Gov. Pritzker announced IL's COVID-19 metrics and regulations months ago. Mayor Lightfoot knew that if cases continued to rise the state's metrics and regulations would close restaurants to indoor dining. Despite this, she opened bars to indoor partying. blockclubchicago.org/2020/10/28/lig…
As reported by NPR in August: "Public health experts and top health officials, including the Dr. Tony Fauci, say the evidence is abundantly clear: When bars open, infections tend to follow." npr.org/sections/healt…
These are tough times. The federal government has failed to provide the support our small businesses need. In the absence of federal support, our state and local leaders are faced with hard choices.
Mayor Lightfoot had a choice: she could keep bars closed to indoor partying to help keep cases down and the rest of the city open, or she could open bars and add to the spread of COVID-19 and put us on track to a second lockdown. She chose the latter. She should own her choice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chicago Police Superintendent Brown is before the City Council Budget Committee today to testify on CPD's 2021 budget. Under Mayor Lightfoot's #Chi2021budget proposal, CPD takes a greater percentage of the corporate fund, increasing from 37% in 2020 to 39% in 2021. #DefundCPD
From 2014 (the year Laquan McDonald was killed) to 2019, CPD's budget increased by $300 million. During that same time period, mental health services only saw a $3 million increase. #DefundCPD
From 2010 to 2017, Chicago borrowed $709.3 million to cover police misconduct settlements, $1 billion in interest to investors, costing Chicagoans a total of $1.71 billion. #DefundCPD
Two unarmed protesters were shot while attempting to disarm a white supremacist gunman in Kenosha. They were shot while protecting their community from white supremacist violence, during protests against state-sanctioned white supremacist violence.
In the US we call them "race riots," hiding the truth that we have a long history of white supremacist vigilantes working with white supremacist police to commit white supremacist violence and terrorism. It happened in Rhode Island in 1824, in Chicago in 1919, in Tulsa in 1921.
The list of US "race riots" i.e. white supremacist terrorism goes on and on and on. And yet so much reporting on #BlackLivesMatter protests ignores the US's long history of state-sanctioned white supremacist violence - the very issue that BLM is working to end.
Here's a Biden supporter, or an account claiming to be one, arguing that Biden's homophobic comments makes Biden more electable. I would file this comment under homophobic harrassment. But here's the thing: this comment won't lead me to vote for Trump if Biden is the Dem nominee.
Why? Because I have no idea who is behind the account. Because a nasty comment from someone claiming to be a "supporter" of any given candidate should not matter when I decide who I want to be my president. You know what should matter? The candidate's track record and positions.
I do not understand why adults, particularly those claiming to care deeply about policy, are stating that their vote will be swayed by their online interactions with a candidate's alleged supporters. What!?
A thread: In my four years on the Chicago City Council I’ve faced anti-immigrant, anti-Latinx, and homophobic harassment from some of my colleagues.
Until now I’ve remained quiet about the harassment I’ve received because it’s not about me, it’s about us, and I've felt there are much bigger systemic issues that require our energy and attention.
I also know that much of the ire I’ve received is a direct result of my progressive stances & my siding with our grassroots social movements, whether it be #NoCopAcademy, #CPACNow, #EraseTheDatabase, & that the youth at the frontlines of these movements have received much worse.