For the full month of August
2020 6781
2019 6829
2018 6791
2017 6824
2016 7005
2015 6712
'15-'19 avg. 6832
Sweden total deaths
For full month of September
2020 6580
2019 6674
2018 6803
2017 6762
2016 6728
2015 6916
'15-'19 avg. 6777
Sweden total deaths
For full month of October
2020 6975
2019 7338
2018 7276
2017 7415
2016 7357
2015 7147
'15-'19 avg. 7307
A certain % of people alive on Jan 1 of any year are expected to die by Dec 31 of that year. In years of heightened flu activity when a flu wave occurs over a few week period, many of the expected deaths will "bunch up" during the flu wave, followed by below-normal mortality...
...Data loves to hug its baseline, a concept never conveyed in the Pro-Panic side's crazed "Fear The Virus and Only the Virus/; drumbeating. Deaths of those closest to death bunching up during a flu wave, and then fading below normal, tends to even things out.
The full-year 2020 all-cause death total for Sweden **as a % of the total population alive Jan. 1** will be about +0.04% over late-2010s trendline expected level.
Statistically all of this +0.04% deaths in Sweden in 2020 are elderly people (90% age 70+). Statistically no children have died (influenza or other flu viruses are more dangerous to children than Wuhan-Corona).
The impact of more working-age people dying rounds to +0.00%.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The picture we have is that Wuhan-Corona as an indisputably severe flu wave, but just as indisputably as one within the normal-historical range for such flu waves. A Sweden born in 1957 has lived through 13 comparable severe flu waves.
(Excesses rounded to the hundredth place and calculated on +/- two year averages.) (From Swedish Health Ministry and Eurostat.)
They "used an 'all of the above' strategy to steal the 2020 presidential election...includ[ing] old-fashioned ballot stuffing, pay-per-vote, ballot harvesting, dead voters, double-voting, illegal voting, and intimidation of voting officials and volunteers."
-- Kenneth R Timmerman
He is a longtime investigative journalist (@KenTimmerman)
It seems the death rate of people with The Virus on an all-population basis for a first-world population is 0.03% to 0.25%, depending on which subdemographics it hits disproportionately and on baseline age and health of the community.
0.03%-0.25% deaths of people with the virus,
but
(1) There is no virus in history that 100% of people get. Expansion then end with #herdimminity. Wuhan-Corona, like other coronaviruses, looks to fade out at a <30% threshold.
(2) 0.8% to 1.0% of society dies any year anyway.
The categories Corona-Positive Deaths (0.01%-0.08% of society) and Expected Deaths This Year (0.8%-1.0% of society) are also going to overlap by a substantial degree; share of nursing home deaths being a good proxy.
The final mortality impact may be closer to +0.01% than +0.1%.
Tucker Carlson opens his Nov. 16th 8pm EST show bashing lockdowns.
Why no Election Fraud coverage?
Tucker should have been slamming lockdowns back in March and April instead of cheerleading them. At this rate, he'll be hitting election fraud in June 2021.
8:20pm EST, after Tucker does several sub-segments bashing lockdowns, he says:
"Well. You probably heard about Dominion voting software used in the election some places. There are claims that it cased massive fraud, turned the course of the election. Update, after the break."
8:25pm EST, after long commercial break Tucker finally gets around to the pesky Election Fraud topic.
"We're not going to endorse that story until we see the evidence ourselves."
Then he goes on usual spiel about elites and media double-standards for ignoring the story. Ironic!
(1) The media is lying but "trying to hold the republic together" at this point; (2) Trump will prove voter fraud; (3) Trump will step down anyway; (4) This for the good of the country to prevent civil war
@ScottAdamsSays that Trump stepping down AFTER proving election fraud will be "like George Washington."
A reference to Washington supposedly declining to be crowned King of America when he could have, and/or declining a third presidential term when he easily could have had one.
Scott Adams ends his Nov. 14 broadcast fielding questions from critical viewers
Viewer comment: "Do you really think he'll 'do a George Washington'?"
Scott Adams: I don't know that I could predict he'll do that. I do predict that we'll know there was massive fraud....