DIE HARD is the perfect Christmas Movie...for understanding how Americans view international politics

[THREAD] Image
To be clear: the movie doesn't capture ALL aspects of international politics (especially IR theory)

For that, you need to watch ID4!

But the movie expertly captures the anxieties associated with US "global leadership" during the late Cold War era.

Those are

-- relative economic decline

-- Vietnam syndrome

-- Terrorism

Let's look at each one (and what DIE HARD has to say about them)
- RELATIVE ECONOMIC DECLINE: The 1980s was the peak of Anti-Japanese economic anxiety in the United States.
Starting with the emergence of fuel-efficient Japanese automobiles in the 1970s (following the oil shocks), Japan was perceived as the emerging "economic super power". Image
Consider the best-seller "Japan as Number 1", published in 1979...

amazon.com/Japan-Number-O…
...or this @HarvardBiz published article published in 1981...

hbr.org/1981/01/behind…
...or, near the end of the decade, this @JamesFallows @TheAtlantic article

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Such anxieties fed a trade war between the United States and Japan Image
An excellent summary of "Japanophobia" in the 1980s, and the racism underpinning it, is offered by MJ Heale in this @jnlamstudies piece

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
In DIE HARD, "Nakatomi tower" owned by the Japanese Nakatomi Corporation -- the setting of the entire film -- symbolizes all of this. Image
Indeed, it is notable that the John McClane's (the hero) personal life is being undone by his inability to handle that his wife, Holly, took a job with this Japanese company.

VIETNAM SYNDROME: The film alludes to the folly of American militarism.
The phrase "Vietnam Syndrome" is in reference to the Us losing in Vietnam after a long, protracted conflict (US combat troops withdrew in 1973)

voanews.com/usa/day-histor…
The "syndrome" is an aversion in the American public to military intervention

brookings.edu/blog/up-front/…
Of course, this hadn't stopped the US from Using military forces. But the scale had been limited...

politico.com/story/2017/10/…
...or entailed heavy proxy support (as captured in "Charlie Wilson's War")...

...well, unless you don't count John Rambo (Note: Rambo III was released the same year as DIE HARD)

In Die Hard, American government/military hubris is captured by the FBI agents showing up...

...and they are keen to use force (even if it means "collateral damage")

The uber-bro of the two agents references "Saigon" when they are heading to the tower to take out the terrorists

But like the American experience with Saigon itself, it doesn't end well for them

- TERRORISM: The 1980s witnessed the heightened concern over international terrorism as a security threat.
See, for example, Pan Am flight 73 (in 1986)... Image
...and the PAN AM flight 103 bombing would take place in late 1988 Image
Incidents and fatalities of international terrorism had been rising since the early 1970s (at least according to the data on such incidents, which can be seen here: ourworldindata.org/terrorism)
The emergence of terrorism was challenging for American hegemony because, unlike the predictability of the Soviet Threat (i.e. missile balance or tank placements), terrorism could strike from anywhere without warning.
In DIE HARD, it's notable that the main "terrorist", Hans Gruber, comes from West Germany (associated with the Volksfrei movement), a US @NATO ally: perhaps capturing concerns about the complexities of US Cold War alliances. Image
And he drops references to other terrorist groups: New Provo front, Liberte de Quebec, and Asian Dawn

But it turns out that he's just a thief...an exceptional thief!

Making Gruber a thief rather than a terrorist is, in a sense, cathartic to Americans: his motivation is money, which seems more understandable, not ideological, which is scarier.
Though, as Jack Gibbs wrote in @ASR_Journal at the time, drawing a distinction between terrorism and robbery is obscure.

jstor.org/stable/2095609 Image
AND YET, despite exploring these anxieities, DIE HARD, through it's main character, captures the pop-culture ethos of "American exceptionalism": John Wayne, Rambo, Marshal Dillon, & Roy Rogers

Of course, DIE HARD almost parodied these ideas, but held back from going full parody. That would have to wait for @Trey_Parker_, @MatthewRicStone, & Pam Brady

So if you want to give your students (or yourself) a perspective on the anxieties associated with "global leadership", you can do worse than have them watch the "Quintessential American Action Movie"

[END]

theguardian.com/film/2018/jul/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

14 Dec
Is it true that democracies don't go to war with each other?

Sort of. But I wouldn't base public policy on the finding.

Why? Let's turn to the data.

[THREAD]
The idea of a "Democratic Peace" is a widely held view that's been around for a long time.

By 1988, there already existed enough studies on the topic for Jack Levy to famously label Democratic Peace "an empirical law"
The earliest empirical work on the topic was the 1964 report by Dean Babst published in the "Wisconsin Sociologist"
Read 42 tweets
12 Dec
What does the Texas lawsuit (& the Supreme Court's decision to reject that lawsuit) teach us about "Sovereignty"?

[THREAD]

cnn.com/2020/12/11/pol…
By way of background, the Texas Lawsuit asked the US Supreme Court to nullify the votes from Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Texas perceived those states as having carried out flawed elections.

texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/…
At the heart of the case was the idea of "sovereignty"
Read 25 tweets
9 Dec
Why are civil-mil scholars upset about Austin Lloyd's nomination as the 28th Secretary of Defense?

Consider the nomination of the 3rd Secretary of Defense: George Marshall

[THREAD]
In 1950, Truman wanted to fire the second SecDef, Louis Johnson, and install George Marshall as Secretary of Defense.
There was a problem: when the Department of Defense was created in 1947, section 202 of the 1947 National Security Act (which created the DoD, then called "The National Military Establishment") would not allow recently retired officers to serve as SecDef

global.oup.com/us/companion.w…
Read 18 tweets
6 Dec
What's the "value" offered by international relations scholarship?

What does it mean to think about world events "like an international relations scholar"?

Trump's order to withdrawal 🇺🇸 troops from 🇸🇴 offers a useful illustration.

[THREAD]

bbc.com/news/world-us-…
This event could be viewed from a variety of angles, from the "micro-level" on up.

International Relations scholars/analysts can and do use each of the following angles, though not all are strictly speaking taking an "International Relations angle".

Let's explore the angles.
The "country-expert" angle entails discussing the event by laying out the situation within Somalia, providing details on key figures involved and perhaps how the conflict has disrupted Somalia's internal governance and society.

africa.cgtn.com/2020/09/27/som…
Read 14 tweets
28 Nov
Beyond its impact on 🇮🇱-🇮🇷 & 🇺🇸-🇮🇷 relations, this assassination highlights hypocrisy by those touting the "liberal, rules-based international order".

But as I explain to my students, hypocrisy & contradiction are baked into the "liberal international order"

[THREAD]
To start, what is meant by "international order"? LOTs of definitions out there, but I use the definition from Ikenberry:

"The governing arrangements among a group of states, including its fundamental rules, principles, and institutions"
That definition is found in his famous book, "After Victory"

amazon.com/After-Victory-…
Read 18 tweets
11 Nov
I'm done using the term "Consolidated Democracy"

Here's why.

[THREAD]
To be clear, I have a vested interest in this term. It played a key role in research @jurpelai and I conducted on how International Organizations assist democracies. That research appeared in @World_Pol...

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!