Thread by @Lidsville

Quick #SiteC update:
1. It is widely reported that @jjhorgan has the Milburn #SiteC report but hasn't told the public. Release the unredacted report now; it's ours.
2. The current #bcpoli Leg session ends Thursday. It would be classic Horgan to make a statement late Friday..

3. There have been a number of signs that the BC govt, various #SiteC boosters like Marc Jaccard, and Fed Minister of Environment @JonathanWNV are gearing up to produce reasons to pass #SiteC (ignoring its geotechnical instability)... #bcpoli

4. A study recently out of Alberta (odd timing) looks at #SiteC economics & concludes it's only worthwhile to go ahead if it feeds electricity to Alberta under certain conditions (which can't be met). It ignores the fact that greener, cheaper alternatives to #SiteC exist..

5. When CBC asked @JonathanWNV about #SiteC with respect to the federal climate plan, he dodged the question & out of nowhere dropped (in an almost fanboy manner) Mark Jaccard's name. That's a bad sign; Jaccard is a longtime #SiteC booster. What are Horgan/feds cooking up?

All of the above ignores #SiteC's geotechnical instability. Ben Parfitt's recent exposé showed that there's no #SiteC safety watchdog: BCUC is out, & the "independent" engineer turns out to be Hydro insider. Has Milburn consulted ANY fully independent engineers? Public is in dark