Nabī ﷺ said, ❝If you lose something or if you want a helper and you are in such a place where you don’t find anyone to help then one should say, ❛Help me, O Servants of Allāh! Help me, O Servants of Allāh!❜ As there are servants of Allāh
This is recorded by Ţabarānī in Mújam al-Kabīr from Útbah ibn Ghazwān, after which he states:
❝That has been acted upon.❞
[Vol. 17, pp. 117-118]
RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝If your mount flees in the desert, then call out, ❛Stop it, O servants of Allāh!❜ For Allāh has present those who will stop it.❞
This is recorded by Ibn al-Sunnī in Ámal al-Yawm wa’l Laylah from Ibn Masúūd.
[pp. 303-304]
RasūlAllāh ﷺ said, ❝When there befalls a difficulty upon you in travel, then he should call, ❛Help, servants of Allāh!❜❞
This is recorded by Bazzār in his Musnad and Ibn Abī Shaybah in his Muşannaf, from Ibn Ábbās.
[Vol. 10, pg 155]
Imām Abu’l Ĥasan Nūruddīn Álī al-Shāfiýī al-Haythamī [735-807 AH / 1335-1405 CE] records the same narration in Majmá al-Zawāyid wa Manbá al-Fawāyid and then writes:
❝It’s narrators are thiqāt [trustworthy].❞
[Vol 10, pp. 138-139]
These narrations all strengthen one another and so they are accepted, furthermore the fact that scholars acted upon them also demonstrates this.
Now, it may be asked, who exactly are these servants of Allāh whom we are told to seek help from?
Mullā Álī ibn Sulţān al-Qārī al-Ĥanafī [d. 1014 AH / 1605 CE] writes in Ĥirz al-Thamīn, regarding the meaning of ❝O servants of Allāh❞:
❝The intended is the Angels, or the Muslims from the Jinn, or Rijāl al-Ghayb, who are named the Abdāl.❞
Muĥammad ibn Álī al-Shawkānī [1173-1255 AH / 1759-1839 CE], whom the Wahābīs take from, writes in Tuĥfah al-Dhākirīn:
❝In the Ĥadīth there is evidence of the permissibility of Istiáānah [seeking help] with those whom a person does not see from among the servants of Allāh,
from the Angels and the righteous Jinn, and there is no harm in that, just as it is permissible for a person to seek help from Banī Ādam if his mount becomes unmanageable or runs loose.❞
[pg. 202]
Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] writes, as recorded in Fatāwā al-Riđawiyyah:
❝These three Ĥadīths destroy Wahābiyyat, that came from the narration of three Şaĥābah رضی الله تعالٰی عنہم. They have been accepted and acted
upon by the akābir úlamā’a e dīn رحمہم الله تعالٰی since the ancient past.❞
Let us now look to which of the akābir ulamā’a e dīn accepted this and acted upon it.
Ábdullāh ibn Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal states:
❝I heard my father saying: I performed Ĥajj five times, twice riding and
thrice on foot, or twice on foot and thrice riding. Once when I was on foot, I lost the way, so I began to say, ❛Show me the way, O servants of Allāh!❜ I kept repeating this until I was back on track.❞
[Masāyil Imām Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal, pg. 245]
Imam Yaĥyā Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī al-Shāfiýī [631-676 AH / 1233-1277 CE] writes in Adkhār, after quoting the second narration:
❝I say: One of our great Shaykhs in īlm narrated to me, he lost his riding beast, I think it was a mule, and he knew this Ĥadīth, so he said it,
thus Allāh brought it to him immediately.
I was once with a group, and my animal fled and they failed to find it, so I said it, thus I found it immediately without any means besides this statement.❞
[pg. 192]
Thus we see that these narrations are accepted and acted upon.
As for those who claim it is shirk to ask help from angels, jinn and in general from anyone other than Allāh, then we ask them a few questions.
1. Is the instruction of RasūlAllāh ﷺ, an instruction of shirk?
2. Did those who acted upon it, such as Imām Aĥmad, commit shirk?
3. Is seeking help from angels and jinn shirk?
4. If you consider it shirk, then do you claim to understand tawĥīd and sūrah al-fātiĥah better than RasūlAllāh ﷺ, the salaf and the khalaf?
5. If we act upon this narration are we mushrikīn?
6. Does this call come under worship?
7. You claim there is no point in asking other than Allāh for help and to do so is shirk, what do you have to say to this?
For any Wahābī who wishes to point out that two of the narrations contain weakness in their sanads, then there is no benefit or point in doing so, as the other narration is sound and the different routes through which this is narrated all strengthen each other.
Not to forget that it is accepted and acted upon by scholars throughout the ages, and so the individual weaknesses of some of these chains has no affect on the acceptability of these narrations.
In addition, it is permitted to act upon weak narrations in such matters.
❛Whoever left towards Suddah (Álī al-Qārī said that it means a gathering of
the people of Kufr) has committed Kufr, as in it there is an announcement of Kufr, and it is as if he has helped in it (i.e. Kufr). Upon the qiyās of Suddah, going out on Nayrūz and doing as they do on that day is Kufr.❞
This is also mentioned in Minaĥ al-Rawđ al-Az’har.
Mujaddid Alf Thānī Imām Rabbānī Aĥmad al-Fārūqī al-Sirhindī al-Naqshbandī al-Ĥanafī [971-1034 AH / 1564-1634 CE] writes in one of his Maktūbāt:
❝And honouring the respected days of the Hindus and in those days enacting the known rituals of Hindus also accentuates Shirk
The term Punjab is a compound of the Farsi words, “panj” (پنج), meaning five and “āb” (آب), meaning water. The Farsi term is thus a calque of the Sanskrit word Pañcanada.
We observe this word being used in Book 2, Sabha Parva, Chapter 29:
This passage mentions the lands conquered by Nakula, the fourth of the five Pandava brothers. Of those lands, one is Pañcanada.
Once more, we see reference to Pañcanada, in Book 5, Udyoga Parva, Chapter 19, in the description of the multitude of the army of Kauravas:
From this it would seem that according to Imām Shāfiýī and Imām Nawawī, any and all buildings over graves must be demolished and it is impermissible to construct over them.
Rather, the Shāfiýī position is that it is Makrūh if done in land one owns, and it is Ĥarām if done in land that one does not own.
Imām Nawawī himself states this, before quoting Imām Shāfiýī. He writes:
❝As for building over it, then if it is in the ownership
of the one who builds, then it is Makrūh, and if it is in a waqfī graveyard then it is Ĥarām.❞
This is according to the agreement of all four Mad’habs; that it is impermissible to build over graves in the waqfī graveyards as this prevents others from their right of burial.
around the mazārāt [graves] of the respected Úlamā’a and Mashāyikh قدست اسرارهم (may Allāh sanctify their secrets) on land with permissible disposal, with the purpose that visitors and beneficiaries may find rest [in them]. They made clear that the reason behind the prohibition
is [when there is] an evil intention or absence of benefit, thus where there is a praiseworthy intention and benefit is present, then the prohibition falls away. Analysis of circumstances and noble research in this matter is that if the building is built first and then burial
Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] received a query from Madrasah e Ahl e Sunnat, Bāzār Dīwān, Murādābād, sent by Maulavi Abu’l Masúūd Ábdu’l Wadūd Sahib, Ţālib e Ílm [student of knowledge], on 1st Jamād al-Ūlā
1336 AH:
Which sect is Wahābī, which are common, and where is their origin from, and what are their beliefs, and what has come in the Ĥadīth in their matter?
The answer:
Wahābī is a faithless sect, which burns at the honouring of those beloved to Allāh and wishes to erase
their remembrance and honouring by various sorts of stratagems. Its origin is from Iblīs Laýīn [accursed], that Allāh ázza wa jall gave the command to honour Sayyidunā Ādam عليہ الصلاة والسلام and that Malúūn did not accept. And in the time of Islām Dhu’l Khuwayşarah Tamīmī
IS IT VALID TO BELIEVE ALLĀH IS LOCATED ON THE ÁRSH?
Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] was sent by Ţālib Álī Sahib on 15th Jamād al-Ūlā 1336 AH:
To consider the Dhāt of Bārī [the Creator] táālā to be only on the Ársh and not to
consider any creation of Allāh, other than above the Ársh, to be encompassing the Dhāt of Bārī táālā, but rather to say that only the Divine knowledge encompasses all things and his Dhāt is solely on the Ársh, and not in another place. Is this belief that of Ahl e Sunnat or
not? And the one who believes this, is it permissible or not to pray behind him? And also explain this, that people attribute this belief to the Ĥanābilah, is this truly the belief of the Ĥanābilah or not? To consider the Dhāt of Allāh to be on the Ársh, without expressing the