1/ Today the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued an advisory opinion about earned wage access products. If you’ve wondered what the legal skinny is on Dave, Earnin, Even and all the others -- this thread is for you.

files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cf…
2/ But first a word about Privacy.com. The safest and easiest way to shop online. Holiday deals are here :) So are hackers :(

Keep your bank card safe. Use Privacy cards instead. Free to use, easy to sign up.

And neobank builders will love our APIs and docs.
3/ Back to earned wage access.

Lots of FinTech cos will give you early access to your wages. Some front ACH while the credit clears. Others give you money by the day, up to several times a month.
4/ What are these legally? Likely one of:

→ consumer credit
→ a “cash advance”
→ early extinguishment of an obligation
→ early release of ACH funds
5/ Most of these products are going to be viewed by at least one regulator as credit. Since scale means offering them in most of the 50 states, this is the key needle for these products to thread.
6/ Lots of folks, including some bad lawyers, will tell you that offering a product without a fee means you aren’t offering credit.

This is false. In some states and in parts of federal law, even a product without a fee will be credit if it requires repayment at a later date.
7/ The fee is helpful for a different reason - whether you need a lending license. In some states, you can offer loans without a license if it falls under an interest rate threshold.

So a $0 fee product is still a loan, just not one you need a license or charter to offer.
8/ There are other states where $0 fee loans are still considered credit, so you need a license to offer the product. Those states often have statutory language that says the regulators should apply the statutory text liberally. This means to catch and punish unlicensed lenders.
9/ One of the other hallmarks of a loan/credit is whether there is recourse against the person receiving the funds. If you give out free money, without an obligation for the person to repay, you can sometimes fit into the “not a loan” space.
10/ But no one gives money away without strings attached. So companies tend to dress up their “not loans” as something else like an assignment of wages, or some other receivable that can be papered over.
11/ Interestingly, none of Dave, Earnin or Even seem to be going that far in their models. Instead, their terms read as a plain, no cost “not loan.”
12/ I call out “extinguishment of an obligation” because this is what I think a true earned wage access product is. The employer is obligated to pay the employee. The employer, perhaps with a provider like Even, is advancing funds to the employee.
13/ The last type of early wage access is early release of ACH funds. Chime and some other neo banks do this. In full disclosure, so will BofA depending on your service tier.
14/ Why don’t all banks give you access to your payroll ACH funds on the day they’re sent from your company? The answer is a mix of history (read inertia), old regs and fraud/payment risks.
15/ Back in the day, banks could sit on all or most of your paycheck until the funds fully cleared. This was helpful when banks had to mail stacks of paper checks to each other to clear.
16/ Fraudsters would engage in check kiting, or presenting paper checks at bank branches and getting paid before the bank realized the account backing the check didn’t have enough funds.
17/ Banks put fraud holds on some of the funds from each check. Congress eventually entered the fray in 1987 and passed the Expedited Funds Availability Act.

Bankers thought it was garbage. See this fun 1989 article from the MSP Fed Bank.

minneapolisfed.org/article/1989/e…
18/ The law got updated again in 2003 when Congress modernized e-checks and ACH as payment and presentment methods for U.S. banks.
19/ The law currently requires banks to make at least $200 (indexed to inflation, so about $225 today) of your paycheck available the next day. The bank gets some limited rights to still put risk holds on your funds, such as if you frequently overdraft.
20/ Most banks run on outdated systems with outdated risk management. So some stick to the $200 next day timing, then give the rest the day after. Chime gives you everything same day, hence the 2 days early claim.*

*Chimers, please correct me if I’m wrong.
21/ Okay, so to recap:

→ Most early paycheck products look like credit.
→ Chime speeds up ACH
→ Dave is banking for humans (but Dave is a bear?)

So what about the CFPB thing?
22/ The CFPB is saying that earned wage access products aren’t “credit” as that term is defined in federal Regulation Z. But it puts strings on its pronouncement.
23/ Strings (Part 1):

→ Have to contract with employers (so Dave = bad, Earnin and Even = maybe OK)

→ Amount of the advance can’t exceed the earned wages (all providers probably fine here)

→ No fees or tips allowed (so Dave = bad again, others = prob OK)
24/ Strings (Part 2):

→ Employee gets to choose account to receive the funds. If you give out a debit card, it needs to be V/MC/D/AMEX badged and allow some free ATM access.

→ CAN ONLY GET REPAID VIA PAYROLL DEDUCTION (problem for most)
25/ Strings (Part 3):

→ EWA provider has no legal claim to get repaid.

→ EWA provider discloses all of things upfront.

→ No credit assessment. Aka don’t dare touch FICO or CRA data.
26/ So the CFPB is saying they won’t look to apply Reg Z if you contract directly with the employer (like Even and Walmart do), you don’t charge fees AND you get paid out of the payroll run.
27/ That last part is going to be problematic for most of the companies in this space, as many of them are direct-to-consumer and sweep direct deposit funds from the consumer’s bank account. The CFPB’s Footnote 16 says [no bueno] to this model.
28/ Interesting, Section C of the CFPB’s letter highlights a quirk about Reg Z and why I think this advisory -- by itself -- is a non-event.

You need more than four repayments to fall under Reg Z.
29/ Legally, the Bureau staff did this right. You look to the definitions like "credit" first. But functionally, if the wage advance or EWA products only require one repayment, you get to the same outcome regardless of whether the product is deemed “credit” under Reg Z or not.
30/ If you are subject to Reg Z, you need to deal with various disclosures and sometimes apply an ability-to-pay test. That’s work (i.e., time, money, eng resources), and avoiding work is a good enough reason to not want Reg Z to apply.
31/ But if you can meet the Bureau’s standards under the new opinion and your product isn’t “credit” under Reg Z, arguably it also isn’t “credit” under fair lending laws and regs so you don’t need to comply with those either.
32/ Interestingly, the CFPB didn’t discuss whether the EWA products exempt from Reg Z are also exempt from Reg B (fair lending regs), but the pieces are there if an Even or Earnin wanted to weaponize this against their competitors.
33/ So let’s briefly recap:

→ Most wage advance products look like credit
→ the CFPB says some provider<>employer products aren’t credit
→ Reg Z probably doesn’t apply regardless

So why would someone ask the CFPB to opine?
34/ My thought is there is a larger policy project unfolding before our eyes. If the CFPB says its not credit, you can use that as precedent to ask New York, California or Ohio to reach the same conclusion.
35/ Some states have picked on early wage access providers, so I tip my hat to the policy folks and lawyers that thought to get the CFPB to weigh in. It was a nice chess move.
36/ Even, Earnin and other companies in this space provide a valuable service to consumers. I’m excited to see how these low- and no-fee providers evolve to improve worker financial well being.
37/ Do you work in this space? What do you think?

Do you want to work in this space? Most of these companies are hiring. So is Privacy. Check out our jobs page

angel.co/company/privac…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt

Matt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @regulatorynerd

18 Nov
1/ Am listening to the CFPB's consumer advisory committee meeting discussion on the Section 1033 consumer info sharing rule making and current market trends. Some notes and thoughts here.
2/ All the long-time Bureau folks seem to be here. Will Wade-Grey presented. Gary Stein is talking now. David Erich, an operator/founder/thought leader on the advisory committee is dialed in. 36 panelists in total. Other attendees listening in are hidden.
3/ For context, Section 1033 of the Dodd Frank Act lets the CFPB write rules to create an open banking regime. There's an open comment period right now. I plan on doing a deep dive in the next week or so and will likely write a comment letter in my capacity as a private citizen.
Read 57 tweets
16 Nov
Three year old has been walking around the house for a week talking about how she’s going to “punch Donald Trump in the B-U-T-T.”

Wife is asking her to unpack her plan while taking a bath. Live tweeting it here.
Wife: How are we going to get to DC.

3YO: Daddy will drive me.

Wife: it’s far.

3YO: He’ll drive all night.
Wife: How are you going to get into his house?

3YO: My friend Mila will knock on his door.

Wife: then what?
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov
1/ Lots of interesting nuggets on the PayPal earnings call. And Dan Shulman saying "regulators" four times in his opening remarks. Thread following here later tonight (Pacific time).
2/ pre-thread nugget -- after-hours trading going lower the more Dan Schulman and John Rainey talk about Q4 and dodge on 2021 forecasting. Was -$10 a share a few minutes ago. Rainey continues to take Q4 and 2021 forecast questions, and stock going lower (down $12 a share).
3/ @PolicyPitts - you doom scrolling late on the East Coast? Cause I'm back and a tweeting about the @PayPal earnings call.
Read 64 tweets
28 Aug
1/ .@alexh_johnson asked if I might weigh in on why the CFPB is requesting info on the U.S. consumer credit card market.

Buckle up for a tale of gun-toting senators, people being angry about mail, slow government regulators and Maxine Waters . . .
2/ First a brief detour --

Folks are angry due to the horrible incident with Jacob Blake. Regardless of how you feel about BLM or democrats, I bet you do have feelings about people.

I bet we can all agree keeping people alive is good, and US people should have the same rights.
3/ Almost done -- if you typically dismiss things like BLM, or raise what-about-isms to confirm your views, why not think differently for a few days? Maybe ask how you’d feel if your neighbors and and people that look like you kept getting shot just for doing normal things.
Read 37 tweets
3 Aug
.@noyesclt had a good blog post where he called @Square a potential loser due to @Apple's purchase of @mobeewave

I respectfully disagree with Tom. Square will remain the leader for next gen POS and SMB services. But Fiserv, and Visa and MC may have a new threat. Thread below.
First a story. I saw a demo two years ago where a large online acquirer (think Adyen-like) had someone take a tap payment via their cell phone. No extra hardware.

As a Square shareholder, I almost shit my pants.
I texted a few other folks in payments about what I saw (they had the chance, but missed the demo). We agreed Square would be toast.

Two years later, and Square is still chugging along and growing. So what gives?
Read 37 tweets
28 Jul
Glad @mengxilu flagged this. Affirm's rated securitization is a great spring board to chat (type?) about FinTech capital markets, valid-when-made and true lender issues.

Lots of recent developments in this space. Anyone else up for a thread? Then let's read on!
As a baby lawyer, I worked on MSB, CDO and eventually ABS card and auto deals. I was both law firm and in-house counsel. And I dealt with Reg AB, SEC Form ABS-15G reporting and also how to deal with risk retention.
ABS or asset-backed securitization has long been a critical funding tool for non-bank lenders, and even fledgling bank lenders.
Read 52 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!