For banks first assess the strength of the liability franchise. Not just CASA ratio but total deposits to total liabilities.
A bank can have a low deposit share in liabilities and a high CASA.
Wholesale funding is not good.
Granular deposits are good.
2/
Liability side determines the cost of funds. Lower your cost of fund the lower risk you need to take in lending for the same NIMs (profitability).
Some banks can’t even compete in prime Housing Loans (one of the safest segments) due to high cost of funds.
3/
For most businesses growth is an output of your strategy and quality of service/product.
In lending growth is an input. You decide it (after all you are giving money).
The output is credit cost. That is quality of your underwriting.
4/
In general be wary of anything showing very high credit growth. That’s the easy part.
Historical underwriting performance is only indicative. Look at what segments the banks is lending to.
Secured/MSME/Salaried/BB & below etc.
5/
Loan customers who are also have a liability relationship are usually better.
Asses how frequently the bank will to dilute.
There is reflexivity here. A bank that can dilute at 4X will increase BV per share. One that has to do it at 0.3 will impair it.
6/
Also what according to you are the strongest franchises today?
Would your view have been different 10 years ago?
How many BFSI names have beaten these over that period?
How much capital could you have allocated to these few vs the established franchises?
Think.
7/
I don’t hunt for the next X. I buy the damn X.
8/
Now people will say this bank will be able to follow a certain template (because of new CEO, new strategy etc) and the X valuation will become Y. Hence just buy it.
Don’t.
Businesses & Valuations are more nuanced.
Compare to existing ideas. Assess the opportunity cost.
9/
If you ever have to resort to high growth argument in BFSI you are probably heading for a trap.
Dis: Inv/Biased
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Terry Smith says buy quality companies (you could have bought L’Oréal in 1973 at 240X and beaten the Index).
Munger says pay fair value for wonderful businesses.
Howard Marks is quality agnostic.
So which is it? What do you do?
2/
Terry’s example: You can buy a company with 20% ROIC at 4X and sell 40 years later at 2X book value and still beat another company with 10% ROIC which you buy at 2X and sell at 4X.
He fleetingly mentions that for simplicity all earnings are retained and reinvested.
3/
I don’t know any endeavour where the difference between how easy something looks & how difficult it actually is, is as wide as in Investing (in the context of stock picking).
People across the income/wealth spectrum feel it is easy to pick stocks & multiply their savings. They fall for every racket out there - High Risk-High Return/Small Caps Outperform/Divinations by Drawing Lines/Tips from TV Experts/Option Seminars/Leverage….
1/ The key to knowing when to sell is knowing ‘why you bought it in the first place'.
— Peter Lynch
Either the story has played out or the thesis has been violated or you have found something better.
Let’s examine the case where the stock is performing first.
2/ When you sell depends on what kind of investor you are.
The traits that makes you seek high margin of safety & deep value in your buy decisions will often make you sell early. Those decisions are driven by similar mindsets.
(for the justifiably endangered retail active investor)
👇
1/ To have 10 stocks in your portfolio you probably have to track a 100 companies. These include competitiors of your holdings and potential inclusions.
Every company is telling a story not just about itself, but also about its peers, its customers, its vendors - the economy.
2/ Quaterly results are where you start. Maintain a sheet for each sector with important parameters (value drivers) for each stock and update it quarterly. Some website (@Tijori1)track some of this data, but maintain your own sheet. (“Quarterly Data Sheet”).