I’m fascinated by the question raised in this great blog post (read first).

“Always address the abnormal vital signs first”

I’m gonna think through some physiologic uncertainties and hope that @smithECGBlog @JSawallaGusehMD @MKIttlesonMD @BCMHeart can help me.

Thread 1/
I’ve always thought of severe hypertension as a cause of increased myocardial oxygen demand. Which makes sense for the SBP (afterload, wall stress)... it’s what the LV is contracting against.

2/
But what role does the DBP play?

Not much of one as far as the LV’s workload far as I can think...

But diastole is when coronary perfusion happens. Applying Ohm’s law in that vascular bed,

DBP - LVEDP = coronary blood flow (CBF) x coronary vascular resistance (CVR).

3/
Is CVR any higher than baseline in setting of systemic hypertension?

On the one hand, maybe, because of a common confounder of elevated systemic catecholamine levels. But esp if the heart is working harder, there must be some local vasodilatory mediators at play too...

4/
So if we assume CVR is not elevated, then any increase in DBP should proportionally increase CBF.

If DBP is 130 instead of 65 with the same coronary resistance, then coronary flow doubles.

Which should offset a lot of the increase demand from SBP?

5/
The other term to question is LVEDP. Does high DBP translate to high LVEDP and this keep the gradient flat? Somewhat... but I think not linearly. Especially if there’s not much dyspnea / pulmonary edema, the LVEDP probably isn’t elevated by as the DBP is. If AV intact.

6/
OR... is myocardial ischemia, dysfunction, injury in severe HTN more mediated by hypertensive MICROangiopathy, in which case all the formulas and assumptions above get thrown out the window.

Teach me, #medtwitter #cardiotwitter

7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zavén Sargsyan

Zavén Sargsyan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sargsyanz

11 Nov
Folks always confuse 1:1,000 vs. 1:10,000 epinephrine, when you're supposed to use which, what the dosing is, etc

Here's what helps me remember/teach.

Thread 1/9 Image
There's two main indications for epi - code blue and anaphylaxis.

1. Code blue is a 1mg IV dose of 1:10,000 epi

2. Anaphylaxis is 0.3mg IM dose of 1:1,000 epi

Shouldn't be that hard to remember... but it is.

2/
There's the route, the dose, and the concentration.

The route is easiest. Think of epi being pushed IV during a code. Think of the epipen people jab into their thigh muscle for anaphylaxis.

1. Code – IV

2. Anaphylaxis - IM

Great, moving on.

3/
Read 9 tweets
1 Oct
Descriptive terms are great.

Take “calcific uremic arteriopathy.”

Arteriopathy. There’s a problem with arteries, so you might guess manifestations may be ischemic/necrotic.

1/6
Calcific...

Calcium deposits in the arteriolar walls, usually of the skin, causing fibrosis, thrombosis, obstruction.

Uremic...

This usually happens in the setting of kidney disease and a high calcium-phosphate product, though it’s complicated.

PMID 29719190

2/
Ischemic skin hurts, and necrotic tissues get infected. It’s a very bad disease.

The original (and still most commonly used) name, calciphylaxis, doesn’t tell as much of a story. Where did it come from?

3/
Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
+1 for organization/structure as foundation of effective communication.

Learners often struggle with shifting expectations. And teachers sometimes associated highly structured presentations with wordy ones. So I want to emphasize:

Organized does not mean wordy.

1/6
Example: here is a organized and efficient yet thorough presentation. < 1 minute. < 3 tweets.

“Ms J is our lady with HF and DM here with pyelo.

This morning back pain is better, dysuria’s gone. Didn’t sleep well from noise.

Tmax 99.7, BP around 150s, other VS normal...”
“...Looks more comfy, oriented. JV 10cm, lungs clear. CVA less tender.

White count 10 from 16. Chem 7 totally normal. Sugars were 180, 203, 144, 130. Urine with E.coli, sensies pending.

Right now she’s on ceftriaxone, lisinopril, metop, Lantus + prandial, senna, prn APAP...”
Read 6 tweets
10 Sep
I agree; there’s a theme there to be explored.

We have a tendency to overcorrect, to gravitate to extremes.

And to get overemotional or snarky when advocating for what we think are best clinical practices.

I’m guilty too. But I think there are downsides.

1/8
First, our own practice & quality of care suffer when we think in extremes and absolutes.

Second, we can communicate oversimplified or wrong messages to learners who don’t have the same contextual knowledge.

Some examples of such misunderstandings...

2/
#NeverFOBT 😡, people say.

What about CRC screening?

What about this stool, which might be blood or food pigment? Or the self-evacuated black stool of a patient who’s on iron or pepto, and is tachy today?

I’d Guaiac that, and change management if overtly + vs -.

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
3 Sep
Had a realization about quiet heart sounds that came about a decade late.

Short thread.

1/4
Ok.

S1 and S2 happen when pressure gradients snap them shut. Right-sided cardiac pressures and thus valve-closing pressure gradients are lower, this P2 is quieter than A2.

And if you get pulmonary hypertension, P2 gets louder.

A bit more from UpToDate:

2/4 Image
What about hypOtension? If you’re septic or bleeding or in cardiogenic shock, the lower pressure gradients should translate to quieter sounds.

Thus, quiet heart sounds in this setting are probably less discerning for pericardial fluid.

3/4
Read 4 tweets
25 Jul
I haven’t ordered a CK-MB in 8 years.

If you’re worried about the ❤️, it adds nothing to your troponin.

If you’re worried about 🥩💪🏽, it adds nothing to CK.

Many hospital/labs don’t even run CK-MBs, considering them too low-value.

#TipsForNewDocs
Thanks for comments, y’all. Regarding utility in detecting reinfarction:

First, I must say that I do hospital medicine and minimal ICU, so this isn’t a daily quandary for me. I was mostly imagining the “new docs” on the wards.

That being said, some thoughts/references:

1/7
First, the whole idea is that MB may have an earlier rise than troponin, and a quicker fall (especially if low GFR).

As such, in back to back events, there may be a clearer separation of humps in the MB curve.

You may have seen curves like this (Wikipedia)

2/ Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!