Astounding to see how #Labour has acted in three prejudicial ways that challenge law:
1. Timing. Many cases take *years*. One day if you're privileged.
2. Case subject. This case clearly about #antisemitism, even if technically not. One rule *again* on this, another elsewhere.
1. Timing. Many cases take *years*. One day if you're privileged.
2. Case subject. This case clearly about #antisemitism, even if technically not. One rule *again* on this, another elsewhere.
3. Treatment. This a bit more arguable, but there are signs of backroom dealing.
They have just been found to have *broken the law* *multiple times* on all these fronts. Yet they do it again!
They have just been found to have *broken the law* *multiple times* on all these fronts. Yet they do it again!
These people are just total amateurs with no understanding of how even a medium-sized public body or private company would act in three circumstances. Just burning through reputation, credit and cash. Hopeless.
How's this case going to look up before the EHRC again, or (worse) in a courtroom, or when the new indy complaints body looks at all the emails? You complete jokers. Speaks to a fundamental unseriousness. Should be nowhere near power. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
