The President is having meetings in the White House about whether to mount a coup. We cannot be silent.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board mocked me for warning of the threat Donald Trump posed to American democracy back in 2017. People were still suggesting that the threat had been overblown just a few weeks ago. And here we are.
Donald Trump will not succeed. Joe Biden will be president on January 20. But the fact that a coup is being considered and the President is not being immediately impeached and removed from office is a sign of profound democratic erosion.
Dangerous how the goalposts are shifting. Imagine telling yourself in 2014 that people will think everything is fine because the next President won't *successfully* pull off a coup
Dangerous how we treat this as normal. In stable democracies, the military doesn't *have* to disavow its role in potential coup plots.
The man with the nuclear codes
The head of a state party is calling for the President to engage in a coup - a topic recently discussed at the White House - and overturn the results of a free and fair election.
Barely even news. The fact that a coup was *contemplated* is a violation of his oath. You impeach and remove any president who has meetings about overturning elections. Likelihood of success doesn't matter.
Nothing to worry about, just a delusional person at the White House trying to get the defeated president to seize voting machines from states as part of a coup-like effort to overturn the election. No big deal.
Nothing to worry about, just one of Trump's top advisers calling the incoming presidency "illegal" after Trump was defeated in a free and fair election
The issue of how to prioritize vaccines is genuinely complicated and one where science doesn't provide definitive answers - lots of ethical and logistical concerns as well.
the problems with the above are captured perfectly here
64% is a staggering number. Consider: Who runs for office and who retires in the coming years? Who ascends into leadership or moves to higher office? Easy to imagine pro-democracy folks opting out and anti-democracy folks opting in to an extent that people are not grasping.
And how many of these are only mounting federalism objections? Not all 70 actually oppose contesting the election; some are just objecting to the means by which the suit attempts to do so
Most Republican states are calling on a R-dominated Supreme Court to overturn the result of the election despite the outcome being obvious and the legal arguments being laughable. Imagine a Bush/Gore situation where legal issues are less clear and the margin is closer. What then?
"the correlation of Twitter metrics—likes and retweets—and persuasion was -0.3, 'meaning that the better the ad did on Twitter, the less it persuaded battleground state voters.'"
super-interesting to contrast viral videos with what was found to be most persuasive super PAC ad
This. Also note that Lincoln Project folks note that some of their online stuff was directed at media conversation and Trump himself, not persuadable voters. (Cost-effectiveness question there seems substantial, though.)