Johnson: The new strain is particularly prevelant in London and areas of the South East
Hancock: Infections in students are driving transmission in London
Any bet failure to tackle transmission in schools turned them into petri fishes for the new strain #edutwitter
Government admitted students were as infectious as adults, they knew students were the most infected groups with figures continuing to rise, they knew half term cut RO, they were advised Nov lockdown wouldn't be as effective without tackling transmission in schools
They were warned about tackling transmission in schools time and time again.
By their own SAGE group, by @IndependentSage, the warnings came thick and fast,but who sets the agenda in this country? Westminster or RW rags and lobbyists posing as think tanks?
We have increasingly become an outlier on schools.
Even Sweden shut it schools while our Government was threatening to take people people to court for switching to remote learning for a few days
4 days ago the Children's Commissioner was telling us school opening had been a great success, and that transmission had been limited and wasn't something we needed to worry about
Then we have a slew of Celebrity Dr's who came out on TV, Radio and Press regurgitating the government narrative, not just disputing evidence but claiming there was none entirely
Then again TV stars and celebs were willing to take the government's shilling to tell the public there would be no issues with the return to school in September schoolsweek.co.uk/tv-star-and-ce…
When DfE set up a Fake News unit in the Summer some thought this was to tackle fake news, yet the DfE has consistently cranked out constant diet of propoganda schoolsweek.co.uk/dfe-to-tackle-…
This post is still up on Facebook...
In November I heard @NickFerrariLBC and @MaajidNawaz both claiming there was no evidence of a single education worker infected by a student. Maajid even said he wanted children infected so we build up herd immunity, no concern for staff or long covid
As we learn more about Long Covid impacting those who didn't get severely sick when infected, they have started looking at children @long_recovery are worth checking out
I hope findings of this small study isn't replicated more widely studyfinds.org/children-with-…
Start November SAGE publish a report on the infectiousness of children,this was spun by the press that "children less infectiousness than adults"
Actually it said primary may be a little bit less infectiousness and secondary students are as infectiousness
They knew this would happen, here is @DominicRaab on US TV explaining the sudden rise in infections in September was because of education returning and that this was fully expected
They claimed 'education staff were at no greater risk than other workers'
Turns out they were comparing us to frontline healthcare workers and we had the same risk, then it turned out the data was fudged and we are at more risk of infection
Also worth wondering why the government is still actively preventing masks being worn in classrooms, they are one of the only public spaces in UK where masks aren't allowed
SAGE have been recommending masks and social distancing in classrooms for 6 months!
Johnson did meet with pressure group UsForThem who believe in no safety measures in schools, they don't even agree with testing, how does a brand new lobby group get into number 10 when many established organisations have been completely ignored
Recently,besides misrepresentation of ONS data, elements of the media were still trying to deny education staff were in any risk at all
Had to organise a flood of official complaints against Daily Mail to regulator to get a correction printed
Why are we facing a Covid Christmas?
Cases were always going to rise in Winter,but
Lockdown without education didn't work
Transmission in schools was hidden rather than tackled
Test&Trace doesn't work
T&T is interlinked to schools, remember the aborted full return in June? SAGE had been saying schools shouldn't fully open without T&T, gov tried to ignore this but unions got public backing causing a more cautious approach to increasing wider opening, T&T start date set 1st June
No coincidence a gov that had binned T&T in Spring suddenly flung money at Dido Harding, SERCO and Deloit in May. It was so they could say T&T was up and running for schools in June, inaction, rushed PR move, poor end results, a fitting summary of government in 2020
Wonder if we would even have T&T if it wasn't for pressure on gov over schools in May, worked alright in late spring and summer, hoped it would improve more, crashed in Sept with little effort to fix it, was it job done when schools went back full time?
Other point of hope was the Containment Framework, specifically Annex 3, set out 4 tiers for schools based on local infection rates, ignored primary but seemed sensible for secondary with Tier 2 a move to blended learning, however didn't state what the thresholds were
Containment Framework tiers 2+ were never implemented, some schools went to blended because of staff shortages but CF wasn't invoked.
It was nothing but PR to create the false pretence that gov would act if transmission got out of control, they never did
The moment schools and local authorities starting begging for blended the DfE scrapped the Framework, as with masks in classrooms,announcing blended learning would be admitting transmission,the lies would come crashing down
In the same position as March, running out of staff, when questioned about staffing issues @NickGibbUK said "in the event of absences schools have adequate staffing"
DfE also refusing to answer FOIs on staff infection, hospitalisation and deaths and ONS stopped data collection
Trip down memory lane, remember when gov claimed to be following the science while refusing to publish any SAGE papers or even the members list, when they yielded to union led pressure it turned out they regularly ignored SAGE and selectively quoted them.
For newer readers of my long rants, you might be interested in this thread, I go through the early SAGE papers where they modelled the impact of 9 scenarios for schools on RO
They knew transmission would be high without blended if T&T wasn't effective
In April I explained how I saw government strategy developing and how MSM and then government would be influenced by lobbyists as debate in Covid was tribalised like climate change and Brexit by similar methods
Right now gov is panicking,they tried whack a mole, they tried balancing health vs economy ignoring the many people pointing out this is a false argument
They pinned to much on saying schools were a priority they made it a main measure of success,now trapped in their own rhetoric
Its why they scrapped the Framework the moment it might be needed, its why they threatened struggling schools and LAs with court for wanting a few days of remote learning. They were also thinking about January, they already knew about the new strain.
Is a chance the new strain only seems super infectious because its multiplying in schools where there are considerably better conditions for transmission than just about anywhere else. If new strain is infectious then rethinking schools is still essential or lockdown for months
Their panicked solution, mass testing with LFTs with a 50% failure rate as a replacement to isolation for close contact.
Its insane, they are willing to spend a fortune on unreliable testing to reduce isolations and not a penny on cutting transmission.
Gov knows
Schools driving infection,infection spreads from students to over 65+,a new extra contagious strain is in these areas
Gov decides
Scrap isolation for unreliable tests
Back to school without any extra measures, not even masks in classrooms
Rolling lockdowns till summer?
Gov knows this is dangerous, they know LFTs shouldn't replace isolation,do they really want to flip a coin for every asymptomatic case with the new strain to avoid isolation to mix in crowded schools?
Thats what they're proposing, almost sounds like a herd immunity strategy
End
1 final thing I forgot, after announcing mass testing they then offered to test the whole school population in January, from refusing to admit transmission to a move like this shows they are worried, they said PCRs to press but Q&A for heads said it would be more LFTs
Unuins have been accused of moaning, but we wanted German style PCR pool testing or the mobile PCR testing unit DfE promised would be regular and turned out to be exceedingly rare.
Another broken promise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reminder that it will take 9 staff 3 hours to test 100 people. Gov would prefer to take transmission risks with LFTs and have students spending more time waiting to be tested than learning just so they can boast they kept schools open in RW papers
Not education just dangerous PR
Government have told schools all comms to do with testing must be signed off by Department for Health, they're trying to block pictures of 100s of students milling about waiting to be tested for hours while mixing
As well as building a parallel teat and trace system for 500k-1m people a day we must also become DfE PR and propoganda merchants monitoring social media feeds and being "proactively positive" using government approved materials and messaging
Hey @BBCPolitics why did you cut out the most important part of the NEU press release?
Serious concerns have been raised within the scientific community and an article in the BMJ about the unreliability of LFTs, they should not be used as a replacement to isolation #edutwitter
So @BBCPolitics still gaslighting education workers valid concerns on safety.
Not a single mention of LFT concerns and their use on #r4today when @PaulWhiteman6 was interviewed either
2/ Worth beginning with the press release earlier today, dont worry not much work you just need to use January Inset day to retrain as public health officials.
Note that many support staff won't be in as schools cut their training to save money years ago
3/ Step 1 retrain and retitle staff.
100 tests a day will need 9 staff, 11-13 tests an hour per testing bay, so we either need to spend all day testing or have a lot of bays.
How many staff do they think we have in 10 years into a retention crisis deepened by covid?
2/ And LFT are particularly bad at picking up asymptomatic cases, the effectiveness of a policy like this is completely unproven.
3/ The policy is students don't isolate if they agree to daily testing
For seven days!
So gov has moved isolation from 14 to 10 days against WHO recommendations, a move @ReicherStephen said on @lbc wasn't based on reliable evidence, and now students only need 7 days of testing?!
Two big outbreaks in my area shuts two schools for the rest of the term.
School in London 65 out of 950 pupils turned up today. #edutwitter
Heard Havering are telling schools go remote if you want.
Three more schools in my area moving to remote learning for Friday. If this term was one week more the schools would probably all be shut from lack of staff anyway
Two more primary schools in area just sent out letters that they are going remote