Share this page!

Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
Twitter logo
4 Jan, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Contrary to breathless climate reporting, number of major landfalling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — has not increased since 1900

(Notice unprecedented major hurricane drought from 2006-16)

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
Scared witless has real impacts

Half the world now believe climate change will make humanity go extinct

Reality? UN expects average person in 2100 to be 450% richer. Climate will make that 434%. Problem, not end-of-world

My new book (free first 25p): ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o Image
Similarly: Despite breathless climate reporting, the number of landfalling US hurricanes does not show an increase since 1900

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
Actually, the best climate science expects we will see *fewer* not more hurricanes (but stronger, so climate will still be a problem)

Yet, for now, we can't see a change in either all or major landfalling hurricanes

See refs and more literature here

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Bjorn Lomborg

Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BjornLomborg

Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
3 Jan
Contrary to breathless media reporting, land-falling US hurricanes — the most reliable hurricane indicator — does not show an increasing number of hurricanes since 1900

Update of my free, peer-reviewed sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Scared witless has real impacts

Half the world now believe climate change will make humanity go extinct

Reality? UN expects average person in 2100 to be 450% richer. Climate will make that 434%. Problem, not end-of-world

My new book (free first 25p): ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o
Yes, 2020 Atlantic hurricane season very powerful

But Accumulated Cyclone Energy (the integrated metric of frequency, intensity+duration):

2020 only 14th-strongest

1933 — almost a century ago — still strongest, followed by 2005, 2017, 1893 and 1926

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/d…
Read 6 tweets
Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
21 Nov 20
Why do we donate so much time+money inefficiently?

We care about effectiveness when giving to ourselves or our family

When giving to strangers, we care about what *others* think about us (they don't evaluate us on effectiveness)

nature.com/articles/s4156…
If our giving is multiplied 10x by, say, Gates, we should give more (because your dollar will mean $10 to the good cause)

But we don't give more to charity

If Gates multiplied a giving to ourselves, we *do* give more

nature.com/articles/s4156…
Getting us to give effectively is just very, very hard.

We mostly give in ways that are "reputationally lucrative" — ways that make us look good among our peers

nature.com/articles/s4156…
Read 4 tweets
Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
18 Nov 20
Great we're again discussing the real and manmade problem of climate

But let's get the facts straight

Hurricanes are not increasing in frequency

The best way to help Central America is not climate policy but helping them out of poverty

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/9…
Best long-term data is US landfalling hurricanes, because reliably recorded since 1900

Frequency of all hurricanes *not* increasing

Frequency of strongest hurricanes (Cat3+) *not* increasing

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/9…
Just using data across entire Atlantic has two problems:

1) Earlier years, especially after opening of Panama Canal, many storms missed

Here observations of the two strongest hurricane years 1933 and 2005

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.102…
Read 15 tweets
Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
18 Nov 20
Great we're again discussing the real and manmade problem of climate

But let's get the facts straight

Hurricanes are not increasing in frequency

The best way to help Central America is not climate policy but lifting them out of poverty

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/9…
Best long-term data is US landfalling hurricanes, because reliably recorded since 1900

Frequency of all hurricanes *not* increasing

Frequency of strongest hurricanes (Cat3+) *not* increasing

journals.ametsoc.org/bams/article/9…
Just using storm frequency across entire Atlantic has two problems:

1) Earlier years, especially after opening of Panama Canal, many storms missed

Here observations of the two strongest hurricane years 1933 and 2005

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.102…
Read 15 tweets
Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
14 Oct 20
New UN report claims climate-related disasters have doubled

The report is incompetent and wrong on pretty much all accounts

The report should be withdrawn

Thread

Report here: undrr.org/news/drrday-re…
Data here: public.emdat.be
New UN report claims climate-related disasters doubled

Yet, even the report's own data shows the number of climate-related dead has *halved*

Report here: undrr.org/news/drrday-re…
Data here: public.emdat.be
Death data is relatively robust

Instead, almost all non-death data is much better reported towards the present. That is the main reason the UN finds an increase in numbers.

Yet, they simply wave it away

Report here: undrr.org/news/drrday-re…
Read 20 tweets
Bjorn Lomborg Profile picture
17 Sep 20
Only people born *after* 2050 will experience net benefits from climate policy

Costs come soon, benefits much later

Optimal policy still worth having, but shows why climate policy so difficult:

Convincing people to pay, *none of whom will net benefit*

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
Climate policy leads to net-costs until 2080

New paper shows how climate policy costs come soon, whereas benefits mostly accrue much later

In total, the optimal policy is still worth having, but it shows why doing climate policy is so difficult

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
Climate policy only becomes net-benefit after 2080, irrespective of climate costs or climate policy costs doubling or halving (if climate is worse than expected, we'll do more climate policy, hence pay more, hence break-even still in 2080)

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @BjornLomborg has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @BjornLomborg!

Read all threads by @BjornLomborg