Lots of talk (& confusion) today about EU ratification & #Brexit. All you need to know in this short thread.
1. Should you care about EU ratification? Yes. Brexit talks ongoing – but they're only part of the challenge. UK & EU also need time to vote & get ready for change.
2. Who in EU votes on UK-EU FTA? Depends on content of the deal. If:
(i) “EU-only” (areas of EU law only): then approval is needed at EU level (Council & EU Parliament)
(ii) “mixed agreement” (areas of EU & member-state law, like aviation): then approval at EU level *and* in MS
3. What about UK-EU FTA? V likely to be mixed agreement. Member states cd decide to limit ratification to EU level. But seems unlikely: they won’t want to upset their nat/regional parliaments by taking vote away from them. BUT fortunately, MS vote can take place after 2020.
[3bis. UK-EU deal cd be "EU-only". For example, EU-Japan deal was considered EU-only even though it was a mixed agreement; but then again, Commission considered EU-Canada deal an "EU only" deal but MS pushed for it to be a mixed agreement. So who knows].
4. Step-by-step EU vote guide: 1. Council (member states) “sign” agreement (basically say whether they like it) 2. EP votes 3. Council gives consent 4. Member-state ratification (but that can take place AFTER 2020). Deal is “provisionally” applied pending full ratification.
4. But does EP need to vote before 31 Dec? As @StevePeers notes, Council (member states) cd decide to provisionally apply UK-EU deal in absence of EU parliament vote – but they won’t want to.
5. EU Parliament (EP) vote: Ideally, EP would vote in last plenary of this year (w/c 14 Dec). EP cd be recalled for “extraordinary sitting” before end of the yr to vote on UK-EU deal; but no-one wants that at Xmas time.
7. Council vote: No vote as such. But they won’t formally give consent to UK-EU deal until EU Parliament has voted.
8. Member state vote (if required): Ratification can take place after 2020. Council can decide to provisionally apply agreement in areas of EU law pending full ratification. As @StevePeers notes, political declaration already mentions possibility of provisional application.
9. But provisional application (PA) not straightforward: 1. Need to discuss it inside EU & with UK. 2. Not a permanent state either (almost collapsed for EU-Canada when Belgian reg parliament threatened to veto deal). 3. Can be withdrawn unilaterally.
How will #EU react to Cumming’s departure? My hunch: status quo & caution. Short thread:
1. Status quo: Cumming’s departure won’t suddenly lead to a softening of EU state aid position in favour of the UK’s. EU wants a state aid compromise that stands the test of time - not just now but in 5/10 years time. Tonight’s development do not change that.
2. Caution: Cumming’s departure only matters if it gives PM more room for manoeuvre to find a Brexit compromise. But PM makes that call & there is no guarantee of that yet. END.
1. Stable foreign policy outlook: Biden will want to break with an America first foreign policy. Recommit US to multilateral system, fight against climate change & building resilience. UK shares all these priorities.
2. *But* UK must present US with a plan: Biden’s immediate focus will be domestic (bring US together, tackle Covid). Many in Washington have been surprised at how “internally-focused” the UK has been for past 4 yrs with Brexit. They now want to know what Britain will do globally
1. Purpose: protocol designed to prevent a hard border between Ireland and NI: the only way to do that was to agree a UK-wide backstop (which PM rejected) OR ensure greater alignment between NI and Ireland & move admin procedures to the Irish Sea. PM negotiated the latter
2. Length: The protocol will apply even if there is an FTA – it’s just that certain provisions could be superseded (i.e. improved) by FTA. This is why FTA talks are so important. And why any attempt to unpick WA cd seriously jeopardise them.
Sorry to be a pedant but joint committee role isn’t to identity which GB products are at risk; rather it agrees which products are *NOT* at risk of flowing into EU market. If JC can’t agree, then *all* GB products entering NI will be deemed at risk (with some exceptions)
Sounds the same, but it’s not. UK worried that JC won’t come to an agreement. But as @BBCkatyaadler points out, EU want a deal & prepared to move. EU understands UK asks. Talks ongoing (and until this wk, were going well on the whole). No agreement yet. Just way negotiations go
Meanwhile other aspects of protocol cd be addressed (and therefore requirements lessened) in FTA. But EU has said it will only agree to FTA if *UK* sticks to its commitments under withdrawal agreement.
True that not all previous national security advisers (NSA) were "steeped in the security world" but they had worked on security files before taking over the post:
1. Inevitable: Most in EU think some form of extension is now inevitable. PM is in intensive care, chief negotiators are self-isolating. It is not clear negotiations will happen virtually - and lots of worry that businesses won't be able to adapt both to COVID & new UK-EU regime.
2. Process: it will be up to the UK-EU joint committee (JC) to decide terms (length, ££ contributions to EU budget, etc) by 1 July. EU must also secure member states' approval *before* it agrees to anything in the joint committee. Talks in JC and in EU27 won't be straightforward.