Many are asking my view on the “surprise billing” fix that Congress passed last night. There are many details to review, but put it this way: The stock price of most of the big insurers dropped big-time yesterday. If their shareholders are upset, that's good news! (1/7)
As a former health insurance exec, I know my old colleagues & Wall Street worked hard to make sure this legislation boosted their bottom line. But it appears lawmakers changed it just enough at the last minute to dash the insurers’ hopes of windfall profits. Here’s how: (2/7)
If a previous version of this bill had passed, it would have let insurers slash payment to thousands of doctors in independent practice. This would have sent more physician practices into the arms of big hospital systems. How would this affect patients & consumers? Read on. (3/7)
When hospitals buy physician practices, they can charge more than docs charged when they were independent. And they often tack on a facility fee, which patients have to pay. So the fix that insurers favored would likely have led the cost of physician care to go up. (4/7)
Many physician practices have been gobbled up by big insurers & hospital chains. Sutter (the big hospital system in northern California that AG Xavier Becerra sued because of exorbitant prices) has bought so many physician practices, it now employs 12,000 doctors. (5/7)
And the biggest insurer, UnitedHealth, has been on such a "physician practice buying" binge, it now employs more than 50,000 docs. It’s become the biggest employer of physicians in the country -- which means many of the doctors in its networks work directly for the company! (6/7)
It’s past time that Congress ended “surprise billing." And it appears it did not pass the version backed by big insurers (which are now among the biggest, most profitable companies in the world).

If so, it's good news for the rest of us. (/END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wendell Potter

Wendell Potter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wendellpotter

15 Oct
Judge Barrett says she'd base rulings about health insurance on how "the founders" might have intended. This might make sense if health insurance companies actually existed then. As a former insurance exec, here's why her approach is laughable when it comes to healthcare: (1/10)
A huge part of the ACA is the rule that bars insurance companies from dumping Americans with "preexisting conditions." Well, in 1787, our founders were not thinking about this. Why? The term didn't exist yet, and neither did the insurance companies to refuse to cover them. (2/10)
My old company, Cigna, started in 1792, but wouldn't get into health insurance until the 1900s. Ben Franklin was one of the founders - but Ben knew little about health insurance. Why? In his day, the company insured ships & later got into the fire insurance business.  (3/10)
Read 10 tweets
2 Oct
Here’s an interesting irony: Everyone around Trump who gets #COVID19 may be in big trouble if they get their wish & gut Obamacare. Why? In the future, COVID will likely be classified by private insurers as a pre-existing condition. I'd know - I used to be an insurance exec. (1/8)
I sincerely hope & pray the President, First Lady & those around them who've contracted COVID get well. I hope & pray the same for all people, here & around the world. Now here's my concern about what they're doing to Obamacare & how it will affect those with COVID: (2/8)
I know firsthand that before the ACA, insurers kept a list of 400+ conditions they used to either reject applicants, or charge them more than they could afford to pay for coverage. If I were Hope Hicks, I might be concerned that my boss wants to go back to that system. (3/8)
Read 8 tweets
28 Sep
For the first @realDonaldTrump and @JoeBiden debate tomorrow, we asked 3,200 business leaders at @BusinessM4A what they wanted to hear from the 2 candidates. What they said will probably stun the political & media establishment (1/9)
Businesses are worried. They don't see a federal plan to defeat #COVID19. Many remain partially shut down from the pandemic. They've laid off or furloughed workers while still paying for health insurance. Many are broke-or almost there (2/9)
They're desperate for leadership, solutions & answers. They want to know about the PLANS to fight #COVID19, fix our broken health care system & restart an economy that is mired in high unemployment, low wages & workers without health care (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
24 Sep
Over the last few days, I’ve been asked many times: If a new Supreme Court overturns Obamacare, what would that mean for most Americans? As a former health insurance executive, here’s the scary truth: (1/12)
Some of my former colleagues are licking their chops. If the Supreme Court guts protections for pre-existing conditions, folks with asthma, diabetes or COVID-19 will be kicked off plans. That’s because they’re expensive to cover & insurers care about one thing: profit (2/12)
Millions of children will lose health coverage & seniors will lose Rx drug discounts. I’m particularly concerned about seniors because they're more likely to get sick. And those are the customers insurers want to avoid at all costs (literally). This reminds me of a story: (3/12)
Read 12 tweets
10 Sep
As a former health insurance exec who's seen terrible things, even I was stunned to see an aide to Sen Thom Tillis tell a woman that if a cancer patient doesn't have money or insurance for treatment, too bad. But there's an even bigger story here... (1/10)
The aide equated life-saving cancer care to buying a dress shirt: If you can't afford to buy them, why should you expect to get them? As I know first-hand, this is in line with how the insurance companies secretly think - and act. There's even a playbook. Let me explain: (2/10)
When I worked in the industry, we did all we could to avoid people with pre-existing conditions & "rescind" people's coverage when they got sick. Obamacare outlawed that, but insurers still do something called "lemon dropping" -getting rid of people who need expensive care (3/10)
Read 10 tweets
31 Aug
As a former health insurance exec, I know how rich corporations rake in billions by blocking life-saving procedures, hiking premiums & now exploiting a public health emergency. I often get asked what folks can do to help expose, shame & stop these swindlers. Here's what: (1/4)
A month ago today, I (and others) launched the Center for Health & Democracy to hold insurance companies accountable, including a real-time war-room to expose their lies. Thousands have supported our early work, and to defeat this monster, we need the help of the people. (2/4)
In the coming days, we want to launch a major program to help voters in swing states see how insurers are buying off their senators. To do it, we need to raise $2500 today. That means if enough folks give just $5 or $50, we'll do something radical. (3/4) secure.actblue.com/donate/af_chd_…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!