SPACs raise cash and have 2 years to find a company to take public.
SPAC owners dilute shareholders via three ways:
- Warrants
- Shares
- Rights
This leads to SPACs historic high costs & poor post-merger performance.
Here's an illustration ...
2/ Further Embedded SPAC Dilution
The article mentions 3 other forms of dilution:
- SPAC sponsors pay themselves with "promote" of 25% of SPAC IPO proceeds
- Redeeming shareholders receive 11.6% annual return (incentive to redeem)
- SPACs pay u/w fee on IPO proceeds
3/ The Cost of SPAC Dilution
Due to the above dilution, SPACs don't actually have $10/share in cash.
The median SPAC’s dilution amounts to a staggering 50.4% of cash delivered in a merger
For each $10 share, there is $6.67 in cash and $3.33 in dilution overhanging the merger.
4/ Who Bears The Cost?
"A reasonable inference is that targets negotiated prices or share exchanges based on the cash value of SPAC shares, and that SPAC shareholders bore the cost of SPACs’ dilution."
In other words, SPAC shareholders get screwed and ear the cost of dilution.
5/ SPAC vs. IPO Cost
"If indeed SPACs are a cheaper way to go public than IPOs, it is only because SPAC shareholders are bearing the cost of SPACs and thereby subsidizing targets going public."
While most think SPAC IPOs are cheaper than traditional ways, it's not always true!
6/ How To Do SPACs Right
@BillAckman's Pershing is the poster-child of a great SPAC IPO.
"Pershing Square has sponsored a SPAC with a very different and less dilutive structure, and a few other SPACs have gone public with no warrants and hence less dilution."
Hope this sticks
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why it's bad: "The cost burden that branches place on traditional banks is increasing while their utility is decreasing."
What's better: "In contrast, digital wallets are acquiring millions of customers at a cost 98% lower than that for banks"
2/ Brick & Mortar Retail
Why it's bad: "If square feet were to stabilize at current levels, brick and mortar retail sales would continue
to fall as e-commerce takes share. Roughly
$1 trillion worth of real estate would have to be repurposed by 2025."