@Kevin_McKernan@BrunnerCreative@ScottAdamsSays@vgttrom@JamesTodaroMD Uganda had 0 deaths out of >1000 cases until they stopped using HCQ in July. Two days later the deaths began and they shot up to nearly a 10% CFR from 0% very quickly before getting a handle on "treatment without medicine".
@Kevin_McKernan@BrunnerCreative@ScottAdamsSays@vgttrom@JamesTodaroMD South Africa was one of the first recipients of HCQ from India upon lifting the export ban April 11. CFR collapsed as soon as the medicine got there. Then South Africa stopped usage Aug 5 and CFR went back up.
@Kevin_McKernan@BrunnerCreative@ScottAdamsSays@vgttrom@JamesTodaroMD And here's the important part: hardly any of these nations were using anything close to "optimal treatment plan" which would be 1. Early (first 5 days) 2. With a macrolide, zinc, Vit C/D (at least, maybe other vits and mins).
There is a strangely organized rumor going around that the AMA passed a resolution recognizing the efficacy of HCQ and calling on a reversal of its suppression. Unfortunately, that resolution was not passed, but I suggest the story is more interesting than that...
When you think about it, the resolution never had a chance of passing. Intuitively, we all know this. The AMA and Pharma are far too intertwined, and further with the government. Suggesting that the resolution could pass would be to suggest there was no opposition to begin with.
But here is the interesting part: Almost nobody, save for the few of us doing broad levels of research on the topic, knew to step in and correct the mistake. What does that mean?
As a consistent third party voter living in a state that wasn't going to swing a close election, I don't vote R or D.
But this is the time to throw weight behind an investigation into the possibility of a stolen election. We must investigate the statistical evidence.
So, let us investigate the statistical evidence broadly and as a community. Carefully and honestly. Benford's law is a clever technique, but there is an underlying reason behind it that should be understood to best apply the fundamental test.
The reason behind it is that population pools grow exponentially, so they move through orders of magnitude at an invariant rate. If we take the logarithm, the results are then linear. Discarding the integer parts, the fraction parts should form a uniform distribution.
1. This thread is a bit of comic relief from the pandemic.
2. Somewhere, out in the Ocean, a beautiful and thriving civilization spans the island of Pandemos. Larger in land size than Australia, you might miss it on a map, er, due to distortions in scale caused by Mercator projection.
3. The lush and resourceful Pandemos has allowed for the Pandemosians to engineer an amazing modern society.
1. This is a thread compiling the most interesting threads of the 2020 pandemic. If you've seen a thread or even a single epic tweet that you think belongs, share it and I'll consider adding it.
2. The #LancetGate may get a few mentions along the way.
How did anyone who handle the Surgisphere study prior to publication think it would look real?
1. This thread is about a statistical phenomenon called a Simpson's paradox and how it relates to the #Hydroxychloroquine research that gets so hotly debated.
A more complete version of this analysis will appear in my next book #TheChloroquineWars.
2. If you are unfamiliar with Simpson's paradoxes, you can read up on the basics here. However, the example I present may well teach the concept. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%2…
3. Consider three hospitals with different treatment policies. Perhaps the standard of care (SoC) is uniform, for the sake of simplicity, but the hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment policies are different.
1. This is a very brief story about how two members of the U.S. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel hid their financial disclosures with Gilead Sciences, makers of remdesivir...
2. Exhibit A: On April 22, Rajesh Gandhi and Pablo Tebas disclosed financial relationships with Gilead Sciences.
3. Exhibit B: Sometime between then and now, Rajesh Gandhi and Pablo Tebas retracted their disclosures of financial relationships with Gilead Sciences.