Cl 29 of the Future Relationship Bill is certainly interesting. If I’ve understood correctly, it is, in effect, an automatic Henry VIII clause that requires existing domestic law to be treated as subject to the Agreements to the extent that they have not been implemented. 
By automatic Henry VIII clause, I mean that cl 29 has the effect of requiring us to proceed as if domestic law had been amended via a Henry VIII power in circumstances where it has not been amended but where amendment is needed to implement the Agreements.
That does not strike me as ideal from a legal certainty perspective. But I guess it’s an acknowledgment that there may not be time to make all necessary changes to domestic law by more conventional means.
There is a sort of parallel with ECA 1972 s 2, which gave automatic effect to directly effective EU law and disapplied conflicting domestic law to the necessary extent, although the analogy is a far from perfect one.
There is also, of course, a parallel of sorts in the Withdrawal Agreement Act, which provides for the direct effect and supremacy of relevant parts of the Withdrawal Agreement.
Cl 19 of the Future Relationship Act is, in effect, conferring a form of automatic - or direct - effect on relevant provisions of the future relationship agreements, just as the ECA conferred@direct effect on EU law. Plus ca change...
(Previous tweet should have referred to cl 29, not cl 19.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
