#MadrasHC disposes of PILs against Vel Yatra which was proposed to be taken by BJP between Nov 6-30 with liberty to BJP TN Unit to challenge Govt rejection of the application made for permission conduct the Yatra.
During the hearing today, AG Vijay Narayan informed Madras HC that the State has decided to reject the application for the conduct of the Vel Yatra in the public interest in view of the COVID-19 Govt orders as well as the threat of a law and order situation
AG Vijay Narayan had added that the State is in the process of finalizing and communicating the reply.
The petitioners had approached HC on apprehensions that the Vel Yatra was being conducted for political mileage and was likely to create communal unrest and spread COVID-19

They pointed out that the Yatra was scheduled to end on Dec 6 when the #babrimasjid demolition took place.
Appearing for BJP State President, L Murugan, Adv V Ragavachari opposed the petitions as premature. He argued that the State ought to hear the applicant first before rejecting permission rather than informing its decision before the Court for the first time.
Ragavachari: Did they hear me at any point of time before taking a conscious decision? I am not going to violate any of the pandemic conditions that they may impose.
The Madras HC Bench of CJ AP Sahi and Justice P Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, however, took note of AG's submission that there was an Oct 31 GO which stated that religious/other congregations would be permitted only after Nov 16, with a maximum of 100 persons participating.
While disposing of the PILs, Court also noted that this GO has not been challenged.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

6 Nov
A virtual seminar titled "Feminist Lawyering: From Invisible To Invincible" organized by the Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum will shortly begin. Image
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising and Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan will be the speakers for the event.
The session begins.
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
#BombayHighCourt will hear the plea of #ArnabGoswami Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV challenging his arrest by Maharashtra Police today.

Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik will begin hearing the plea at 3 pm today.

@republic
@MumbaiPolice Image
Notice was issued in his plea in the previous hearing as the Court was not inclined to grant a hearing unless the Respondents can be heard.

Akshata Naik - the complainant in the FIR of the abetment of suicide case was also impleaded in the plea.

Read: barandbench.com/news/bombay-hi…
Hearing begins.
Read 45 tweets
6 Nov
Delhi High Court begins hearing on Mohit Saraf-Rajiv Luthra dispute #SarafvLuthra #DelhiHC Image
The Court had earlier asked the parties to try mediation to resolve their differences and appointed Senior Advocate Sriram Panchu as the mediator. On Monday, Justice V Kameswar Rao was informed that mediation had failed.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi arguing for Saraf. Speaks about 90-day notice for expulsion from firm.
Read 22 tweets
6 Nov
#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI SA Bobde hears plea filed against Jharkhand Rajya Sabha hopeful Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia @PradeepSonthali against election of sitting RS member Dhiraj Prasad Sahu.

Petition in Supreme Court says Sahu "illegally occupying chair"
Petition seeks orders to Election Commission to submit voting numbers before SC. Claims that Sonthalia had recieved more votes, voter had been disqualified from assembly.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi appears for Sonthalia.
Read 10 tweets
6 Nov
CJI SA Bobde led bench of the #SupremeCourt to pass orders on “segmented” tariffs, plans offered by telecom operators to a targeted slice of their subscribers.

Segmented tariffs are plans offered to users who wish to leave a network as retention sops.

#TRAIvsAitlrtel Image
The plea by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), seeks details from Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea on segmented, or specific, offers made by the telecom companies to their subscribers.
The plea was opposed by telecom companies Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea on the ground that it would violate commercial confidentiality and help rivals poach their subscribers.
@airtelnews @vodafone
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
[Transwoman's plea against exclusion of transgender persons from NCC enrollment] Kerala High Court will hear the matter on Thursday next week.
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Today, the Court queried the Central Government Counsel on why the petitioner's application for enrollment as a female was being denied.

This was unacceptable, especially as the person identified as female and the female category was recognised by the NCC Act.
The Counsel submitted that the NCC's objections were to the fact that she was a transperson, but that he needed further instructions on the exact nature of their objections.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!