In "A Masterclass in Economic Calculation" @michael_saylor talks to @PrestonPysh about inflation and why he expects more companies to put bitcoin on their balance sheet.
This 6 tweet thread summarizes Michael's argument.
1/ CPI is losing relevance as a measure of inflation.
Businesses looking to understand how much purchasing power their cash will lose should track M2 money supply growth, which approximates the cost of capital.
While US CPI inflation rose only 0.2% in 2020, M2 soared by 24%.
2/ One reason for the disparity is that key items in the basket of goods that make up the CPI are subject to strong deflationary pressure.
This is especially true for intangible services such as software and digital entertainment where variable costs per unit are low.
3/ Instead of bidding up the CPI, new money is flowing into assets.
In 2020, the average price of a house in the Hamptons rose 15% in 16 weeks. The price of Apple stock doubled in five months. Bitcoin is up >400%.
We are seeing hyperinflation in scarce, desirable assets.
4/ Corporations are faced with an increasingly stark choice.
They can either hold their cash in fiat currency and watch its purchasing power melt away at the rate of M2 expansion (~10-15% p.a.) or they can hold their reserves in a secure digital asset with a fixed supply.
5/ Major companies like MicroStrategy, PayPal, MassMutual and Square acquired significant bitcoin holdings in 2020.
MicroStrategy purchased 70,470 BTC at an average price of $15,964. Bitcoin's price has since risen to $26,543.
Their example shows what is possible.
6/ Companies like Apple, Amazon and Tesla could generate significant shareholder value by converting their USD reserves into bitcoin.
This would not only protect them from inflation but would give an early-mover advantage by helping normalize bitcoin's use as a reserve asset.
Thank you for reading.
If you enjoyed this thread please retweet to help its message reach a wider audience.
Weimar Germany's hyperinflation provides perhaps the most dramatic example of the destruction that ensues when money dies.
This 16 tweet thread summarizes Adam Fergusson's definitive account, and explores the lessons we can learn from this dark period in German history.
1/ During WWI, European powers suspended the gold convertibility of their currencies, issued bonds and printed new bills, as a means of financing their war efforts.
With varying degrees of severity, each introduced price controls in a misguided attempt to suppress inflation.
2/ German price controls were the most stringently enforced in Europe.
At the same time, international isolation forced the government to rely heavily on inflationary domestic bond issuance for their financing.
Economic ruin served as a contributing factor to Germany's defeat.
In 1997, "The Sovereign Individual" made predictions about the ways in which the internet will radically alter society.
Many of those predictions, including the rise of "cybercash", are playing out before our eyes.
This illustrated thread summarises the book in 12 Tweets.👇
1/ Humans have passed through three societal epochs:
1. Hunter-Gatherer Society 2. Agricultural Society 3. Industrial Society
Now, looming over the horizon, is something entirely new, a fourth age characterised by the rise of the microprocessor: Information Society.
2/ During the industrial era, in order to realise economies of scale, populations clustered around large factories.
Production clustering made it easier for governments to increase taxes on those operating within their territory, allowing the state to grow in size and power.
The manufacture of collectables by pre-historic humans was the first step on the road to creating money.
@NickSzabo4's epic essay "Shelling Out" describes how and why this happened.
This illustrated thread summarises Nick's 12,000 words in 12 Tweets.👇
1/ Most hunter gatherers lived a precarious existence on the brink of starvation.
But we know from archaeological records that they made and collected jewellery.
The fact that early humans devoted their scarce resources to this seemingly frivolous activity merits exploration.
2/ Biologist J. M. Smith drew on game theory to describe the way humans evolve to propagate their genes.
Whilst individual humans might benefit from robbing the weak, cooperative tribes do better overall. Cooperation represents the "Nash Equilibrium" that leads to group survival
Have you ever heard it said that wealthy countries should prioritise reducing #inequality over growing the economy?
The 2009 book #TheSpiritLevel makes perhaps the most influential argument for that position.
But it is badly flawed.
This thread explains why. 👇
1/9
#TheSpiritLevel argues that income inequality leads to a range of bad social outcomes concerning life expectancy, obesity, mental health, homicide and child mortality.
They draw on data from 23 of the world's 50 richest countries to show convincing-looking correlations 👇
2/9
But what about the missing 27?
The authors say some lacked data. But excluded countries like Korea and Czechia seem to have it in abundance.
Countries with pop <3m were left out "to avoid tax havens". But countries like Slovenia clearly can't be categorised in this way.
Lockdown Sceptics has published an excellent long-read by @MichaelYeadon3 in which he argues that we are living through a "False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic".
His logic can be applied to other "high case, low excess death" countries like the US.