Some thoughts on the #DMA, while reading it.
"Weak contestability"??? Really? Leading to "less choice and innovation to the detriment of European consumers"? I am sorry, whut?!
Not so sure about that. The DSA is a truth-seeker (corresponding to the state of technical advances: impossible to prevent ALL illegal content > obligation to spot it after publication), while the DMA is a truth-teller (do's and don'ts). It's a much, much different philosophy.
🔮🔮🔮🔮
When a (legal) category is THAT broad, it's not a category anymore, it's a tote bag. We need more granularity (more on that coming soon). #totebag
= cheers to legal certainty. 🥂
So... one decision (Google Shopping) = sufficient experience (when it comes to self-preferencing).
This is *not cool*. There has been no dialogue between the EC and the overall academic community. Organizing a conference/report with pre-designated experts, and asking for contributions while not responding to them is NOT a dialogue. What a missed opportunity.
Ah, OK, so DMA = let's do things although we can't prove why.
Really? I want to see the numbers!
This stems from the GDPR experience (benefiting big tech by putting a heavier burden – comparatively – on SMEs).
Curious: I thought the "platform economy" wasn't dynamic (page 1)? So... the EC says it is – for potentially imposing more obligations, but also that it is not – for justifying the first obligations. 🧐
Correct, but it's not an infinite game.
Empirical study showing that it's way more complex as these "super-supra-invincible-platforms" also compete (very actively) against each other: global.oup.com/academic/produ… (by @CompetitionProf).
Yeah, it's complex. And? Let's gather more expertise (amazon.com/Complexity-Eco…), rather than creating some legal rules which do not match reality.
Good to know for business executives: you have been offering a great service for 3 years, over 3 member States: no need to worry anymore, you won the market.
Why not, but one question: the EC doesn't have the mean to be pro-active in cartel cases (90% of cases are reactive according to the OECD). So, how will this impact EC capacities? Does it mean even less proactivity in other fields? Does it mean a bigger budget is being discussed?
This is post-Android decision. Makes sense (already covered by 102 c, though).
NEW: the EC is now considering technical aspects – and not only contractual ones. Yay: leconcurrentialiste.com/predatory-inno….
The EC says the DMA is complementing competition law, and then copy-paste the statement of objections against Amazon (article 102)?! Also, this is going after a business model!
I surely understand the logic, but in practice? Photos are portable, OK. But what about... everything that is *only* possible on one of these services?
Whut? So... having a great product is bad for competition? Learning effects are now barriers to entry, and should be preventing/distributed?
Andd.... the (soon to be famous) break-up part. So, if a gatekeeper’s size + the economic dependency of business users and end users increase = potential break-up.
Go figure it out = 💰💰💰 for law firms and economic consultants.
Reading between the lines, the EC is saying: the Bundeskartellamt's decision against FB is NOT competition law (which I agree with, as the practice is secret = can't be an abuse OF a dominant position, unless the secrecy is permitted by the dominance).
So... wait: we protect competitors, and not competition? Well.. yeah. Too bad, I liked telling my American friends we were not doing that in Europe.
Overall:

1 – I've probably missed lots of important points. I'll get back to it first thing tomorrow morning.

2 – NOTHING on (1) new technologies, (2) management (what's happening inside the firm), (3) market dynamism. No empirical work quoted (at least, I haven’t found any).
3 – Welcome back ordo-liberalism, welcome back structuralism, welcome back the 60s. Ciao Darwin (I liked you). Now is time to listen to The Kinks again, I mean… The Who. I mean... not the Kinks.
Also: here's my take on #DMA vs. #DSA
(rather than DMA & DSA).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thibault Schrepel

Thibault Schrepel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LeConcurrential

22 Oct
A few (non-exhaustive) points that caught my attention while reading the new Google antitrust case – U.S. version.

Link: justice.gov/opa/press-rele….
1– Although the background part talks quite a lot about "specialized search providers such as Amazon, Expedia, or Yelp", the part about anti-competitive practices is solely about (potential) foreclosure against other general search engines. Weird.
2– This is not an accurate portrait of how tech companies work. There's no certainty in digital markets – as shown by Google numerous failures (you know, Google Glass, Google+, Hangouts…). For an empirical work illustrating this point, see @competitionprof latest book.
Read 9 tweets
21 Sep
I watched The Social Dilemma last night (imdb.com/title/tt114648…). A thread:
1- I couldn’t help but asking myself the following question all along: do they see the irony in arguing the tech industry is killing democracy on...... Netflix (and that most people will hear about it through social media)??! Anyway, pass the irony, let me get a closer look.
2- To be sure, the tech industry is asking some very important questions and creating issues. What we should NOT be doing is addressing them without considering how to preserve the positive aspects—more on that at law.mit.edu/pub/lawandtech….
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!