The Auditor General's rebuke of Ontario's COVID response and widespread criticism (under the hashtag #mockdownAB) of yesterday's "new restrictions" announced by Alberta's Premier are examples of eroding public trust in governments' ability to protect citizens.
That's bad news.
Citizens are being asked to forego weddings / graduations / visits with sick relatives, shutter businesses, and otherwise upend their lives. They'll be asked to get vaccinated in the (hopefully) near future.
All of these requests require trust, and trust requires transparency.
Little is transparent when CMOHs are subordinate to politicians during public health emergencies, and organizing like that constrains nimble, effective responses to emerging public health threats. It's not the first time we've seen this play out recently.
For 17 years now, Canada and its provinces and territories have ignored the recommendation of multiple commissions after we botched the SARS response. "In public health emergencies, the operational powers of the Minister of Health should be removed and assigned to the CMOH."
It's true, as professors @Lorian_H and @profamirattaran write here, that CMOHs have clear legal authority to act independently, but the organizational flaws that remain since 2003 limit their willingness to use their powers (much as we wish they would). macleans.ca/opinion/politi…
Public health - not politicians - should be in charge. Not just because public health knows how to prevent infection spread. But because of their ability to weigh multiple impacts (including economic ones) on population wellbeing. From today's Hill Times piece:
It is as unfair as it is unwise to saddle politicians with the responsibility of making decisions in a public health emergency. Political interests and timelines can find their way into their decision calculations, and our elected leaders have not been "showing their work".
So if politicians' perspectives / priorities and CMOHs' positions prevent wise public health measures, we need some other way to restore public trust and limit this public health catastrophe.
We think establishing a pandemic response observatory can help.
Besides taking the heat off of politicians and advancing an evidence-based approach to overall population well-being, an independent observatory would save citizens and media from being confused between real experts and good tweeters, popular advice and considered advice.
And it would let our health professionals and people providing essential services focus on their work instead of spending their precious little rest time advocating for effective public health measures.
We have a habit of evaluating jurisdictional performance *after* being confronted by public health crisis. Report cards *during* this emergency might get us a better result.
Let's be clear, though. Until every Canadian jurisdiction finally makes good on the recommendations of post-SARS commissions almost 2 decades ago so that public health can act truly independently in emergencies, these failures will happen again and again. (end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The collision of COVID+OD epidemics makes drug law reform more urgent, yes, but criminalizing people who use certain drugs is no more or less unjust now compared to before. It has always been racist, classist and wrong.
It's excellent news that @CACP_ACCP finally endorses decriminalization of simple drug possession. But since the "treat addiction as a health issue" chorus is getting really loud and obscuring the underlying problems (and intents) of today's drug laws, here's a thread/re-thread /1
As a Canadian, Albertan, hockey-loving, public health specialist doctor, I feel like I should write this down somewhere:
I think this playoff hockey plan in Edmonton and Toronto is a bad idea.
Even if every player, team staff, official, arena/ice crew, security person, food/bev worker, hotel staff, delivery driver, bus driver, etc etc can follow every aspect of the plan (excursions, room restrictions, testing and all), there are major messaging and equity issues.
People are fatiguing of public health messaging asking them to "continue to be cautious because COVID19 is still here."
In early May 92% of Canadians reported practicing physical distancing. In late June it had decreased to 77%. www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti…
We spend Christmastime with the people we love most.
Like we do on birthdays.
My birthday happens to be Christmas Day.
And this one - the first without my dad - is the worst one of my life.
I feel like people on Vancouver's Downtown Eastside would understand.
(Story/Thread)
At Thanksgiving, the man I was most thankful for died at 77. My dad was active, energetic, hilarious. He was the one who always caught his children and grandchildren when we fell.
We never thought *he* could fall.
As it goes with South Asian kinfolk, dozens of devastated friends and family arrived at our home within hours of his passing to comfort and feed us, wishing us strength and courage “to get through this most difficult time.”
By now, everyone agrees (or should) that harm from opioids is a most pressing public health issue. But between smart people there’s disagreement on what role prescribing plays. Some thoughts on that (THREAD): /1
Yesterday, @CPSA_CA Registrar Dr. McLeod’s op-ed described changes in opioid prescribing in Alberta.
# of individuals prescribed opioids – ⬇️ 9000
Total morphine equivalents dispensed to population – ⬇️14% /2 edmontonjournal.com/opinion/column…
These indicators have tracked well with deaths. More prescription opioids in a population, more exposure, more harms. We were right to be concerned in Canada and the U.S. /3