The #Quran specifies that in 6:68 and then 4:140. It just says "do not sit with" those who mock your faith.
Today, perhaps it could also mean don't buy their publications, don't follow them on social media.
No killing. Not even censorship.
In other words, as I noted before (as in the linked piece) there is absolutely no basis in the Qur'an for attacking blasphemers, even silencing them.
The problem, as in the case of apostasy, only comes from post-Quranic texts - all open to doubt & debate. nytimes.com/2015/01/14/opi…
The key post-Quranic texts relevant to #blasphemy are reports about the killing of certain "satirical #poets" by the Prophet's orders.
But even a careful reading of these texts suggests that the matter then was not mere satire but active enmity in a context of war for survival.
The lesson is what I argue in much more detail in a chapter on #blasphemy in my forthcoming book, "Reopening Muslim Minds: A Return to Reason, Freedom, and Tolerance":
We Muslims should give up "coercive power" to make people respect #Islam - which only makes them disrespect it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I often see hardcore #Sunni accounts condemning the #Shia, for the latter "denigrate the #sahaba," the Prophet's companions.
They can't realize that this is because the Shia have a different version of the history of early Islam.
And the Sunni history is just another version.
Personally, I would not condemn any of the early figures in Islam - but I would not sacralize them either.
#Ali and #Aisha went to war over power. The all glorious sahaba killed each other for power. Obviously this was a very human history, whose full truth we may never know.
Whether you are #Sunni or #Shii, the immediate post-Prophetic Islam isn't too rosy.
It includes coercive wars (on "ridda"), nepotism, tribalism, assassination, and lots of intra-Muslim bloodshed.
So, to say that Islam brought a "perfect political system" isn't convincing.