THREAD. The fun of landscape history is that, quite often, it’s little, insignificant details in plain sight that reveal past now-lost landscapes. They turn a country walk into a detective story - like this amble in Comberton, Cambs., reconstructing its vanished village green.
2. All that’s left today is this small grassy area and duck pond at the centre of the village - jam-packed with signals to its communal function: village sign, gritting box, benches, litter bin, & a bus stop just out of shot on the L. The 19thC OS map shows even more of them ...
3. The duck pond is the rounded feature 117 just NW of the crossroads near the bottom of the map. Communal facilities in 1880 included a smithy, a malting for brewing beer, & the Red Lion (all plot 119); & a school & schoolteacher’s house across the road, as well as a maze ...
4. The maze has long been tarmac’d over (🧐).. the only extant (& poor) photo of it (comberton.org/wp-content/upl…) suggests it was a labyrinth cut into the turf, like the surviving ones at Hilton, Hunts. (photo davidpotter2012.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/sg1s94…) & Saffron Walden. I digress #blush
5. At any rate, there are lots of community facilities by the pond. But the 19thC malting, pub & smithy, & school & schoolhouse, each on enclosed plots are intriguing. So is the street sign: the ‘end’ of Green End usually signifies more than just a pond. Let’s follow the clues..
6. The far side of the green/pond is bounded by a 19thC wall, the E boundary of plot 118 on the OS. Its alignment is continued by the back boundary of the brewing/pub complex (plot 119). Let’s walk up Green End to look at the far end of that alignment, where it meets plot 121.
7. Here are the malting with its distinctive roof, smithy & pub. The smithy is now a garage & has taken over the malting; the pub has closed. The smithy/marking range is built of clay lump - large rectangular blocks of clay mixed with straw etc. & drilled into bricks.
8. The technique is distinctively early 19thC onwards in Cambs. & very different from the cob houses found elsewhere. It’s a material used by the poorer sort & I’ll tell you more about it another day. Anyhow I love these clay buildings. Here’s an excellent introduction for now.
9. Well, we’ve walked up to the other end of the back boundary to plot 119 and look! There’s a break in the walling at exactly that point. Brick running further back; & breeze blocks towards the road - they replaced the original clay lump wall that gradually fell down 😥
10. Could this mark an earlier edge to the green? Enclosure was in 1839 so it seems the malting etc were built on the enclosed verge of the green. I’ve marked the alignment here. Let’s see whether there’s any further evidence.
11. Next stop is at the gates of plot 121. Look carefully and you can see a ridge, an earlier edge to the green, running from the gravel towards the L of the picture. And that’s not all ..
12. Here we are at the N boundary of plot 121 - on the map it makes a change in alignment where a 19thC yellow brick wall meets an earlier, 17thC red brick wall running out from the house. After this it becomes more difficult as there’s been modern building across the line but ..
13. .. the frontage of the 3 early 18thC cottages (now 1 house, I think) in plot 123 also follows the alignment (listing british-history.ac.uk/rchme/cambs/vo…).
14. As a general rule, most pre-enclosure houses fronted directly onto the street. They didn’t have front gardens. So one can trace the street line from the buildings. (gamlingayphotos.co.uk/church-street-…). The eagle-eyed among you will have spotted ...
15. ... that the frontage of the 17thC house behind the 19thC yellow-brick boundary wall that we started with wasn’t on our alignment; & the clay lump wall ended at a 19thC wall; & neither did the frontage of the early 18thC house in plot 121 lie on the alignment. So...
16. .. so the alignment we’re reconstructing wasn’t that of the first encroachment on the green - there were earlier ones. We’ve got about as far as we can along the W side. Can we reconstruct the rest of the green? Yes, we can - & quite quickly, in just 3 steps.
17. The next important clue is this house, jettied along its length on the side facing away from the road and set well back from it. It was originally unseated, built without a hearth or chimney, & that - plus the jettying along the long side - suggests it may have been a late ..
18. .. medieval guildhall, like this much grander one in Whittlesford. These were not craft guilds, but community organisations to support the poor. Our one in Comberton lies in well away from any path - feasibly in the middle of a large open space. (british-history.ac.uk/rchme/cambs/vo…)
19. And it’s back boundary is an alignment to runs continuously all the way back into the village. What does that boundary look like on the ground? Well, ..
20. .. it’s a really substantial ditch carrying a small stream. And that’s typical of many greens: that their boundaries were ditched. (That there isn’t a ditch on the W side may be another indication that we weren’t finding the original edge to the green.)
21. Turn around with your back to the ditch and look! The low ridges formed by #medieval ploughing. The E side of the green abutted onto the great open fields of the village. Perhaps the ditch was *that* big to prevent stock from straying from the green into the crops.
22. That ditch continues on a much smaller scale down Hines Lane as it leads back into the village. It’s disappeared by the end of the lane & instead a high-ish bank shows how the edge of the green has been built up over long time by hedging and the passage of feet.
23. Round the corner & we’re back at the duck pond. Small accessible signs, together telling a story, in a game everyone can play. It’s why I get such a thrill from landscape history - what can beat being being out of doors on a micro-exploration? END
This terrific lidar image from @thebelliw shows the medieval plough ridges around the village

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Susan Oosthuizen

Prof Susan Oosthuizen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSueOosthuizen

14 Oct
THREAD. Here’s a story about how I went looking for the obvious in a landscape and found something much more interesting. The place was Isleham, on the NE Cambs fen-edge & the initial hook was an early 12thC chapel, almost all that remains of a Breton priory..
2. ...founded within a generation of the Conquest. Today, only the priory chapel remains. It was converted into a barn & remained in agricultural use until the mid-20thC.
british-history.ac.uk/vch/cambs/vol1…
3. The lovely chapel is said to be ‘the best example in the country of a small .. substantially unaltered.. Benedictine priory church’. Its original 12th-century walls all survive; the raised nave roof is the only major change. More interesting tho ... english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/i…
Read 28 tweets
31 Aug
Brilliant evisceration by #Stefan #Collini of consumerism in higher education & analysis of what’s needed so that #universities can properly play their part (& it’s only a part) in supporting a drive to social equity & justice
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
‘One of the most obvious is between our de facto endorsement of a bitterly class-divided society and our fantasy that universities can not only escape the consequences of this but can positively correct it. We seem, for example, to be willing to allow wealthy parents to buy...
educational advantage for their children up to the age of 18, but then we believe that this advantage can somehow be made to have no consequences for their educational trajectory thereafter....’
Read 8 tweets
19 Aug
The Iron Age earthwork at Borough Fen is one of several #prehistoric enclosures built near the borders of the fen wetlands to manage large #communal herds of cattle grazing on the damp #pastures in summer, were centres for autumn roundups & seasonal assemblies for managing both. ImageImage
It lies in the same #common wetland grazed by the whole of the #medieval Soke of Peterborough; that was the early medieval common pasture of the 5th/6thC Gyrwe (‘fen people’); & which, @PryorFrancis’s work suggests, had been common through prehistory. Image
There’s another at Stonea Camp, and others at Tattershall Thorpe in Lincs. and Arbury Camp on the outskirts of Cambridge https://t.co/y0atadNEZD
Read 5 tweets
9 Aug
The atmospheric earthworks of the deserted #medieval village of Nobold, Northants., first recorded in 1284 - the main street, house plots & their back yards clearly visible. Most of the house sites & yards were ploughed up after abandonment (of which more, in a moment) ... (1/3)
2. You can tell ploughing happened after the village was abandoned as the blocks of ridges are bounded by the ditches that divided one property from the next. Is it possible to tell when it was abandoned? Well, maybe ...
3. First: when was it deserted? We don’t know. There are only some fragmentary records. In 1459 there were just 2 houses standing on 1 of the 3 manors with tenants in the village; but we don’t know the situation on the other 2 manors. By the early 18thC abandonment was complete.
Read 7 tweets
31 Jul
THREAD. This entry is typical of the Cambs. #Domesday Book (1086).
1st, it lists the major landowners after the Norman Conquest - here at Barton, Humphrey was Guy de Raimbeaucourt’s tenant in 1086.
2nd (& this is what I’m interested in) it lists the landowners *before* ... Image
2. ... 1066. As you can see, there were 24 of them & they were all free men - they could grant and sell their land without permission from anyone else. They didn’t ‘belong’ to a manor, but farmed independently.
And DB tells us a number of other interesting things about them ... Image
3. They were commended to the king for patronage and protection, & in return performed specific services for him - in this case they carted his goods, people, crops, etc.from one place to another, & they provided a mounted escort for the Sheriff when he undertook official duties. Image
Read 19 tweets
10 Jul
THREAD. The origins of English villages like Spaldwick, Hunts., so typical of the rural landscape, is a question that’s puzzled historians and archaeologists for generations. (Photo from Christopher Taylor’s masterfully annotated 1988 re-edition of Hoskins’ classic book.)
2. Most people in rural prehistoric and Roman Britain tended to live in farms and hamlets dispersed around the landscape (though for a qualification of this generalisation see Christopher Taylor’s 1983 Village & Farmstead). Take the archaeology of Doddington, Northants 👉....
3. .. mapping the archaeological evidence (filled red circles) of Romano-British settlement at Doddington shows settlement scattered between a villa (bottom, R) & 3 farmsteads lying to its east (Source: british-history.ac.uk/rchme/northant…). What about after 400 AD?
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!