▪️406 (10%) records identified as possible deceased, sent a ballot
▪️356 records possible deceased, ballot not returned
▪️43 records, possible deceased voters➡️BALLOT RETURNED
1/6
43 records, possible deceased voters with ballots returned⤵️
▪️21 CONFIRMED LIKELY DECEASED (15 in Maricopa County)
▪️12 possible deceased, more research needed (11 in MC)
▪️10 deceased after casting a ballot 🗳 This category is completely valid votes!
2/6
OUR PROCESS
▪️Over 129 people assisted in a PRELIMINARY audit to identify if ballots for deceased voters were cast
▪️Identified deceased voters who received a ballot were audited TWICE
▪️Identified deceased voters who returned a ballot were audited THREE TIMES
3/6
OUR PROCESS (CONTINUED)
▪️Voters were researched against highly regarded databases of public information
▪️When available, additional cross checks for obituary listings
▪️Unable to verify if signatures accepted due to Maricopa site not accepting most voter ID numbers
4/6
▪️We checked to see if there were a high number of deceased voters identified in precincts where Biden/Kelly received 70%+ of the vote⤵️
▪️43 potentially deceased voters received ballots
▪️Only two show as being cast, both in Maricopa County
5/6
DECEASED VOTERS IN ARIZONA
With 10% of voter records identified as alleged deceased & receiving a ballot, we must have an investigation into voter lists
With 11% of alleged deceased voters returning a ballot, the election results must be investigated
Special thanks to @LizHarrisMBA for starting this project in AZ and to all 129 volunteers that assisted, especially our team of 6 auditors that double and triple checked our work!
We had volunteers dedicated to this day & night for many days to complete this work
For those asking on how we specifically identified a possibly deceased voter ⤵️
▪️We matched by first, middle, last name & middle initial
▪️We looked for month & year of birth match
▪️We looked at deceased persons nationwide for newly registered voters
▪️We searched by address
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My review of DOMINION Maricopa County AZ RFP is complete
HIGHLIGHTS⤵
✅System does not need to be connected to internet
✅Interface designed for simplified hand counts, recounts, & audits
✅Features accommodate full transparency
⚠Security concerns exist
Details⤵
PLZ NOTE
My review at this point consists of publicly published information, which only includes:
1️⃣ Maricopa County AZ Solicitation maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter…
My observations & research pt by pt in your letter:
1. We have no evidence of an accurate or reliable election since @maricopacounty has yet to publish any formal technical or security analysis docs re Dominion 1/
.@maricopacounty Board of Supervisors vote for $6.1M allocation of funds to Dominion Jun 26 '19 had no consideration of a technical review and no discussion
From May 20 '19 MC Election Workgroup request, RFP was completed & negotiated very quickly in about a month #SecureTheVote
Several other Secretary of State Depts do have technical review formal test docs of Dominion published
➡️PA 107pg report Jan '19
➡️CO 30pg Aug '19
➡️GA 27pg Aug '19
➡️TX reports Feb, Jun, Nov '19
*TX denied cert for security USB issues, ballot secrecy, accurate operation