The President and his totally insane advisers are discussing seizing voting machines and declaring martial law cnn.com/2020/12/19/pol… nytimes.com/2020/12/19/us/…

Doesn't matter that it won't happen. These are grounds for removal from office. Full stop.
The President is having meetings in the White House about whether to mount a coup. We cannot be silent.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board mocked me for warning of the threat Donald Trump posed to American democracy back in 2017. People were still suggesting that the threat had been overblown just a few weeks ago. And here we are.
Donald Trump will not succeed. Joe Biden will be president on January 20. But the fact that a coup is being considered and the President is not being immediately impeached and removed from office is a sign of profound democratic erosion.
Dangerous how the goalposts are shifting. Imagine telling yourself in 2014 that people will think everything is fine because the next President won't *successfully* pull off a coup
Dangerous how we treat this as normal. In stable democracies, the military doesn't *have* to disavow its role in potential coup plots.
The man with the nuclear codes
The head of a state party is calling for the President to engage in a coup - a topic recently discussed at the White House - and overturn the results of a free and fair election.
Barely even news. The fact that a coup was *contemplated* is a violation of his oath. You impeach and remove any president who has meetings about overturning elections. Likelihood of success doesn't matter.
If the President had a meeting about murdering someone at the White House, would everyone say, well, he won't actually do it?

The President had a meeting where he and his advisers discussed a military coup as a response to the election. A coup. In the United States.
What if Barack Obama had a meeting about a coup? Does anyone think we'd just pretend it didn't happen?
Meanwhile, a "leading" contender for Virginia governor is calling for martial law (washingtonpost.com/local/virginia… thedailybeast.com/virginia-state…). What if she wins and tries to overturn the results in 2024? Should be expelled from the VA state senate nytimes.com/2020/12/20/us/…
Indeed. A bipartisan conspiracy of silence.
Nothing to worry about, just a delusional person at the White House trying to get the defeated president to seize voting machines from states as part of a coup-like effort to overturn the election. No big deal.
Nothing to worry about, just one of Trump's top advisers calling the incoming presidency "illegal" after Trump was defeated in a free and fair election

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brendan Nyhan

Brendan Nyhan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrendanNyhan

20 Dec
Seems pretty important to understand this before you tweet about why the CDC is wrong to 3.6M followers.
The issue of how to prioritize vaccines is genuinely complicated and one where science doesn't provide definitive answers - lots of ethical and logistical concerns as well.
the problems with the above are captured perfectly here
Read 5 tweets
11 Dec
64% is a staggering number. Consider: Who runs for office and who retires in the coming years? Who ascends into leadership or moves to higher office? Easy to imagine pro-democracy folks opting out and anti-democracy folks opting in to an extent that people are not grasping.
And how many of these are only mounting federalism objections? Not all 70 actually oppose contesting the election; some are just objecting to the means by which the suit attempts to do so
Only 25% of retirees are signing compared to 69% of those staying.

Put another way, 21% of the House Republicans who haven't signed on are retiring. Now compound that over a few cycles if this continues.
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec
Most Republican states are calling on a R-dominated Supreme Court to overturn the result of the election despite the outcome being obvious and the legal arguments being laughable. Imagine a Bush/Gore situation where legal issues are less clear and the margin is closer. What then?
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec
"the correlation of Twitter metrics—likes and retweets—and persuasion was -0.3, 'meaning that the better the ad did on Twitter, the less it persuaded battleground state voters.'"
super-interesting to contrast viral videos with what was found to be most persuasive super PAC ad
This. Also note that Lincoln Project folks note that some of their online stuff was directed at media conversation and Trump himself, not persuadable voters. (Cost-effectiveness question there seems substantial, though.)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!