Large Farmers to Middle men to Large Farmers - The vicious cycle
Punjab is an agriculturally developed but land scarce economy. The ownership of land is an economic asset and carries a social prestige in the society. The small farmers find it difficult to keep their land intact.
The number of operational holdings in the state was 11.17 lakh in 1990-91, which declined to 9.97 lakh in 2000-01. The picture of small farmers (< 5 acres of land) was very precarious as their number has declined from 5 lakh to about 3 lakh during this period.
This shows that about 2 lakh small farmers have either leased out or sold their entire land or part of it. A report on the status of farmers who left farming in Punjab states that out of 2 lakh families who left farming, about 36 per cent families have sold their entire land
whereas another 11.4 per cent families have sold part of their land.
The field survey of the Research study from which I am quoting these reveals that about 10 per cent farmers sold their means of production including land, tractor, farm implements and other assets like
livestock, gold ornaments, and trees to repay the loan. Some of these farmers sold their assets even at distress prices due to the continuous pressure of the commission agents. Another recent field survey on ‘land market in rural Punjab’ reveals that in land sold to
commission agents by the farmers, the buyers were largely non- traditional commission agents. This is a new trend of purchasing land of the farmers by the commission agents. The traditional commission agents are least interested in purchasing the land of the farmers;
if they purchase, they try to recover their disbursed amount by diverting it through the large farmers under some specific mechanism. Sometimes, they extend the financial support to the medium and large farmers for purchasing the land of indebted farmers.
In this way, they recover their loan ‘on paper’ merely by diverting these loans from the distressed peasantry towards medium and large farmers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After AAP sacking YoYa in 2015, he started campaigning for Farmers in Haryana & Punjab. Gave a lot of interviews during this period till 2019 Lok Sabha election.
No mention of Middlemen in any of these interviews. Not even once.
All his interviews focused only on increasing MSP
He spoke of everything except middlemen in this interview in 2018. Demonetisation affected but no mention of middlemen anywhere google.co.in/amp/s/amp.scro…
In July 2017, in a public function the Arhyiyas felicitated Amarinder Singh with the title of ‘Fakhr-e-Quam’(Pride of the Community).
Post that function, the CM had said it would be difficult to waive off the debt owed by farmers to the arhtiyas.
As many as 86% of farmer & 80% of agricultural labours are mired in debt, says a study on Indebtedness among Farmers & Agricultural Labourers in Rural Punjab.
Its authors, researchers at Punjabi University, Patiala, say over a fifth of that debt was owed to commission agents and moneylenders.
No less than 8,294 farmers took their own lives between 2000 & 2015, says a study presented last year before the Vidhan Sabha’s Committee.
Gross Value Added: Agri & Allied Industries (GVA is Selling - Production Cost)
₹ in Lakh Crores
🚜 Punjab: 0.9
States with less output but more profits than Punjab.
🚜 Maha : 1.9
🚜 AP: 1.8
🚜 WB: 1.4
🚜 TN : 1.2
Who is eating all the profits in Punjab?
Reasons for Farmer Protests only in Punjab:
⚡️ Middlemen left out - Huge revenue loss
⚡️ 1800 Mandi tax per year is gone
⚡️ Akali dal split in two; they want to use this to counter the insurgency
⚡️ Khalistan separatists looking for a launch pad
⚡️ State ruled by congress