The picture we have is that Wuhan-Corona as an indisputably severe flu wave, but just as indisputably as one within the normal-historical range for such flu waves. A Sweden born in 1957 has lived through 13 comparable severe flu waves.
(Excesses rounded to the hundredth place and calculated on +/- two year averages.) (From Swedish Health Ministry and Eurostat.)
Zoom-in on 2000-2020 for Sweden:
The magnitude of the Wuhan-Corona wave is clearly above the baseline but nothing close to the virus-apocalypse movie people were sold.
Recall this is Sweden, the Wuhan-Corona Natural Experiment. #SwedenWasRight to not Lockdown. Many were wrong.
Graphs are helpful because you can grasp instantly what it takes a lot of words to halfway convey.
"Data hugs the baseline." When it goes low, it tends to soon go up. When it goes high, it tends to soon 'correct' and go low again.
2019 was a remarkably mild year and 2020 corrected for it.
That simple and highly mundane observation alone accounts for a surprising portion of the Wuhan-Corona wave, perhaps at very least a quarter of it, maybe a third.
I made this Corona-Context graph (deaths as a % of population) into one graphic.
Either #SwedenWasRight to not engage in any shutdowns, or we should have done shutdowns about once every five years, appoximately forever.
They "used an 'all of the above' strategy to steal the 2020 presidential election...includ[ing] old-fashioned ballot stuffing, pay-per-vote, ballot harvesting, dead voters, double-voting, illegal voting, and intimidation of voting officials and volunteers."
-- Kenneth R Timmerman
He is a longtime investigative journalist (@KenTimmerman)
It seems the death rate of people with The Virus on an all-population basis for a first-world population is 0.03% to 0.25%, depending on which subdemographics it hits disproportionately and on baseline age and health of the community.
0.03%-0.25% deaths of people with the virus,
but
(1) There is no virus in history that 100% of people get. Expansion then end with #herdimminity. Wuhan-Corona, like other coronaviruses, looks to fade out at a <30% threshold.
(2) 0.8% to 1.0% of society dies any year anyway.
The categories Corona-Positive Deaths (0.01%-0.08% of society) and Expected Deaths This Year (0.8%-1.0% of society) are also going to overlap by a substantial degree; share of nursing home deaths being a good proxy.
The final mortality impact may be closer to +0.01% than +0.1%.
Tucker Carlson opens his Nov. 16th 8pm EST show bashing lockdowns.
Why no Election Fraud coverage?
Tucker should have been slamming lockdowns back in March and April instead of cheerleading them. At this rate, he'll be hitting election fraud in June 2021.
8:20pm EST, after Tucker does several sub-segments bashing lockdowns, he says:
"Well. You probably heard about Dominion voting software used in the election some places. There are claims that it cased massive fraud, turned the course of the election. Update, after the break."
8:25pm EST, after long commercial break Tucker finally gets around to the pesky Election Fraud topic.
"We're not going to endorse that story until we see the evidence ourselves."
Then he goes on usual spiel about elites and media double-standards for ignoring the story. Ironic!
(1) The media is lying but "trying to hold the republic together" at this point; (2) Trump will prove voter fraud; (3) Trump will step down anyway; (4) This for the good of the country to prevent civil war
@ScottAdamsSays that Trump stepping down AFTER proving election fraud will be "like George Washington."
A reference to Washington supposedly declining to be crowned King of America when he could have, and/or declining a third presidential term when he easily could have had one.
Scott Adams ends his Nov. 14 broadcast fielding questions from critical viewers
Viewer comment: "Do you really think he'll 'do a George Washington'?"
Scott Adams: I don't know that I could predict he'll do that. I do predict that we'll know there was massive fraud....