Note that as hospitals get overwhelmed – as appears to be happening in many regions – the welcome fall in mortality rates we've seen since March may erode. While some of the mortality improvements can be explained by proven benefits of dexamethasone (+/- remdesivir) and... (1/3)
... changing demographics (younger & healthier patients), much of it was due to improvements in hospital care and less overwhelmed MD and nursing staffs. If hospitals get hammered, as they were in NY in the spring, I'd expect an uptick in these mortality rates, sadly. (2/3)
Today's curves (cases top; deaths bottom) show the huge surge in cases & usual lag in deaths (though deaths starting to rise). Whether these curves ultimately rise in sync will hinge on whether hospitals & ICUs can avoid being overwhelmed. Current situation isn't promising. (3/3)
I've gotten a few comments re: remdesivir. @NEJM study tinyurl.com/y2cfubt5 found trend toward benefit (29d mortality=11.4% w/ Rem; 15.2% w/ placebo; hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.03). So we can't say for certain it lowers mortality (didn't reach p<0.05), but it might.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ When I walk or drive around SF, I see evidence of why Covid cases & deaths are the lowest of any big city in the U.S. Masking is near universal, Ubers & Lyfts have their windows wide open, & there are pop-up outdoor eating spaces everywhere.
2/ So, as we enter a 3rd wave that's blanketing the nation, I’ll focus today on San Francisco – specifically the question of whether SF can continue its remarkable Covid success in the face of a national surge, one far more geographically distributed than the prior two waves.
3/ I’ll go out on a limb and say yes… and hope that I’m not proven wrong.
History is with us: when all of California began to surge in June, SF was able to turn it around – whereas much of the rest of CA didn’t and was hit far harder. Ditto for the southern states.
I've flown a few times based on my perception of low – but non-zero – risk. This new report of a big outbreak on a 7-hour Irish flight tinyurl.com/y4fs2y7f doesn't change the overall risk calculus (still very low, if passengers wear masks) but adds to the evidence that...(1/3)
... Covid risk is not evenly distributed. The average risk of an encounter is actually a combo of many, many low-risk encounters, combined a few high-risk ones (super-spreader events) tinyurl.com/yxmykmu9. The problem is that there's no good way to predict super-... (2/3)
... spreader events, so we're stuck with dealing w/ "average" risk. This paper tinyurl.com/y4ce3mwh, which estimates the risk of catching Covid from a 2-hr flight at ~1-in-5000, is still what I go by. Based on it, I won't fly for fun or to a mtg, but will fly if crucial. (3/3)
1/ Yesterday was @UCSF Medicine Grand Rounds– we covered the 3rd wave (w/ particular focus on situation in Wisconsin) and how to assess and manage risk in Covid. The conference (70 min) is available here: tinyurl.com/y2to6y9y Worth watching.
2/ @ 5:00: First, an update by George Rutherford on the current surge. The U.S. is now at >60K cases/d. This map, from @nytimes, shows that while biggest surge is in the Midwest, unlike surges 1 and 2 this is really a national surge, with only a few exceptions (one of them CA).
3/ @ 7:30: In California, “no evidence of a 3rd wave…yet.” “I have a feeling that we’re teetering at the precipice, and we need to be absolutely positively clear that we’re doing everything we can to avoid infection.”
1/ Excellent @washingtonpost piece today on Operation Warp Speed, & its (likely) success in moving us from discovery of a new virus to having one or more safe & effective vaccines available in about a year, God willing. tinyurl.com/yybpgcat
2/ Yes, that’s really me quoted below, praising the Trump administration for OSW's success. Bestowing such praise was not easy, since I agree with @KamalaHarris that our overall Covid response may well be the greatest failure of any presidential administration in U.S. history.
3/ But on this one, the administration has gotten it right. While some will quibble w/ choices of which vaccines to bet on, the investments made seem sound – particularly the choice to offer funds to decrease the risk of the companies’ vaccine development process (“de-risking”)…
Now 7 months into the U.S. pandemic and 3 weeks from the election, everybody is exhausted and overwhelmed. Everyone's new question seems to be, “are you optimistic or pessimistic?” The question is simple; the answer, of course, is complex.
2/ Today, I’ll start with the view from San Francisco – consumed by The Trump Show, it’s been a while since I presented our local data. I’ll then describe the scary surges elsewhere and add my take on the optimist/pessimist question.
3/ First, @UCSFHospitals, we have only 10 Covid patients in hospital & just 2 on vents, both lowest since May (Figure). Test positivity rate @UCSF is ~4% in patients w/ symptoms, 0.5% in asymptomatic pts. In Aug, these # 's were 10% / 1.5%, so a vast improvement in every metric.
Just watched the @TuckerCarlson segment with Trump interview by @DrMarcSiegel. Takeaway: Trump looks good, his voice is strong, no visible shortness of breath, he's finishing sentences without stopping for air. Mental status and judgment seem unchanged from his usual. (1/9)
Siegel actually did a decent interview – asking questions testing recall, along with others that got at judgment and insight (latter included asking about lessons learned from this experience). I'm not a Trump fan but it's hard to make 25th Amendment case from what we saw. (2/9)
And, while Trump is still not completely out of the woods – there's still a small (<5%) chance of a significant setback – with a patient this stable 8 days into the illness, his most likely course is a relatively uneventful recovery. (3/9)