This is the inside story of how a group of journalists, optimists, academics and hundreds of volunteers built @COVID19Tracking project to tell the U.S. how the pandemic is evolving.
The folks at @COVID19Tracking, including @alexismadrigal@kissane and many others, invited me in to look under the hood, hang out in their Slack, do some data entry, and generally interview anyone I wanted. It was incredibly trusting, and I can't thank everyone there enough.
I'll share here some observations that are in the piece:
One thing that really surprised me was the lack of politics/political discourse. The volunteers -- and they're almost all volunteers -- are very, very much about the data and getting the numbers right.
To the extent that there's any lament or anger (and I asked everyone if they had any), it's *incredibly* earnest. They're upset about data-transparency standards. Or about weak IT pipelines between local/state/federal health depts. (And they're mad about it in a v polite way.)
The other sense you get from talking to the volunteers and volunteers-turned-staff is that this is kind of what the Internet could have been: A bunch of curious, technically competent (or just very willing) people who came together online to build something for the public good.
There are journalists like @alexismadrigal + @yayitsrob, editor-community-tech(ish)-defy description people like @kissane, and then everyone from band tour managers, students, librarians, academics, etc.
And I really cannot emphasize enough the overriding sense of *niceness* that pervades the place. Any conversation w/ somebody who has been there a long time returns, at some point, to the culture they have.
There is, also, a sense of tiredness. These people have been doing this for a while, and keep doing it, but also wonder... why they are still having to:
“We just sort of figured, of course the CDC would put out this information,” Madrigal says. “But it just never happened.”
The CDC actually does *have* much of this info, as does HHS. But it's very hard to find, presented messily, and in some cases kept private for the gov't.
It's also pretty clear that CDC wasn't built to respond to a U.S.-wide outbreak of a new disease:
To be fair here -- everyone I've ever spoken to at CDC is 1) very kind, 2) very smart, 3) wants to get this right.
But they don't seem to have the tools in hand or the organization culture to do it.
Anyways, it's been a very fun week for publishing stories about the pandemic that are not just deeply depressing! I coulda written 6,000 words about @COVID19Tracking, but I'm pretty sure @amandakhurley might not have loved that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lysol's parent, @discoverRB, is on track to make 35 million cans a month in the North American market. Their usual max -- running 7 day a week, 24 hours a day, is 10 million.
Some good news: There are signs #Covid19 is getting less deadly for hospitalized patients as doctors gain experience and a handful of new drugs have come online bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
This is, to be clear, about *individual* risk. How many people get seriously ill or die at the country will still depend largely on the rate of spread. For that to go down, it's public health measures and a vaccine. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
That's because, as @FayCortez wrote here, it's very, very, very difficult to come up with *cures* for viruses. The best bets are supportive care, etc: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The Trump administration's top health spokesman has deleted his personal account, after a string of late-night posts in which he appeared to call for tear-gassing reporters and used some salty language while arguing online. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
(deleted earlier tweet in it w/ typo in description of Caputo's role)
BREAKING: Vaccine makers are planning a public statement to push back on pressure on the FDA: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The effort is shaping up as a joint statement from the leading companies developing Covid-19 vaccines, including Pfizer, Moderna, Glaxo, Sanofi, J&J and others, @langreth
reports.
"No company wants to have anything approved but under the strictest standards, the gold standard at the FDA," said the former head of BIO @JimGreenwood bloomberg.com/news/articles/…