1920 both easier to relocate and harder to destroy.
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter This is why the Soviet Union could relocate it's factories during the German invasion of 1941.
It is also why strategic bombing of German factories did not degrade production like pre-war air power theorists expected.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Structural carry modifications to the missile frame would be where the cost in the SM-6 upgrade would live.
However, compared to the new AIM-260 rocket ramjet design. An air-launched SM-6 would be longer ranged & have a much bigger installed base to work from upon introduction.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Vibration hardening from carrier launch & air carriage is another one of those "not easy" issues.
The AIM-120's carriage on F-16 wing tip hard points in the 1990's & 2000's in the various no-fly zones killed a generation of Slammer war shot dead, dead, dead.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Needs must when the devil drives. The SM-6 needs the delta vee a SM-3's 21 inch diameter booster can provide to get on a reciprocal trajectory for an HGV.
Granted, you are going to need ablative coating for the upper atmosphere as opposed to exoatmosphere flight.
Also granted
@downix@RupprechtDeino ... you are going to have issues with ionization for the radar at high supersonic speed requiring a back up sensor.
And likely the SM-6 stage atop the SM-3 booster will need a AMRAAM type multiple pulse solid rocket motor modification for the HGV intercept profile.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Raytheon's corporate engineering culture is capable of these sorts of modifications rapidly because they have had a stable and long experienced engineering team for the Standard missile that almost no other defense contractor in the world can match.