The present anti-China hysteria is profoundly racist. The Economist deems it's OK for everyone else to eat meat except the Chinese

I'm amazed at the number of anti-China journalists who are of Chinese origin, many of whom are beautiful Chinese women who have received elite
2/Western education. These are the most virulent toxic voices against China who blithely publish one big lie after another on China in western MSM. It's almost as if they are competing with each other to see who can best turn the world against China. I guess this is the type of
3/ Chinese people who haven't suffered from racism directed against Asians and as a result they are convinced that this Western anti-China hysteria is solely motivated by ideological human rights concern instead of down right sinophobia racism. Unfortunately
4/the nature of the anti-China campaign is profoundly racist. The anti-China racism also encompasses people like them, the useful elite idiots.

For the first time in history, a non-white race is on the point of surpassing the West. Unlike the West, China, even at the height of
5/its world dominance, didn't go on killing sprees to conquer other people. Its policy towards the vsssal states was to "embrace tenderness" (怀柔)。

For fear of being dominated by Chinese & reduced to the miserable fate of being mass slaughtered & rendered homeless by the new
6/Chinese masters just as the West has done to Muslims & others, West has gone completely frenetic in order to prevent such an unthinkable scenario.

Even though China has repeatedly reassured West that this would not happen. But what can you do? Criminals will always project
7/ criminality onto others. That's why West invented the hoax of #UighurGenocide to convince people that China is the threat instead of the USA.

Even Chinese people eating more meat nowadays is being used against China. Read what the Economist writes on Chinese people's meat
8/ consumption yourself and see the joke!

One reads:

"The planet needs China to curb its appetite for meat"

"Empire of the Pig - China's insatiable appetite for pork is a symbol of the country's rise. It's also a danger to the world."

However though Chinese people eating
9/ meat is a danger to the world, Africans eating meat is a desirable thing. The Economist writes:

"Global meat eating is on the rise bringing surprising benefits. As Africans get richer, they will eat more meat and live longer healthier lives"

Westerners eat a lot more meat,
10/ about twice as much as average Chinese, but apparently they don't need to curb their meat consumption, only Chinese must eat less. Westerners eat plenty beef & lamb, farming of which is a lot more polluting than pig-raising. This doesn't seem to draw alarm from journalists.
11/ Africans are not subject to meat bashing either. It's advisable that they eat more meat because it's good for their health.

In short, everyone should eat meat except the Chinese. In reality, if there's anyone who should eat less because of the environment, Americans and
12/Europeans should do so first. Besides they are growing too fat. That's a health hazard.

Well, according to the principle that whatever West doesn't want China to do is good for China, after reading such article, I immediately went on a 80% carnivore diet (mainly beef) to the
13/ great benefit of my health. My health and energy level have since shot through the roof. I feel like a thoroughbred now! Thank you The Economist for giving me such sound advice.

This anti-China hysteria is so crude and gross and overtly racist, it's become a joke.
14/ One wouldn't expect such articles from serious journalists, but one only sees such trash in Western MSM everyday. The journalists of the Economists are nothing but racist pigs obsessed with pigs.
15/ I see tweets trending on China meat-bashing hoax by the Economist. I'm glad. But just know I'm the originator of the Economist screenshots and the idea of the racist meat-bashing. 😂😂Otherwise I'm perfectly fine with the meat meme trending and the Economist publicly shamed.
Chinese people eating meat. It's delicious and nutritious.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PandemicTruther

25 Nov
I've thought of a way for China to make the West shut up about the Uighur or other cultural genocide. China should apply for intangible human cultural heritage for the Uighur dance which it goes to great lengths to conserve and promote; and also apply for
2/ tangible heritage for China's superbly renovated ancient mosques.

Just the press coverage of such a move on China's part would destroy to some extent the myth of China's alleged cultural genocide. The PR value will be huge. What's Unesco going do? If it refuses
3/ to grant the coveted cultural heritage status, then Unesco is at fault for cultural genocide, not China.

If in the improbable scenario that Unesco grants the status, then it's very good for China both for the prestige per se and for the rehabilitation of the reputation.
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov
Why I think China will have a decisive advantage over the West in AI.

AI is based on the analysis of big data and analysis is philosophy, the understanding of how elements and situations interact with each other. China designed algorithms are shown to be extraordinarily
2/ functional.

Jack Ma's AI is very powerful. His online company lends to the poorest 500 million people in China at the usury rate of 15-20% and nobody defaults. He beats largely the Wall Street sharks thanks to his big data analysis. (Sarcasm intended here 😥). TikTok is
3/ famed for its algorithm targeting consumers with unswerving precision. Twitter is a lot dumber than TikTok. It still thinks I'm a young boy of modest means and its ads always try to get me to buy bermuda shorts at 3 US$ a piece. It thrusts video games at me everyday.
Read 11 tweets
23 Nov
An understanding of China's diplomatic assertiveness or "Wolf Warrior" diplomacy. 😃

China has a virtue. It minds its own business and doesn't meddle in other countries' internal affairs. This allows it to have lightning focus on the problems it wants to solve.
2/ China doesn't invent propaganda lies about other countries to fool its own people or to use as an excuse for aggression. In China's official media, all countries and regions are depicted in a positive light. All countries and people are beautiful and friendly. Africa is
3/ presented as a pleasant place of great opportunities. So China's official media is made out to be the Orwellian Propaganda with smiling faces. Or you can say it's a conscious effort on the part of a well meaning government to promote a harmonious society.
Read 15 tweets
22 Nov
An understanding of US hegemony and China

US hegemony is mainly made of the following pillars:
1/ High-tech
2/ US military
3/ US dollar supremacy
4/ Worldwide media Propaganda
5/ US sanctions

US military, equipped with the most advanced high-tech weapon is the most
2/ powerful in the world. US military can destroy any country it wants aided by its propaganda. Given US is able to use war and sanctions to reduce the currency of any country to toilet paper, relatively US$ has become the strongest currency. US can coup any country it wants,
3/ but nobody can coup the US.

All these pillars serve and reinforce each other. China's rising is a game changer. China's advance in high-tech is likely to give its military a disruptive advantage over the US. A regular weapon combined with 5G and AI is altogether of
Read 11 tweets
20 Nov
An understanding of the Taiwan Mainland China relationship

If US intervenes militarily to accelerate the Taiwan unification process, US is not to be blamed but to be thanked. International diplomatic wordplay oblige, blame is put forward instead of thanks. 😄
2/ US is welcome if it wants to strategically force Taiwan into the arms of Motherland.

Forcefully unifying Taiwan is a piece of cake. China doesn't even have to deploy military forces. Moment when China expresses such intention, Taiwan will surrender for the reason that its
3/ economy will collapse when cut off from the Mainland. In a sense, Taiwan is already de facto unified to China. Taiwan's interdependence and dependence on Mainland China is comparable to California to the rest of America. Its exports to the Mainland represent a sizable chunk
Read 14 tweets
8 Nov
China! China has a problem. All Western democracies have failed to contain Covid19. Why should China have succeeded?

Macron and Trump were convinced that it's impossible for China to have succeeded. More people must have died. China must have been hiding something.
2/ Trump shouldn't have compared himself to President Xi. China makes him look bad. His PR damage control should have oriented Americans' attention to Europe. He should have compared himself to France, Spain Italy.... Scalewise, the Covid19 statistics are comparable.
3/ Besides the US cases are either local or imported from Europe. China is irrelevant to US Covid19.

To plead for Trump, the disastrous Covid19 response in the US is not just a Trump thing. If another president were in his place, the debacle would have been the same.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!