Ahead of #BonifacioDay a thread of readings and some other things like maps and music. First, Monumento: why is it, where it is, why does it have that design, what does it represent in our national imagination? officialgazette.gov.ph/bonifacio-150/
6. But together with Bonifacio's glory is the tragedy of his fall. For that reason, he occupies an uneasy place in our national story. quezon.ph/2017/08/31/spo…#BonifacioDay
7. It's well to reflect on the state of flux our society was in, in his time, reflected right on down to what we chose to consider parts of our country back then. quezon.ph/2017/06/12/spo…#BonifacioDay
12. Or consider the value of a simple, remembered list: of Katipuneros present at the start of our revolution, and what their occupations tells us about the movement.
13. Or consider how we see Bonifacio in postcards and paintings, and how this might clash with his sole surviving photo. An essay on his portrayal down the years.
16. Then (as this photo taken 80 years ago tomorrow shows) as now, we come together as a nation for solemn days like #BonifacioDay. How we do so, though, can change. How is it different now from before?
17. We are part of an ongoing national conversation on #BonifacioDay since experts, we should remember, will always disagree and can't resolve everything.
18. If you have some spare cash do buy Jim Richardson's fascinating book, "The Light of Liberty," but if you don't, you can read all his research online, free, here: kasaysayan-kkk.info No #BonifacioDay is complete without visiting his fantastic site.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Note on that Princess Margaret/Imelda scene in The Crown: background is princess collected seashells; when Madame whisked her away to see “shells” it showed her having done her research on guest plus her heavy-handed Imeldific hospitality. For real-life accounts see these books.
An excerpt from Lady Glenconner's book:
You're best off with Caroline Kennedy's savage write ups on IRM and friends. 1. One Little Girl, a meditation of sorts, on Madame. anywhereiwander.com/2012/05/24/one…
This reminds me of what an archaeologist told me about how to understand prehispanic polities or chiefdoms. We have to understand it not in a strictly territorial sense but from the perspective of toll. Yes, toll. The chiefs held sway over groups of people and claimed exclusive..
authority to exact toll from commerce/trade/travel through their area of authority, perhaps their portion of a river or a land area with high traffic. In dealing with Westerners different attitudes collided: chiefs “ceding” land actually ceded tolls and influence, but not...
clearly demarcated titles to land in the Western sense, which is why chiefs could do it not only seemingly so easily, but repeatedly. This was beyond the comprehension of Westerners (to be precise: not in their interest to recognize this of course).
Why the story of The Two Speakers has October 5, the public release of the SWS Survey results, as the dividing line between Cayetano Triumphant and Velasco Ascendant. A thread. Before and up to October 5, Cayetano had torn up term-sharing, and left the Pres. w/ a done deal.
The cliques of the Ruling Coalition had gone to the Palace on September 29. By all accounts, the President signaled the agreement should be upheld.
Using a tried-and-tested parliamentary maneuver, what Cayetano did was call for a vote of confidence by offering to resign --a vote of confidence he won on September 30.
A thread for the law literalists. True as it goes except in legislatures the world over, tradition and past precedents are very powerful; but like all tradition, only as powerful as the shared belief of legislators in the power of those traditions.
This is why I've come to believe that term limits are more useful in executive positions but actually harmful to sober and effective legislation when applied to the legislature: good parliamentary procedure and mature lawmaking requires time and seasoning that term limits end...
up subverting. So you have what we have increasingly had, ever-more-reckless leadership fights, among other things. Even more than executive positions where leadership changes signal changing priorities due to new mandates, legislation requires institutional memory and a sense...
So today it seems battle's joined with two separate sessions claiming to be the authentic House special session. Here's some context: look at ratios of deputy speakers, and blocs each group possesses, to assess their relative strengths. NPC's pro-Velasco; Lakas suddenly neutral?
Cayetano's coalition was NP (40 votes), NUP (43 votes), Lakas (19 votes), Iglesia; Velasco's, PDP-Laban (61 v.) and HNP (aka Hugpong 3 v.), with NPC (32 v.) announcing it would back him in this current battle, and Lakas saying it would attend to budget first before speakership.
In public statements Lakas (via Martin Romualdez) was most subtle: saying they would focus on passing the budget thus being publicly loyal to the letter; while not pledging to support any other candidate which suggests maintaining status quo (Cayetano).
Why you have to be aware that picking September 21 as the martial law anniversary is a tribute to Marcos who engineered it so people alive then actually forgot there was no martial law on September 21, 1972: a thread.
Marcos himself zigged and zagged about when he proclaimed martial law, but he turned September 21 into Thanksgiving Day enshrining a date that mattered only because of backdating. officialgazette.gov.ph/featured/decla…
Marcos began planning martial law when he became only the second president elected to a second term, in 1969, seeing he would have to step down from office in 1973. He also pursued other schemes ranging from shifting to parliamentary government or running Imelda to succeed him.