1/ Ranking Minority Brady is supposedly meeting w/ W&M chair Neal in the am as a "Grand Bargain" is perhaps coming together after pressure from @SpeakerPelosi on #SMB--w/ no legislative language socialized 2 anyone in the doc community--2 of 4 corners in Senate remain opposed.
2/ Let's bolster the oppo w/ the simple message that we don't sign off on deals where there's no language + how about the bills that physicians passed in #NY#TX & #GA tens of millions of Pts are out of the middle due to physician lead bills--don't suggest "we're the party of no"
4/ The "Grand Bargain" on #SMB has apparently been reached w/ Chm. Neal & Ranking Minority Brady & will be announced this morning 12/11/20--details are not known at present but hopefully we will actually see the legislative language today or soon. #suprisemedicalbilling
5/ outline of details only so far--SMB Grand Bargain details outline:
1.Interim reimbursement but no set standard (health plans determine);
2.Batching of claims
3.Single list of IDR criteria=median in network, prior K history, case complexity, quality, plan + .....
6/ physician market share (latter is completely new and off the wall);
4.Adjudicator may ask for additional info outside of criteria
5.Either side can argue for inclusion of other criteria.
7/ From reliable sources--still would couch as a rumor--"The rumor now is a deal has been struck and language may be released at 4:30PM ET."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ New #SMB data from #TX@TexasTDI --great & timely report--hot read as follows, data from 1/1/20 to 10/31/20--a. 32,036 IDRs filed, 86% from @EmergencyDocs, 7% anesthesia & 5% other specialties; b. Settlements (after IDR is filed)--clinicians are receiving +4.43X of the ....
2/ initial health plan reimbursement; c. when the adjudicator decides the IDR, clinicians are receiving 4.74X of the initial reimbursement from the health plan. The latter figure has come down from 5.3X when the IDR is adjudicated based on the first 6 month's report.......
@sonodoc99@mssnytweet@CNBC 2/ @pfizer CEO on @CNBC said that they have 50M doses ready for ‘20 & 1.3B doses scheduled for ‘21 + no negative implications were reported yet the firm does not have visibility into the panel’s specific data set + Pt cohort ranges from 84 to 12 yrs. old....
1/ POTUS Executive Order (EO) is potentially back on & here’s the outline on the terms & conditions—the EO has been drafted—whether he announces it in the Queen's City today & that he’ll sign it is another open issue: #medtwitter 1. The prohibition on surprise medical billing...
2/ will be linked to the hospital’s conditions of participation (CoPs); 2. By law, physicians do not have CoPs—hospitals have them—so this may be an immediate potential legal argument against his actions; 3. The EO would pit hospitals against the physicians credentialed....
3/ at the hospital; 4. The concept is “network matching” & was raised during the E&C committee hearings and rejected by the committee as a solution—require that every physician group credentialed by the hospital “match” the hospital’s network of health plans; 5. The hospitals
1/ As reported in PoliticoPro –
Trump preparing executive orders on health care this week
By Susannah Luthi, Daniel Lippman, Dan Diamond
09/22/2020 02:51 PM EDT
President Donald Trump is planning to announce a series of executive actions on health care as soon as Thursday...
2/ & one EO is expected to be on #surprisemedicalbilling --been rumored for months & details are not known--last WH idea was outright ban on OON/BB w/ no mechanism for physicians & health plans to resolve $ disputes but Pts would be protected--WH COS Meadows was against ....
3/ benchmarking when he represented Asheville NC in the US House--legal authority of POTUS here very questionable as it relates specifically (but not limited to) to ACA and ERISA plans as those have specific Congressional statutes authorizing same--physicians have been approached
1/ So the #TX health plans--after supporting the solution to #surprisemedicalbilling which passed unanimously--are now pointing fingers--lets consider the facts--1. per the TX Dept. of Insurance (TDI), when clinicians informally settle their dispute before the formal dispute ....
2/ resolution process (IDR), the plans are settling for 4X of the original reimbursement paid; when clinicians go thru the IDR process, the independent dispute adjudicator is awarding >5.3X of the plan's initial reimbursement--based on TDI's report of the 1st 6 months--see charts
3/ So the original plan reimbursements are unreasonably low--one could reasonably conclude--so low that the plans are willing to pay 4X in settlement before IDR--& the Pts are protected & removed from the IDR process--the statutory factors for determining the final $ are strong
@CMSGov issued ‘21 Medicare #Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Final Rule w/ comment period & the news is not good —the Medicare “conversion factor” which applies to physicians & other clinicians is proposed to decline >10.5% in ‘21—happy reading > 1350 pgs cms.gov/files/document…
2/ Major expansion of #telehealth per the press release, details to follow.
3/ major hospital based specialists will be significantly cut in’21 by Medicare in the midst of a global pandemic—@EmergencyDocs -6%, anesthesiologists-8%, radiology -11% and IR -9%. Congress & @CMSGov here they come—Table 90, page 899.