REACT1 round 7 interim update (13-24 Nov 2020):

We estimate that R has dropped < 1 (0.88 (0.86, 0.91)) during the second national lockdown.

Full preprint (not yet peer reviewed): imperial.ac.uk/medicine/resea…

More great work from @DrCWalters @eales96 @HaoweiWang7 @SRileyIDD

1/n
Results
- We found 821 positives from 105,123 swabs
- Unweighted prevalence of 0.78% (95% CI, 0.73%, 0.84%)
- Weighted prevalence of 0.96% (0.87%, 1.05%)
- The weighted prevalence estimate was ~30% lower than that of 1.32% (1.20%, 1.45%) obtained in the second half of round 6
The decrease in prevalence corresponds to a halving time of 37 (30, 47) days and an R = 0.88 (0.86, 0.91).

Using only data from the most recent period, we estimate an R = 0.71 (0.54, 0.90).

A spline fit to prevalence showed a fall coinciding w/ start of lockdown.
- The national trends driven mainly by reductions in higher-prevalence northern regions
- Prevalence approx unchanged in Midlands and London
- Smaller reductions in southern lower-prevalence regions
- Sub-regional analyses showed marked declines in the North & growth in Midlands
Mutually adjusted models in round 7 (interim) indicated:
-people of Asian ethnicity
-those living in the most deprived neighbourhoods
-those living in the largest households
- healthcare and care home workers
had higher odds of swab-positivity
Conclusions:

3 weeks into 2nd national lockdown in England there has been a ~30% reduction in prevalence overall w/ greater reductions in the North

As a result, inter-regional heterogeneity has reduced, although average absolute prevalence remains high at ~1%
...
The national prevalence estimate of 0.96% translates to ~720,000 infections in England on any one day

Estimated incidence in England is ~72,000 (58,000 to 78,000) infections per day

This estimate is down from ~100,000 (90,000 to 104,000) new infections per day at end of Oct
Continued monitoring of the epidemic in the community remains essential until prevalence is reliably suppressed to much lower levels, for example, through widespread vaccination.
The REACT-1 round 7 interim report is live on @medrxivpreprint: medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kylie Ainslie

Kylie Ainslie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrKAinslie

3 Oct
REACT-1 study update: Prevalence of swab positivity had increased to over 1 in 200 in England as of 26 Sep 2020. Weighted prev = 0.55% (0.47%, 0.64%). This implies 411,000 (351,000, 478,000) people are virus-positive.

Full results on medrxiv: medrxiv.org/content/10.110… (1/n)
Main results:
- 363 positives from 84,610 samples
- Weighted prev = 0.55% (0.47%, 0.64%)
- This continues upwards trend in prevalence seen since mid-Aug
- Highest observed prev since beginning of study in May 2020 & more than a four-fold increase in weighted prev observed in r4
- We estimate doubling time of 10.6 (9.4, 12.0) days from 20 Aug to 26 Sep
- This corresponds to a R of 1.47 (1.40, 1.53)
- Using data only from round 5 (18 Sep to 26 Sep) we estimate a R of 1.06 (0.74, 1.46) with probability of 63% that R is greater than 1.
Read 10 tweets
11 Sep
Our latest results from the REACT-1 study show that prevalence of #COVID19 is increasing in England. Main results are highlighted below.
The full (not yet peer reviewed) pre-print is available here: tinyurl.com/y3jw765x (1/n)

@SRileyIDD @DrCWalters @eales96 @HaoweiWang7
The epidemic declined between rounds 1 and 2, and 2 and 3, but was increasing between rounds 3 and 4: doubling time 17 (13, 23) days and R=1.3 (1.2, 1.4)

From the most recent round 4 data (22nd August and 7th September): doubling time 7.7 (5.5, 12.7) days and R=1.7 (1.4, 2.0)
Over all four rounds of the study, we found that 72% (67%, 76%) of swab-positive individuals were asymptomatic at the time of swab and in the week prior.

Our data were suggestive of a higher rate of asymptomatic swab-positivity in children compared to adults.
Read 9 tweets
6 Aug
Prevalence of #COVID19 in England is trending downward. Our new preprint on REACT 1 study found continued decline in prevalence and a shift in pattern of infection by age and occupation at end of initial lockdown in England. (1/n)
@SRileyIDD @DrCWalters
tinyurl.com/y6xzjppj
- Over both rounds combined, we estimate an
- average halving time of 38 (28, 58) days
- reproduction number (R) of 0.89.

- The proportion of asymptomatic swab-positive participants at the time of sampling increased from 69% (round 1) to 81% (round 2).
- Health care/care home workers were infected more frequently than other workers in round 1, but not in round 2
- Prevalence in 18-24 year olds reduced markedly between rounds
- Our data suggested increased risk of infection in Black and Asian (mainly South Asian) ethnicities
Read 7 tweets
20 Jul
Our new preprint shows there was a rapid and synchronised reduction in UK mobility just before and after the announcement of lockdown on 23 March. It's now live on @WellcomeOpenRes
wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-170…
@SRileyIDD @DrCWalters (1/6) Image
We used data from @Facebook and a UK mobile phone provider and found synchronised mobility patterns all across the UK (regardless of data source or geographic region). The largest reduction in mobility occurred around the time of the announcement of lockdown. (2/6) Image
Although mobility remained low since 26 March, we detected a gradual increase in mobility throughout the lockdown period. (3/6) Image
Read 6 tweets
28 Apr
When can the lockdown end? The results in our new preprint in @WellcomeOpenRes illustrate how the eventual decorrelation between transmission and movement is likely a key feature of successful #COVID19 exit strategies. wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-81/…
@SRileyIDD @DrCWalters @MRC_Outbreak
Using daily reported cases from mainland China and Hong Kong SAR, we estimated transmissibility over time and compared it to daily within-city movement, as a proxy for economic activity. Image
Initially, movement and transmission were very strongly correlated. However, that correlation decreased rapidly after the initial fall in transmissibility. In general, at the end of the study period the correlation was no longer apparent despite substantial increases in movement. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!