Who are the US religious right orgs seeking to influence the sex and gender debates?

This analysis from @openDemocracy is interesting (but not evidence of funding to UK gender dissidents)

Clip below is orgs tagged "anti-LGBT" spending in Europe, 2018

Some observations:

1) No gender critical campaigns or legal crowdfunders are getting funding from these organisations.

Crowdfunders are anonymous of course. This is what mine looks like - mainly small donations from lots of people.
2) The total is not that big $2.8m (£2.1m)

...for the whole of Europe.

(and around $7m for the world outside US)

By comparison Stonewall's annual budget is £8m, including £3m from the Diversity Champions programmes with employers, universities and schools
3) Calling this "dark money" is shoddy.

What the researchers did here is look at the US Foundations Form 990s (ie. public financial reports) and added up the regional expenditures.
This is no more "dark money" than the international funding that Stonewall gets (or indeed that Open Democracy gets).

As i used to argue in my old job, making cheap points by calling stuff you don't like "illicit" is a bad idea if you value open democracy and the rule of law
4) How does it compare to funding for gender identity?

I had a look at Arcus's Form 990

This one foundation spent $0.75m on LGBT projects in Europe in 2018

(interestingly, 70% has a religious focus)

According to @LGBTfunders global philanthropic and public LGBT funding in 2018 was $297m

The vast majority of this is in North America with about $23m annually spend across Europe and $31m on international projects

@ILGAWORLD gets over $5m
These are the top funders in Western Europe.

Number one by a long way is the UK National Lottery.
@GATEOrg has funding to study the (unfunded) gender critical groups of the UK.

(hey @MauroCabralG : I've done the job for you: gender-dissidents.net - can I invoice for the job? )
NB: This is not an argument against funding for LGB&T projects (nor against the religious right funding what they want)

In a democracies letting people do what they want w their money, while having checks & balances about the influence of money is what we should do
Perhaps most important to note is that LGBT funding is only 31c in every $100 of private foundations

(and funding by Open Democracy's list of anti-LGBT orgs is only around 1c in every $100 of private foundations)

The big influence on the the global debate is the other $99.68
Does this funding come with strings and informal expectations that grantees won't challenge the "trans women are women" dogma?

@openDemocracy is funded by big foundations that are committed to open democracy, but also to the US progressive view that TWAW opendemocracy.net/en/supporters/
I wonder if they would host a story about what UK gender critical women (unfunded or influenced by the US religious right) are actually concerned about?


@maryftz @ClaireProvost @sunny_hundal (#pitch)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

23 Nov
More "dark money" accusations. Image
Using Crowdjustice page to make accusation of funding by "anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-assisted dying US hate groups" Image
And to call someone (I think he means me) "a provocateur" arguing "for her right to misgender" Image
Read 4 tweets
22 Nov
This conversation between @BretWeinstein and @DouglasKMurray is interesting - both for the visitor-local conversation on what's happening in Portland (it's really bad) and for the liberal-conservative discussion
There is an interesting tension between Murray's individualist view about liberty & responsibility & Weinstein's evolutionary lens. Murray keeps rejecting "we" talk (we fucked up etc) & Weinstein makes the case for understanding history as emergent systems where there is "we"
There is a really interesting (to me) bit from 1:22 where Weinstein is talking about incarceration rates of black men and impact on the bargaining power of women in relationships, & then on children. Where Murray says but not all uncommitted dads are incarcerated...
Read 6 tweets
20 Nov
This from my local police is disturbing. The interviews w the two young people, Jo & Kaitlyn from 3:20

How can it be in the interests of vulnerable young people to tell them they were "born in the wrong body"?

And that anyone who does not see these two as women hates them?
The support group helps young people feel like they are 'not alone' while telling them they are outcasts and raising the stakes

...telling them that "who they are" is a person of the opposite sex, that people have "died for believing who they are": the world is hostile.
"the support group has done a world of good for me....it helped me feel like i was not alone. I've grown in confidence. I've helped people. The group does a good job at helping people who need to feel normal and feel like they are not alone. All we want is to be accepted in life"
Read 13 tweets
19 Nov
The Gender Dissidents Survey Results are here!

In the summer I asked people to fill in an online survey about why they were concerned about the push to replace sex with gender identity in laws and polices.

More than 700 people completed the survey over the course of a couple of weeks
They were 90 % women, 80% left wing, two-thirds parents, mainly non-religious, almost a quarter LGB

Read 8 tweets
18 Nov
Stonewall is keen on branding people "bigots" & denying them employment.

I wonder if Nancy also want gender critical civil servants and judges fired?
This is what the independent report on interpreters actually says.

Suggests there is an issue here - belief, tradition, training, language?

Interpreters must be able & willing to do the job

The report emphasises general training and quality assurance.

Stonewall jumps straight to they are bigots and must be denied employment
Read 7 tweets
18 Nov
Reed & Castiglia sound just like the kind of Professors you would want at university, and the axioms and their letter sing.

Its amazing just how surprising and unusual it is now to read grown ups using wit, speaking clearly & standing their ground to defend open conversation
Which makes their final recantation all the more heart-breaking (& I read Jane's thread one-by-one as she posted.... i didn't see the ending coming)

I talk to administrators, shop floor workers, police officers trying to defend themselves against these same totalitarian demands
We don't all have the language and space to express ourselves as the Professors, and the arguments on Twitter are not as elegant, but perhaps we don't have the same crushing incentives to fall back into line.

Or perhaps we do and enough of us refuse to anyway.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!