@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian Because... of Dr. Charles Chapin and his 1910 book: archive.org/details/source…
- In that book Chapin proposed contact infection, a hugely important advance
- He realized importance of infection in close proximity, and usefulness of social distancing to reduce infection
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian - Correctly concludes that ease of infection in close prox. must be due to Flugge's "sprayborne droplets" or "airborne" aerosols
- About airborne: “In air infection, it becomes evident that our knowledge is far too scanty, and that the available evidence is far from conclusive”
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian - But this leaves him with a problem: "It is impossible to teach people to avoid contact infection while they are firmly convinced that the air is the chief vehicle of infection”
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian So: “There is no evidence that [air infection] is is an appreciable factor in the maintenance of most of our common contagious diseases. We are warranted, then, in discarding it as a working hypothesis, and devoting our chief attention to the prevention of contact infection.”
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian - I.e. he turned absence of evidence into evidence of absence
- due to importance of contact infection, this becomes paradigm of epidemiology and ID... till 2020
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian - Despite fierce resistance, Wells and Riley and others manage to show that some diseases are airborne. The most contagious, since easiest to demonstrate (in a very difficult subject)
- Leading to artifact of history being confused w/ law of nature (airborne must be v contagious)
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian When we met with @WHO's personnel and IPC committee in April 6, they were all "Chapinistas."
Little evidence for droplets of surfaces, but aerosols were an extraordinary claim, that required extraordinary evidence. Same level of evidence as for droplets nowhere near enough!
@MackayIM@Lucas_Bolivian@WHO All of that said, I do think that large droplets can transmit disease, if someone coughs or sneezes in someone else's face and scores a "hit". So we should give them *some* attention. But we have to put them on their rightful place, relative to the risk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Hoy el Ministerio de Ciencia de España @CienciaGob ha publicado un informe, en el que participan virólogos, epidemiólogos, expertos de salud pública, ingenieros...
"apoyo sustancial en la comunidad científica a que los aerosoles sean la vía de transmisión dominante…
2/ ...y a que sea la forma más habitual de contagio en eventos de súper-propagación."
"Existe una falta de evidencia que apoye la importancia de la vía de las gotículas, y es bien posible que esta vía haya sido sobreestimada."
3/ Es una gran noticia que España dé un paso hacia delante para alinearse con países que ya reconocieron la transmisión por aerosoles como Alemania, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Reino Unido, y Bélgica.
3/ Y controlar la transmisión por aerosoles no tiene que ser tan difícil ni tan caro, una vez que se explica bien y se hacen una serie de cosas: más actividades al exterior, ajustarse bien la mascarilla sin huecos, ventilar, medir CO2 etc. Detalles aquí:
9. Monitoring ventilation using CO2 levels
9.1. Can we use the CO2 level in a space to estimate whether ventilation is good or bad?
2/ 9.2. Are there some complexities of the relationship between CO2 and infection risk
9.3. How can we use continuous CO2 measurements to determine the right amount of natural ventilation in an indoor space?
9.4. What type of CO2 analyzers can be trusted?
3/ 9.5. Do you recommend measuring and displaying CO2 in all public places?
1/ Esta persona hablando en TVE comete dos errores importantes en la ciencia de la transmisión por aerosoles. Esos dos errores son los que le llevan a concluir que los aerosoles son menos importantes. Los detallo aquí
2/ Primer error: dice que porque el volumen de los aerosoles es menor, tienen menos virus.
Esto es seguramente erróneo: para todas las enfermedades que se ha medido (TB, gripe, sarampión, VRS), los aerosoles concentran la mayoría de los patógenos. Ver: thelancet.com/journals/lanre…
3/ Segundo error. Dice que como los aerosoles se depositan más profundamente en el sistema respiratorio, tienen menor capacidad de infectar.
Confusión: los aerosoles *pueden* penetrar más (las gotas no pueden), pero *la gran mayoría de los aerosoles se depositan en la nariz*
1/ @WHO ADMITS AEROSOL TRANSMISSION IS IMPORTANT (without actually saying it)
This press conference from @mvankerkhove is very useful and maddening at the same time.
She describes measures that ONLY work to control aerosols.
2/ Yet aerosols / airborne ***are not mentioned at all***. It is left mysterious why all those measures work.
Guess what? That is very confusing to people, and then people can't protect themselves well. They don't know how to adapt the recommendations to their situation.
3/ Hear what @c_drosten , Germany's leading virologist and a key advisor to Angela Merkel, had to say about this. Perhaps a reason why Germany is doing better than a lot of other countries?
Hace 6 días @Alejandro_Ibago y yo activamos GoFundMe para recaudar dinero y distribuir medidores de CO2, en distintos países, con el objetivo de concienciar de la importancia de una correcta ventilación para frenar la propagación de COVID-19
2/ Hemos recibido 140 respuestas y no ha sido fácil seleccionar a 25 ganadores
La campaña continua, y enviaremos más si hay mas contribuciones
Hemos llegado, de momento, a 25 medidores (9 que yo aporto + 14 gracias al dinero recaudado + 2 donación de @EspanaAranet)
3/ Los ganadores son:
1. Natalia Rubinstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Raquel Hernández, Getafe, España. 3. Johann Andres Mendez, Bogotá, Colombia. 4. José Betés, Zaragoza, España. 5. Ana Laura Cavatorta, Rosario, Argentina.