Jill Biden and her doctorate have blown up online this past week. Writers have criticized her use of the honorific and (as @rkylesmith does) the quality of her dissertation.

I think it is a mistake to focus on her. 1/3

nationalreview.com/2020/12/jill-b…
Other have noted that her dissertation is far from atypical in her field, and my sense is this is not limited to education schools. Singling her out, given that her public profile comes mainly from her husband’s status, risks coming across as petty. 2/3
Rather, recognize that Biden’s degree is the norm for an elite increasingly obsessed with credentialism even as these credentials grow more disconnected from true learning.

The problem is a system where “Dr.” often means little, yet “Drs.” rule ever more of our lives. 3/3
IMO, the most effective response is to mock this credentialism through scrupulous compliance. Never call her anything but “Dr. Biden,” and do the same for all who make a show of their credentials—the more unimpressive the person or obviously mistaken his actions, the better.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nate Fischer

Nate Fischer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NateAFischer

21 Dec
Prediction: Demands will escalate that amateurs abstain from independent analysis and defer to credentialed experts.

The better the analysis, the more strident the denunciations will be.

The reason is that credentials are increasingly a filter for ideology, not competence. 1/7
Within many academic & professional domains, a key purpose of gatekeepers (credentialers, journals, etc) is to enforce ideological discipline—to ensure that an analysis is not just correct, but also advances dominant ideological priorities. 2/7
The real threat is not error (which can be refuted) but accurate analysis that transgresses ideological norms. This will rarely come from inside experts; they have already been filtered for conformity and would face professional repercussions.

The risk is from amateurs. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
20 Dec
Unsurprisingly, @DavidAFrench continues to harp on an alleged white evangelical/“Christian Nationalism” fusion (it’s become his signature crusade).

The study he cites lumps all non-white evangelicals together.

But his narrative breaks if we consider Hispanic evangelicals. 1/4
In a poll I helped sponsor in October, we found that by a substantial margin Hispanic evangelicals supported Trump—and aligned with white evangelicals on many other issues (a pattern confirmed in other polls). 2/4
Across every race, orthodox theological beliefs correlate with greater support for Trump and for traditionally conservative political views.

This suggests that theology, rather than French’s hypothesized racial/religious fusionism, is the real driver. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec
This is certainly a need, but I fear that many Classical Christian schools—while committed to truth and intellectual rigor—have not sufficiently steeled themselves against the intellectual and cultural forces driving wokeness. 1/4
Culturally, many share the mindset of politicians like Ben Sasse: oriented toward important truths, but failing to appreciate that these values are not just absent in the broader society, but under aggressive assault. The same is true of many Biblically oriented churches. 2/4
This mindset seems particularly prevalent in insular, high-social-capital Christian subcultures.

They diligently pursue truth, but do not explicitly contrast it with and challenge contemporary heresies—rendering themselves vulnerable to shrewd opponents pushing such errors. 3/4
Read 5 tweets
28 Nov
This is important and many misread the danger.

Marginalizing/censoring/deplatforming dissenters from the establishment narrative will not just make everyone fall in line.

But it will still cement that narrative’s power by atomizing any opposition.

Thread on dissent:

1/12
I doubt many mouthpieces actually think they can convince all Americans of the official narrative. On the contrary, they often barely hide their partisanship.

But fragmenting dissenters, and signaling the required position to anyone hoping not to be ostracized, is enough. 2/12
Thus even open censorship is effective.

Driving people to conspiracy theories may even strengthen an official ideological narrative by creating convenient straw men.

Any wonder the media obsessed over (and actively created social proof for) QAnon? 3/12
Read 11 tweets
3 Nov
Today is Election Day. My vote is for Donald Trump, and I believe yours should be too. 1/18
God has blessed us with an incredible inheritance—a country and culture that, despite past and present flaws, have helped create nearly unparalleled freedom and prosperity for generations of Americans. 2/18
America faces profound crises and divisions, and we have imperfect choices to govern us. Yet Trump is not just the lesser of two evils. He has been right in important ways that nearly all others have downplayed or ignored. 3/18
Read 18 tweets
3 Nov
Local investing leverages latent information and judgment.

So many financial "innovations" try to aggregate distributed savings—yet most investors have no edge picking such investments.

Their real edge is in making bets on people and ideas in their own networks and communities.
Robinhood/crowdfunding/etc push small investors into the same commoditized financial products as pros. Instead of leveraging an information edge, they're competing at a disadvantage.

Small investors should be taking advantage of their small size and non-Wall Street context.
If small investors can deploy capital based on real advantages—of information, judgment, or access—they may earn true excess returns. Without this edge, anything beyond passive allocation is simply speculation.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!