I don't see any way to avoid seeing this last-minute R demand that the Fed be hobbled as economic sabotage — an attempt to increase the odds of a financial crisis on Biden's watch 1/ nytimes.com/2020/12/17/us/…
It's true that financial markets are currently operating smoothly — precisely because the Fed stepped in back in March, when we came very close to a catastrophic financial meltdown 2/
Of course, this happened under Obama too: Rs attacked the Fed for trying to do its job. But back then they at least tried to offer a rationale, making (false) predictions of runaway inflation 3/
They also engaged in conspiracy theories, accusing the Fed of bailing out the Obama administration in the face of (nonexistent) fiscal crisis 4/ krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/mon…
But this time they're barely even trying to cover up their motives. Toomey is claiming that Fed facilities might be used to funnel aid to blue states, with no plausible theory of how that might happen 5/
Now, few people are predicting a renewed financial crisis — but then, financial crises are almost by definition unpredictable, bc if people knew they were coming they would have happened already. Tying the Fed's hands is just a way to ensure that the worst might happen 6/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulkrugman

20 Dec
Still thinking about the R effort — apparently abandoned as a practical matter — to prevent the Fed from acting to prevent crises. I still think sabotage was the main motive. But I wonder also whether the Fed's very integrity upset them. 1/
One of the shocking things about the past four years was the ease with which Trump undermined the professionalism of technocratic agencies, from the Weather Service to, of course, the CDC. But the Fed, protected by its quasi-independence, remained competent 2/
In particular, it quickly controlled a financial crisis that for 2 weeks looked worse than the fall of Lehman 3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec
Watching the spectacle of Trump's final days makes me think about ... interest rates. Bear with me a minute 1/
If you follow economics you may be aware how the consensus keeps predicting a return to normal interest rates, which keeps not happening 2/
Sample chart 3/
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec
Putting the Republican attempt to hobble the Fed in perspective: important to realize that financial crises have been a defining feature of the world economy these past 25 years 1/ nytimes.com/2020/12/17/us/…
The run arguably began with Mexico's tequila crisis in 1995; then there was the Asian crisis of 1997-8, the horrifying global crisis of 2008, the euro crisis of 2010-12, and a brief but very scary breakdown in March 2020 2/
I generally think of these crises in terms of the framework Shleifer and Vishny offered in 1997, explaining how it's possible for some assets to become massively underpriced; why don't buyers rush in? 3/
Read 7 tweets
18 Dec
The absence of state aid is a huge problem, because state and local governments, unlike the federal gov, are required to balance their budgets. But why? Important question 1/ nytimes.com/2020/12/17/bus…
In general, discussions on this point emphasize the impact of the rules but don't say much about their justification 2/ taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/….
My take is that the difference from the federal rules is ultimately driven by the difference in likely permanence of economic shocks. The nation as a whole can be expected to bounce back from a recession, which means that revenue will return 3/
Read 8 tweets
15 Dec
Some people have suffered terribly in the pandemic; others have done OK. This sets us up for a lot of misery in the first half of 2021, especially if there isn't a relief bill — but also for a strong recovery 1/ nytimes.com/2020/12/14/opi…
Over the next few months millions of Americans will be in desperate straits — savings exhausted, quite possibly evicted and homeless. But laid-off workers tend to be low-wage, which is why GDP has recovered much more than employment (Macro Advisers data) 2/
And the higher-wage workers who haven't been hurt much by the pandemic have been saving a lot, and are now flush with cash 3/
Read 4 tweets
11 Dec
The GOP spent most of 2020 rejecting science in the face of a deadly pandemic; now it's rejecting democracy in the face of a clear election loss. How did we get to this point? One step at a time, of course. But I'd argue that the wrong turn began under Reagan 1/
Republicans have, of course, done their best to beatify Reagan — mainly on the basis of an economic recovery that he didn't cause and the collapse of Communism, which he also didn't cause. What actually happened on his watch? 2/
Well, for one thing it was the beginning of the great mortality divergence. America used to have about the same life expectancy as other rich countries; since 1980, however, we've fallen far behind 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!