That is an important reflection: there is something we, scientists, science communicators, and scientific policymakers, are not doing OK. There should be something we can do for improving the way we tell our stories for reaching people who usually don’t pay attention to Science
An example may be the huge bias we have in social media. Our voice is only listened by few, but we think there are many. Many times we just block someone who thinks slightly diferent to us for a minor detail. I know there are many trolls but we should be open to debate more
And I’m saying this happens between us too. For example, I know that *science accounts* blocked me when I was as crazy trying to make sense of what a #supermoon means, and why I hate the term “super blood blue moon” (e.g. angelrls.wordpress.com/2018/01/30/the… )
There are many trolls/aggressive people in social media. But many times, it often happens to scientists with many followers, we block someone for minor things or for *debating* with us. That increases our ego and makes us appear superior to them, moving them away from Science
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The first #bluemuse@bluemusevlt Science Workshop is starting right now online! 186 astrophysicists around the world discussing the amazing science this new @ESO’s VLT telescope! Thanks @novaric for organising this!
First talk at #bluemuse workshop is by Roland Bacon, who provides a very good overview of the success of MUSE at @ESO’s VLT and gives the context of why deciding to build a blue-optimised Integral Field Unit (IFU) next
Next in #Bluemuse workshop is Johan Richard @novaric providing a project overview of the @bluemusevlt instrument: the 3 top level parameters (blue coverage, medium spectral resolution, field of view of 1.4’ x 1.4’) and some important science cases
Day 5 and last of #ESOz2020 starts with great Cath Trott @CathAstro@ICRAR@ARC_ASTRO3D giving the invited review talk “Measuring the re-ionisation signal”
More cool results shown by Cath Trott @CathAstro@ICRAR@ARC_ASTRO3D during her invited talk at #ESOz2020: studying the Lyman-alpha & 21cm Forests using low-frequency radio observations and galaxy stacking at those frequencies. Outlook slide included. Amazing @mwatelescope !
#ESOz2020 Day 4. Starting at 9am sharp (& me walking around to get the watch movement tick this hour) with Matt Jarvis giving the review talk “Galaxy populations across time and wavelength”
In this talk it has been mentioned again LSST (several times during #ESOz2020 mentioned) but please everyone remember that it is now the “Vera Rubin Observatory” @VRubinObs in honour to this great woman astrophysicist lsst.org/news/vro-press…#WomenInScience
3rd day of #ESOz2020 conference, but I can’t share slides of the first talk as the speaker specifically requested it. Meaning this talk will not be included in my notes.
But I’m still thinking about the request of not tweeting (publicising) your work/research... it has happened to me before (even specifically requested do no write/show anything from their research)... what is the point? Don’t you want to share your work and talk about it?
Day 2 of #ESOz2020 conference. Simon Driver @ICRAR presents a panchromatic view of the Universe. Spectroscopic surveys have to get multiwavelength data, as galaxy evolution cannot be understood if information from x-ray to radio is not available (new #thread)
Simon Driver @ICRAR emphasises that getting the spectra energy distributions (SEDs) of galaxies is key for getting accurate estimations of galaxy properties (e.g. stellar masses, dust, star-formation rates & histories). Some examples provided #ESOz2020
Simon Driver discusses the problem of the mass in galaxies. Where is it? What is the baryon budget of galaxies? #ESOz2020