#BombayHighCourt will hear the intervention plea filed by victims of the #Malegaonblastcase today seeking to be heard in the plea filed by Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit prime accused in the case for quashing of the FIR.
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik will hear the plea.
Hearing begins.
Sr. Adv. BA Desai appearing for the intervener begins his submission.
Court (to Purohit’s lawyer): Has he been allowed to intervene in the trial court?
Adv. Neela Gokhale for Lt. Col. Purohit: Yes, he has been allowed to intervene in the trial.
Gokhale: But despite that, the matter pertains to the question as to whether the accused was carrying on the task in discharge of his duties or not.
For this purpose, the Ld. ASG for NIA can assist the court ably.
Gokhale: The intervener may be of assistance in the Trial court, but not in this petition.
Desai begins his submissions.
Court: We have perused your application and have also gone through the judgments. We will keep this matter for orders on Friday.
Court: You have filed a voluminous compilation of judgments, we have seen that. Do you want to submit anything beyond this?
Desai starts pointing out what the judgments are.
Court: We have gone through your volume. I think what you are arguing is present in that.
Desai: It is milord.
Desai: What I want to stress is that, in this experienced court, without me being heard, if the case is decided it is favoured against the prosecution, then I will have a feeling my whole life that no justice was done.
Desai: For the purpose of developing the jurisprudence of victimology, for justice and fair play, and for justice to be seen to be done, let the victims be added.
Gokhale: Whatever he has submitted, the judgments, are pertaining to his intervention in the trial.
The present plea is for a limited issue. I am not the accused no. 1, I am no. 9, so if NIA has discharged no. 1, so be it, but in this plea his intervention may not be allowed.
Desai: We are party in every proceeding, SC, Trial court, everywhere.
Court: Who is this Sameer (referring to person in the VC).
Gokhale: Milords he is a co-accused, he need not be heard, he will only delay the hearing.
Court (to NIA): What is the stage of the investigation?
Adv. Sandesh Patil for NIA: The investigation is ongoing. The next date is 26.11.
Court: Please submit your one page objection to the application (to Gokhale)
#BombayHighCourt has reserved their verdict on the intervention plea. Will pronounce the verdict on Friday.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Karnataka HC to hear a batch of pleas challenging the induction of three Members of the State Legislative Council (MLCs) - R Shankar, AH Vishwanath, and N Nagaraj - into the Council of Ministers.
Supreme Court hears the case relating to implementation of ICDS Schemes through Aganwadi Centers, particularly during Covid.
Plea contends that children went hungry during #COVID19 #SupremeCourt
Union states an affidavit was filed on Nov 20.
ASG Aishwarya Bhatia appears for the Union
Justice Bhushan: when are the anganwadis opening
Centre: Anganwadi workers have gone to homes of beneficiaries and provided meals
Bhati: Regarding reopening Ministry of women and child development to take a call after discussion with concerned states so that aanganwadi can be resumed outside containment centre. @MinistryWCD
Took it up with @HMOIndia
#BombayHighCourt to decide today if the victim of #Malegaonblastcase can intervene in plea filed by Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, an accused in the case, who is seeking to quash certain charges levied on him by NIA.
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik to give verdict @ 11am.
After the Supreme Court had granted interim bail to Arnab Goswami in 2018 abetment to suicide case, bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee to deliver detailed reasoning for its November 11 order shortly
Justice DY Chandrachud begins dictating the reasons: We have perused over Section 306bof IPC. It cannot be said appellants had abetted the suicide of the head of the architectural firm. HC said the justification to quash has to be excercised carefully
Justice DY Chandrachud : if the HC was carrying a prima facie evaluation then it could not have seen that there was no nexus between FIR and Section 306 IPC
After Justice L Nageswara Rao led bench of the Supreme Court, on Monday, extended the parole granted to AG Perarivalan, convict in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, by a week, Perarivalan has again approached SC for extension of parole
Senior Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan seeks a further extension for four weeks: there is a 25 percent blockage of kidney. Three months extension was a bit too much but a reasonable extension is needed.
SC: Why don't you ask the government?
AAG of Tamil Nadu: 30 days parole is allowed in 2 years. He is already allowed 51 days. Now he has a hospital 25 km away he wants to go to a hospital which is 200 km away. Those facts are not presented before the court.