1. Detailed monthly #ACA exchange enrollment figures...for the Open Enrollment Period.
Head-scratcher. We already get an annual report & CMS cut OEP down to 6.5 wks anyway. I'd LOVE it to be monthly (off-season data is scarce) but this makes it sound like it only refers to OEP.
2. Looks like the Surprise Bill prohibition also applies to pre-#ACA "grandfathered" plans...which is a good thing, though only a few hundred thousand people are still enrolled in those at this point.
3. $15 million per year in funding for outreach/education etc. for various state-based health insurance programs (?)
4. Extension of Spousal Impoverishment Protections
Let's say your spouse requires long-term nursing home care, which is insanely expensive, leaving you impoverished. In 1988 a law was passed protecting a chunk of your income. This extends that out to the end of 2023.
5. Community Health Centers & NHSC funding!
$4 billion/yr for CHCs thru 2023, and $310 million/year for the National Health Service Corps. (think Northern Exposure, or, less accurately, Doc Hollywood?)
6. BROKER/AGENT COMMISSION DISCLOSURE!
This requires insurance carriers to be extremely up-front in letting enrollees know how much if the premiums are going to brokers/agents for both #ACA plans *and* (more importantly) #ShortAssPlans.
📣 Tonight is Christmas Eve, so here's a thread about a so-called "Christian Health Sharing Ministry" which dives into Inception-level surreality. 1/
"Health Sharing Ministries" (usually offered by "Christian" organizations but occasionally via non-Christian groups) are promoted as an alternative to actual health insurance policies. They've become much more popular since the #ACA became law because they're less expensive. 2/
HOWEVER, there's some REASONS why they're less expensive than #ACA-compliant policies:
"Although HCSMs are not insurance & DO NOT GUARANTEE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS, their features closely mimic traditional insurance products, possibly confusing consumers." 3/
Trump just pardoned war criminals and has offered to pay the legal fees for his supporters who beat up protesters. What’s to stop him from openly telling his domestic terrorist base to follow through with their threats, have them charged in federal court and then pardoning them?
He’s still in office for 27 more days thanks to the GOP Senate, Barr just left leaving an even BIGGER Trump sycophant in charge of the DoJ for the next 4 weeks...while the public is distracted by Christmas, New Year’s & a mountain of COVID deaths.
Several have noted that his pardon won’t help with state charges...but some of THEM won’t know that. I suspect that’s why he’s floating pardoning Rittenhouse. He’s been told he can’t—but his base may hear about it and assume he can.
I decided to check into this. I found that only 1 Senator (Tammy Baldwin of WI) and 2 House members (Katie Porter of CA-45 and Johana Hayes of CT-05) *represent a swing state/district* AND openly/loudly state their support of "pure" M4All on their campaign websites.
But let’s suppose she was correct and but let’s suppose she was correct, and the President really did have the power to institute M4All immediately via XO. In one fell swoop, millions of legal contracts between carriers & providers, carriers & employers become null & void.
Doctors and hospitals, many of which are already on the verge of closing, suddenly see their revenue plummet by ~40% or so. Abortion suddenly has to be paid for 100% out of pocket by every woman in America who wants one.