I just want to say: Substack is awesome. It is what you make it, the voices on Substack are incredibly diverse, anyone can start one and you can easily run your content through editors or operate a traditional media company on the platform. It is so disheartening to see the hate.
The barrier of entry to launch something on Substack is low. So whether you're Glenn Greenwald or someone just starting their writing career you could easily produce bad content if you approach it the wrong way. But that's true of basically any media or writing endeavor.
I am absolutely baffled to see so many people hating on a platform that is creating more financial opportunities for writers and reporters at a time when the media industry is sucking air. Just because some ppl you don't like are publishing there? Get over it. This is huge!
I launched my Substack newsletter 15 months ago -- and there were hundreds of well-established writers there already. The idea that Substack = the ppl in the news recently is just silly. You can find anything you like on Substack, and writers across the idealogical spectrum.
I'm not saying your jokes aren't funny. Some of them are. But the genuine backlash to a platform making sustainable journalism possible for so many unemployed writers is honestly so damn sad. Where's the camaraderie in the media world? Substack is a great addition. I'm grateful.
And yeah, you can subscribe to my newsletter, punk. tangle.substack.com/about
One other thing, because the more I read the more annoyed I am by this (and then I'll go back to political coverage)

Every single time I hang out with journos and media people, the conversation inevitably gets into how broken the incentive structure is — clickbait, ads, etc...
It always comes up. Americans recognize this too. The Substack team actually did something about it. They didn't just complain -- they tried to create something to fix it, and it's going really, really well! 250,000 paying subscribers well! Maybe pause to think about that.
All the breath spent complaining about pop up ads, sensationalism and clickbait... platforms like Substack offer a legitimate antidote to that crap when used properly. So maybe embracing it and improving it is the move, not dunking on it cause you read something you didn't like.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Isaac Saul

Isaac Saul Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ike_Saul

17 Nov
The state board isn't going to follow suit, but the Trump campaign's baseless claims of a fraudulent election have polluted enough brains to actually undermine the integrity of an election he lost by 150,000 votes. It's really shameful.
A lot of people asking how I know this: because the state board is not susceptible to this kind of nonsense the way the county board in Wayne apparently is. They've made it quite clear already: washingtonpost.com/politics/michi… Image
And, for whatever it's worth, Biden actually doesn't need Michigan to win the election (he'd have 290 EVs without it) -- not that it should even come to that, but that's how not close this election is
Read 4 tweets
16 Nov
No joke, the Trump campaign has ***LITERALLY*** dropped allegations of not being able to observe the vote count in Pennsylvania. They revised their lawsuit: washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
Rudy says they have moved the allegations lower in the filing — if this WaPo report is wrong that they are the same claims, I imagine they will get excoriated as they did in Bucks, Montgomery, and pretty much everywhere else
Point being: removing them probably would have been smart, given how similar allegations have not held up anywhere else in PA or across the country.
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
1/ I hate to say this, but I think something people are really underestimating is how far Trump has driven many of his supporters into the deep end — and how little even him “graciously conceding” will calm down 10% or so of the country, even when he does concede (which he will)
2/ One of the first inklings of this was the debate with Kirsten Walker, when Trump clearly felt she was being fair and even complimented her, but his supporters thought she was overtly biased and totally unfair.
3/ It’s been very obvious in other places too, though. QAnon is an example that’s quite known to everyone — where Trump is no longer “driving” but his supporters are. They made the theory and goaded/pushed him into it, not the other way around.
Read 12 tweets
5 Nov
1/ ALRIGHT Y'ALL. ELECTION FRAUD DEBUNKING MEGA THREAD. I’m following claims of fraud and looking into them. I think I’ve solved most now. Nothing is holding up under any scrutiny so far so I’m making a thread to track in one place. Please RT! #ElectionResults2020 #Election2020
2/ By far the most viral of these claims is the video of officials in Detroit papering up/boarding up the windows inside their polling center in Michigan. This, admittedly, was a bizarre sight. But was 100% explainable and was the right thing to do.
3/ Officials rightly blocked the windows when crowds came inside and began trying to film ballots. Poll watchers EXCEEDED THE LIMIT INSIDE. This is not legal - you can’t barge in and film who ppl voted for. OF COURSE, there were *134 REPUBLICAN POLL WATCHERS* inside the room.
Read 380 tweets
4 Nov
Could Fox News Decision Desk call this election before midnight tonight? They have AZ, WI, and they'll call Michigan soon. Once we get another Nevada batch (later today) it will likely be over. Would be pretty wild if they are first. #Election2020
Nevada now saying they will announce results tomorrow. PA vote count is still coming in, and the Fox News Decision Desk has the same data Wasserman, Cohn, etc. do. It's all numbers, and I could see them calling PA (and thus the election) before midnight.
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
1/ YOUR DUMB MAPS THREAD -- here are the different kinds of maps I'm seeing out there, and what they mean to me.

Map #1: the safe bet I'd bet my actual money on (the polls are basically right, nothing really interesting happens, I am a nerd and love data) Image
2/ Map #2: The Trump upset map. If Trump is going to win, this is probably how he does it. (I am a pragmatic Trump supporter who really wants to see a path for him and this is the path I see) Image
3/ Map #3: The Biden crushing map. If the polls are wrong, but underestimating Biden, we quickly head toward this outcome. (I am a diehard Democrat who has aneurysms because of Trump and this is my optimistic hope for election night) Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!