The thread you see here, from yesterday, is 60 tweets long. I call these my long threads. I've done hundreds and hundreds. This one is broken. I will speculate why, below.
2) If you read many long threads here at Twitter, you realize that they're actually designed to only go up to 31 tweets. There you have to hit a button that looks like this.
3) As a long thread writer, there are tricks of the trade you have to learn to prevent your threads from being broken. Each tweet needs to link to all the tweets above. I think my longest thread - and it was unbroken - was something like 160 tweets. I don't break threads.
4) This is where yesterday's thread got broken. I feel pretty certain that Twitter is NOT happy with @GenFlynn's message, forwarding @Rothbard1776's analysis.
5) Funny thing, and I just checked, if you click on the embedded link above, and go to #37, you'll be able to scroll up and down through all 60 tweets. Twitter's shenanigans are often imperfect. I suspect they're designed that way, as most won't figure out the workaround anyway.
6) One more fact. I believe yesterday's entire thread took about 2 1/2 hours to compose and post, or so, maybe 3. The first tweet had, as you can see, the full @marklevinshow link that worked just fine when posted. Just after completion, the video was removed from YouTube.
7) It is a conceit for me to think I caused that, but, well, I am sometimes a bit of a conceited fellow. I think yesterday's thread lead to the rapid take down of the video. I'm probably wrong, but it's a fun thought.
8) If Twitter hadn't broken my thread at #37, I wouldn't have shared my conceit. Some of you will recall that a couple of weeks ago, I was slapped into Twitter Penalty Box for 3 different 12-hour punishments. I won't discuss the specifics, but I will guess at one thing.
9) It is public knowledge that Facebook has a team of Chinese Censors. It is public knowledge that Google works with China complying happily with every whim of the CCP. Who can imagine that Twitter doesn't also?
11) Okay, I have to tell you just a little about how I got slapped into penalty box 3 times. Each time I tested it, and the 3rd time I got to the bottom of it. Revenge Porn is forbidden here at Twitter. It's a policy. Porn is okay, but not Revenge Porn. No kidding.
12) The 1st 2 times they penalized me, they didn't tell me why. Just a vague statement that I'd violated community guidelines and that I should behave myself better in future. The 3rd time they decided to fess up. Lying, they tagged a link I posted as if it were Revenge Porn.
13) Between the 3 times, and the testing I did, I was able to determine a broad category of links that are likely to get falsely tagged that way, and have not been penalized since. I have no question that there are Twitter Chinese Censors and that they don't like those links.
14) So far, every time I post #37, it continues to work. Why might that be? It's virtually impossible to pretend it breaks Twitter's community guidelines, as it does not in any way. So, just use it to break the thread, but that's all.
15) So, in conclusion, let's continue to workaround Twitter's evil policies. Please do click on #37. And, if you enjoy my entire long thread, RT at least the 1st tweet. You might also RT #s 36 & 38 just for good measure.
Ha!
Broken Thread Update ends at #15.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What makes an innocent man plead guilty? There is a lie in America. The lie is that Judges, Courts, Prosecutors are honest. They prosecute for Justice, we're told. They do not.
2) I certainly did not know how to interpret Obama's attack against Flynn on November 10, 2016. I also had no idea how to deal with the transition itself. All of us who gave everything we had to the campaign had no clue what to do with victory. We hadn't thought about it.
3) Not that we hadn't thought about victory. It was our every thought for months and months. We thought about nothing else. Inside that nothing else was what to do with victory once we had it. Not a clue. Not a thought. Certainly, I didn't.
2) The band was in disguise, but my 16-year old sister spotted them, knew them, and ran right up to them. She bribed them on the spot. She said, "You can talk to me and my mom and brother, or I'll start screaming that you're you." It was the coolest thing she ever did.
3) Geniuses that they were, they knew their gig was up, and complied with my mighty sister. Then, a problem arose. Jim started talking to me as opposed to her. I was 9, and dressed up like the complete square that I was. Wrong plaids combined. Short hair. Etcetera.
Today's work will have even more moving parts than usual. But one part more important than any other is last night's @marklevinshow's historically transformational episode.
2) That Mark is a hero almost goes without saying. He is, but I had almost lost faith in him last week. Watched about 3 minutes and turned to other entertainment. Why? There is ONLY one story in America today. If you're not talking about election fraud you're not worth the time.
3) The MAGA Movement enters our story here. FOX's rating have hit lows that did more than stun the executives, it even inspired some real thinking. I don't know the editorial process. I do know, they cut Mark loose last night and he took the ball and ran all the way.
We shall return to Publius Huldah's guiding light, today. We begin first with a fascinating analysis from a new thought leader I'd never heard of before yesterday. Check this out!
2) I just followed @Pouissant1 and I'm recommending you should too. Let's talk about her guidance. Fraud VITIATES. Joe Biden has attempted to defraud the 2020 election. He has been caught. That defaults to Trump's absolute victory. It's the law. This is what she's telling us.
3) I'll leave the term "vitiate" to her thread. In our terms, Biden lost, due to cheating. Cheaters, when caught, lose. That's how it works. Our nation is not only legal, it's logical. Cheaters lose. Hang with that. You cheat, you lose.
I'm going to practice a new skill right now. Without any further study for the moment, I'm going to expand the view, mark it up, and then comment. Join me! Do your own mark up too!
2) Before I get started, that's how today's work is going to go. That is, I will actually study together with you. I'm going to try to keep this coherent as we go, but - and I have to talk about this for a moment - it's taken us a long time to get here.
3) Not only do we NOT know our jobs as governmental power delegators, our hires, those fellow citizens we delegate the power of governance to ALSO do not know their jobs. Hell, I confess, I just learned yesterday that I delegate governance to the governors.
2) Dave told me that it's author, Publius Huldah, is one of his most trusted and respected authorities on all things constitutional. He encouraged me to go slowly with the article, contemplating each point carefully. That's what we're going to do together, here.
3) What's more, we're going to be build our Constitution reading skills while we're at it. As I started studying, I realized that I have never grown comfortable with the Constitution's format, in reading it. I get it, but I've not spent much time doing it.