🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙

Perhaps the most important number in the spending review today is £27 billion

It’s the best guess by the OBR at how much taxes may have to rise or spending fall to close the permanent deficit

And the government just doesn’t want to talk about it.

But we do/
£27 billion/

Here it is on page 5 of the OBR

“Even on the loosest conventional definition of balancing the books, a fiscal adjustment of £27 billion would be required to match day to day spending to receipts by the end of the 5 year forecast”
£27 billion/

Why does this matter? That is what it’ll take to close the current deficit according to the OBR.

In 2010, the figure George Osborne announced was £40 billion: this gives you a sense of Parliament defining scale of the challenge ahead.

But the gvt says...
£27 billion/

... nothing

The gvt will not acknowledge the £27 billion or say if it’s even remotely right.

They says the OBR is an “independent forecaster” and now is “not the time to put figures on it given uncertainty”

🤨

Why?
£27 billion/

They don’t want to engage presumably because
- They don’t want a £27 billion tax bombshell headline
- They’ve spent a huge amount of money today so it’s mixed messages
- Theres no answer yet to “when to raise taxes” debate ... so just don’t start it
£27 billion/

There was lots of bad news in the OBR forecast published alongside the spending review. £394 bn debt this year. Unemployment peaks at 2.4 million.

But they’ve put off the debate about the consequences - the pain - to another day. Very Boris. Not very George.
£27 billion/

As part of Rishi’s complete rejection of Osbornomics, apart from aid cuts and public sector pay freeze, today was a spending bonanza

⬆️£14.8bn more for Whitehall departments
£27 billion/

So we don’t know from the Treasury

1️⃣ The scale of the deficit to be filled in
2️⃣ The timescale it must be done over
3️⃣ The mix of tax and spend

Because of “uncertainty”

Even tho the OBR was confident enough to put 1️⃣ and 2️⃣ in their Executive Summary:
£27 billion/

The problem for Tories is that they don’t have long to solve these questions.

This - 2020 - is the moment in a Parliament - furthest from a general election - where you have the political space to raise taxes. Delay it and the pain comes closer to the 2024 poll 🥶
£27 billion/

The founder of the Northern Research Group Jake Berry says wait til 2024

news.sky.com/story/spending…

But do you then have to put £27 billion tax rises in the Tory manifesto🔥. Or, er, fudge it🔥🔥?
£27 billion/

So the dilemma will roll into next year

Rishi Sunak has dodged this question today. But it’s not going away.

And a credible answer to the “how big” question is on the OBR document he laid before Parliament today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Coates Sky

Sam Coates Sky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SamCoatesSky

25 Nov
OBR on Brexit
We continue to assume that the UK and EU conclude a free-trade agreement (FTA) and that there is a smooth transition to the new trading relationship after the transition period ends on 31 December 2020
OBR on Brexit /2

However, there is evidence that neither the Government nor
businesses are fully prepared for the imminent changes even if a deal is agreed.
OBR on Brexit /3

But some short-term disruption, especially to exports, remains a downside risk – the Bank’s latest forecast assumes that such disruption will reduce GDP by around 1 per cent in the first quarter of 2021.
Read 6 tweets
14 Nov
Tonight Government ARE actively confirming George Pascoe Watson acted as an unpaid advisor to the NHS Test & Trace team on comms.
Also Lord O’Shaughnessy did act as a paid advisor to the NHS Test & Trace team on innovations. And Lord Feldman did work as an unpaid advisor to the Ex lobbyist Lord Bethell, to provide additional capacity to the Department in its work with industry to tackle coronavirus.
George Pascoe Watson and Lord Feldman were not involved in any procurement decisions which were made by officials, the government says on background
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
Westminster somersaulted overnight at the scoop by @elliottimes that Lee Cain, currently Director of Communications is “poised” to be made Boris Johnson’s chief of staff. Congratulations to Times political editor on throwing a pebble which has caused **quite** so many waves.
This thread is not about household names. But the issues matter - because it touches on two key things in government, its direction, and who exercises grip on the prime minister. How powerful is the Vote Leave faction? And the rest?
What’s going on? Lee Cain is a long standing senior aide to the prime minister. He worked with BJ on the 2016 Vote Leave campaign. Alongside him in the Foreign Office and - importantly - during the wilderness years after he resigned from Theresa May’s government. Boris trusts him
Read 16 tweets
8 Nov
Interestingly emphatic message from a govt source that arrival of President Elect Biden does *not* make a difference to their approach to Brexit. We're in the final countdown on brexit - 5 to 10 days left - and big gaps remain.
1/
2/ This despite it being likely that Biden's arrival does change the context: next US administration will give more credence to Irish viewpoint on Good Friday Agreement. No reason to think Biden will alter September view that no EU-UK trade deal means no UK-US trade deal
3/ Are we tiptoeing closer to no trade deal? The UK government is thinking about argument to make over why the EU Commission hasn't treated us fairly. Gvt dug in on the Internal Market bill. Dominic Raab suggested the EU putting peace in NI at risk this morning.
Read 14 tweets
6 Nov
NEW

YouGov voting intention puts Labour 5 points ahead of the Tories

L 40 (+2)
C 35 (-3)
LD 7 (+1)
BXP (+2)

** It'll cause a shiver down Tory spines but individual C and L changes IS within +/-3 margin of error (just)

BUT some notable changes:

BUT.... Image
If you do a comparison with Oct 21/22

** Leave voters two weeks ago was C 60, L 13. In the current poll Leave voters C 56, L 20

** Two weeks ago 85% of GE2019 Tory voters would vote Tory again, now 78%. The L % unchanged at 87%
** BXP is bouncing around and so their two relaunches have had no measurable impact - over the last 4 weeks their poll number has been 5%, 3%, 4%, 6% so too early to say they're keyh. The amount they're eating into GE2019 Tory vote in latest poll (7%) similar to Oct 21/22 (5%)
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
NOW: EHRC report into Labour and antisemitism
- Culture which “at worst” “could be seen to accept” antisemitism
- Serious failings in leadership
- There WERE unlawful acts of harassment and discriminations
- some complaints not investigated
- evidence of “political interference” in handling AS complaints sometimes based on press interest not consistent criteria
- How the Labour Party broke the law twice:
By allowing “agents” to break equality law anti Semitic tropes and suggesting complaints were fake or smears. As these people are acting as agents, Labour is responsible
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!