Many people see similarities between faith in bitcoin and faith in religion.
Many simplistic moderns see the faith in bitcoin as silly. These people are silly and don't know the history of currency and its relationship to currency.
Religion and Money have always been tied.
Bitcoin is a new way of writing out "who paid who what?"
Most people don't know that the writing started first as trying to understand God. God is a placeholder for humans for everything bigger than us that we don't really understand but fills me with joy
Who paid who what? Who owes whom? Who needs to pay the government still?
But accounting and God, what do they have to do with each other?
The divine rights of kings! Leaders had to become tiny gods in order to rule.
And the government needed to get paid.
But then we came up with secularism and things got really confused. Fast forward to 2008 and then it got ever more confusing. God is dead and government is incompetent when it comes to sound money.
A movement is born! A bitcoin is born!
At its core, Bitcoin is an innovation in the accounting of credits and debits (who paid who what?).
When I send Bitcoin to your address, the exact amount of bitcoin that I send is debited from my address and credited to your address.
This is immutably secured (unchangeable) in history on the record of the blockchain. Miners compete with each other to solve cryptographic puzzles in order to record this on the blockchain. The winner gets paid in Bitcoin.
It is a system for accounting! Now the faith part.
It does seem like this is the first step in the transfer of godly power from governments to machines (something that will have externalities we can't see yet).
People don't have faith in Bitcoin, they have faith in the architecture of Bitcoin.
The architecture of Bitcoin is supposedly guaranteed to be human proof (but its not totally) and relies on computing power and competition among groups of humans (miners) to secure the system from attack by bad actors. So far it has survived every attack.
Yet it is theoretically possible to update the code of Bitcoin and create a hard fork. This has been tried with several versions, all of whom failed to get proper mind share from Bitcoin miners. This doesn't mean that it won't happen in the future, but it does mean its difficult.
Someone could theoretically convince more than 51% of miners to switch to their new network which messes with the original code to change the total amount of Bitcoin that is possible to mine, thus changing the supply and demand of Bitcoin. But here is where the faith comes in.
The values of the core group of people who created and made Bitcoin flourish would not let this happen (although who knows what will happen in the future now that institutional money is coming in).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember to actually get up and practice along with these if you are in a spot where you can get down.
Here is the first lesson:
Bouncing up and down, then switching feet to experiment with weight shifts.
All dancing happens from the feet up although neurological phenomena travel down to the feet and color your movement and experience. These are called descending tracts in spine
In the same way that people find a drug of choice like Heroin or Religion or Sports, we each also have a different plant medicine that draws us into its machinations. For me that is Iboga, not ayahuasca. More on Iboga here:
That being said, I'm fascinated by ayahuasca and its rapid ascension to most known of the very intense transformative psychedelics and I want to try to piece together the pharmacology and signficance of it even though the US federal government makes that incredibly hard.
I don't think people who weren't there can understand how fascinating and beautiful it was to live in San Francisco in the years 2008-2015.
Tech optimism was universal, yet SF also had the full flowering of transformational psychology. The wierdos had finally won.
There wasn't yet the hint that this tech thing might sweep across the world and cause the kind of transformation that would come with unintended consequences, some of which would rattle the very core of who we think we are. Looking back now, it seems a bit naive.
If you had the right university degree, you could come in and participate in this gold rush where everyone was changing the world with the assumption that that change would bring only the Good. 20 years old were becoming millionaires and it seemed like anyone could do it.
The best analogy I have for helping to visualize this devilishly difficult piece of anatomy to visualize is to see it as the forest through which the cells of your body wander and attach to. This stuff is really bizarre.
Before moving on, if you want to understand the overarching category to which the ECM belongs, check out this thread on connective tissue, with links to other types of connective tissue:
About 4 years ago, I found myself at the lowest point of my life. A chronic health issue had left me bedridden and I finally gave up, knowing that I could not handle it by myself any longer. I started looking for people who could guide me out of the abyss.
I had been meditating for at least 10 years at this point. I was an autodidact, self-taught. I had done maybe 5 or 6 ten-day meditation retreats. I had significant experience with meditation yet still I was stuck in a way that I could not see an exit.
So I thought I would find someone who was more experienced than me to show me a way out. I found someone on Quora who kept on answering my questions with seemingly solid historical answers about traditional forms of meditation.
It seems that just like the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of World War II before it, we have now transitioned into something new, a new state of the global political order.
What shall we call it? Will China be the king domino or are we in store for something novel?
I think often times we are blinded by history and many today see the rise of China in the same way that the US rose during World War II.
Yet China has intense demographics that make elderly Europe look like a youthful child. Russia certainly isn't going to be the savior.
I wonder if we are currently entering a stage where we entirely reject the western philosophical tradition yet fail to replace it with anything else that unifies the world.
I'm unhappy about the loss of the western philosophical tradition so I could be pessimistic on this.