Supreme Court bench led by Justice AM Khanwilkar to resume hearing a petition seeking guidelines for courts to not impose bail conditions objectifyig women especially through bail orders in sexual violence cases.
Attorney General was issued notice in the case. AG KK Venugopal has informed #SupremeCourt that gender sensitisation training for judges and more women judges in judiciary could be a solution.
Justice Khanwilkar: we have seen your written note, Mr Venugopal
Senior Adv Sanjay Parikh reads the directions he is seeking from the court: I have cited State of UP vs Madan Lal..
SC: Passing it over. We can't find the papers.
Court resumes hearing.
Attorney General: All lawyers should undergo a training of two to three years with regard to gender sensitization. Teachers should be dedicated to this subject and be taught to them. Sensitization of judges by State Judicial Academies is needed
AG: When an accused is granted bail in cases of sexual violence and is a neighbour of victim then protection needs to be given so that acid throwing instances or witness coercion does not take place.
AG: Judges who are from the old school and are patriarchal needs to be sensitized
Senior Advocate Parikh reads his notes.
Supreme Court bench reserves order in the case.
SC: We will pass necessary orders
Matter over
"Judges who are from old school and patriarchal need to be sensitised," Attorney General KK Venugopal tells Supreme Court
The Kerala High Court will shortly hear a bail application moved by former Kerala bureaucrat M. Sivasankar in connection to his alleged role and arrest in the #keralagoldsmugglingcase
He moved the Kerala High Court on November 20 seeking regular bail.
He had earlier moved the Kerala High Court seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending arrest in investigations conducted by the Customs Department and the ED. @dir_ed barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Within an hour of the Kerala High Court dismissing his pre-arrest bail plea, he was arrested by the ED and taken into custody.
His subsequent bail plea before an Ernakulam PMLA Court was junked.
CJI: not possible for us to accept a compensation in merely arithmetical terms especially when there is no statement forthcoming from Uttar Pradesh or PWD as to nature of trees that is to say they are classified as shrubs or large trees
CJI: Moreover there is no information available regarding age of the trees since its obvious that there cannot be compensatory reforestation if 100 year old tree is cut down. Ms Bhati, ASG for UP did not make a statement as to which forest dept intends to evaluate trees in Q
Dr AM Singhvi for Vedanta- wastage of national resource can be stopped by allowing short 3 month run of the plant. I'm not arguing on merits
There is a preconceived decision to not allow the plant to run
Justice Nariman- you've had this plea for short runs for 2 years.
@DrAMSinghvi- the short run would allow us to identify any issues still remaining. The plant started in 1997. Provides direct employment to 4000 people, indirect employment to about 20,000.
Singhvi: Trickle down dependants are more than 2 lakh. Supplying 36% of the country's copper needs. Now India is becoming dependant on Copper imports.
NEERI had made environment impact report and gave 30 recommendations. Compliance of 29 out of 30
#MadrasHighCourt takes up for final hearing petitions challenging privilege committee proceedings issued against MK Stalin and other DMK MLAs for bringing gutka packets to Legislative Assembly in 2017. In Sept, the Court had stayed the proceedings.
The matter is before Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana.
Senior Advocate Shanmugasundaram is making arguments for @mkstalin
Shanmugasundaram recounts that privilege committee proceedings were initiated against 19 persons citing:
- display of prohibited gutkha without permission of Speaker
- the disturbance caused to assembly proceedings,
- setting a bad precedent, and
- causing disorder, disrepute
Supreme Court bench headed by Justice NV Ramana hears a plea against the publication of the #Hathras victim photograph in the media. Plea also questions the delay in trial of sexual violence cases #SupremeCourt
Justice Ramana: These issues have nothing to do with law. People want to do such things. Right to freedom of expression is there. There is enough law for this. It is unfortunate that such incidents happen
SC: We can't legislate law after law. Its not for the wisdom of the court to legislate here. Make representation to the govt