The feedback structures in high-order nonlinear feedback systems persistently draw attention away from high-leverage points (social change), towards low-leverage points (technology, consumption).
https://twitter.com/climatelauren/status/1336403689209131010
We need to learn to distinguish symptoms (greenhouse gas emissions) from causes (structures that generate activities causing direct or embodied GHG emissions). Yet most sustainability and climate science focuses on symptoms that cannot possibly solve deeper structural problems.
just a quick reminder to whomsoeverhereontwitter it concerns that when we call out <deep structural systemic problems that currently have no solutions> that may sound like 'giving up' to y'all (but just because you read shallowly); I never say that, it's lit a problem of language
Most typical & most often misunderstood example: poor Roy Scranton RIP his twitter account
--so long, if y'all know whatever I just said, take it as a sign that you're too deep into climate & should get out more :)
//not sure this helps anyone, but ~
ht @dvoryane :)
--so long, if y'all know whatever I just said, take it as a sign that you're too deep into climate & should get out more :)
//not sure this helps anyone, but ~
ht @dvoryane :)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
