In 2021 #suicideprevention will remain vital to the #Covid response, so this is a good time to sum up what we know re the impact on suicide. Simple answer is that several countries have now reported no rise. But the picture is more complex, as always with suicide stats. /thread
First, it’s important to stress that graphs & data represent real lives tragically lost. No suicide rate, whether high or low, rising or falling, is acceptable. Even before Covid there were over 6000 deaths by suicide per year in the UK.
From the start of the pandemic there was concern that suicide rates would rise. In April we set out a prevention plan covering groups at risk, #mentalhealth care & economic protections (lead author David Gunnell @SASHBristol):
It took several months but a number of countries have published national or state-level suicide data. Most have found no effect. These reports come from Norway, Sweden, Australia, NZ, US & Canada. We summarised the evidence here, lead author @ProfAnnJohn:
In England we have had to set up new data collection - “real time” surveillance (RTS) - as inquests can take months. Here also we have seen no change pre- to post-lockdown, at least in those areas with good quality RTS, total population 9m. Now being expanded & updated.
Our conclusions however were cautious. These are early figures & may change. Within the overall finding, there could be different effects between population sub-groups or geographical areas - after all, the impact of Covid itself has not been uniform across communities.
One country has reported a different pattern - Japan, where a fall initially occurred, followed by a rise, esp in females. Possible causes include the economic role of women & celebrity suicide. But is Japan an outlier or a warning to the rest of us?
Then there is Maryland (US) where the effect has varied by ethnicity, with a rising rate in the black population & a falling rate in whites. Could this reflect the experience, the trauma, of the pandemic combined with underlying economic disadvantage? jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
We also have to square the findings on suicide with the distress found in surveys & calls to charities. Both can be true. Alongside extra stress there may be added support from family, neighbours & services. A sense of getting through this together may have been protective.
What of self-harm, which should mirror suicide more closely? Community SH rates too have been stable while hosp attendance with SH fell in lockdown, though reluctance to go to A&E probably played a part. Summarised here, lead author Nav Kapur @NCISH_UK: thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/…
Yet the dominant narrative in the media & social media has been of suicide escalating. Countless claims & headlines have appeared, based on limited data at best. Misleading & potentially harmful, as explained here, lead author Keith Hawton @OxPsychiatry:
Where does that leave the evidence so far? Suicide rates have not risen in the way many feared but we are still in mid-pandemic. Now the question is changing, becoming more nuanced - not whether there will be an effect overall but who is most vulnerable, where & when?
There are risks as we enter 2021. The social coherence of last April seems to have eroded. There is a weariness about a further cycle of restrictions. There are fears for the future of young people & the economy.
The task for us all in the coming months is to ensure a focus on #mentalhealth, on anyone lonely or mentally ill, in crisis or financial hardship. We need to rediscover the values that unite us & the benefits of mutual support. And remind ourselves there is an end in sight.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Suicide in several countries, inc England, didn’t rise after lockdown - see @bmj_latest this wk. Yet many studies have shown poorer mental health. How do we square these findings? Answer matters to #SuicidePrevention in next phase of the pandemic. /Thread
I should stress it’s not unusual for rates of mental ill-health & suicide to diverge. Most surveys of anxiety or depression find higher rates in women but suicide is 3x more common in men.
It’s not hard to see why the 1st, stricter lockdown impacted on mental health: fear of catching virus, isolation, loss of usual supports, disruption to services, domestic violence, alcohol, trauma & bereavement. An @ONS study found loneliness to be main driver of anxiety.
Today we have released suicide data for 2020 covering several parts of England, total population 9 million. The month by month figures are reassuring: they show no rise in suicide following lockdown.
As always when we present graphs & data, we want to stress that these numbers represent real people, real lives lost, real families devastated. We work a lot with bereaved families & never forget the individual tragedies that lie behind our statistics. @NCISH_UK
Our report combines “real time” suicide numbers for several areas of England for 2020 to give a national picture. Monthly figs vary, with no pattern & no change at lockdown: average pre-lockdown 84.0, post-lockdown 85.4.
There are frequent claims in the press & on social media about rising suicide rates. Which means a regular need to clarify: we don’t yet know the impact of Covid-19 & lockdown on the national suicide rate.
Why is this difficult? And what can we say so far?
/thread
Important to stress that if suicide rate goes up - or if it doesn’t - it’s in public interest for press to raise it & for public to know. But there’s also risk of causing distress to vulnerable people & a need to report responsibly.
And then there is the issue of evidence. /2
Not hard to see where risk may come from: anxiety, isolation, disruption to care, domestic violence. But support from family, services & community can help.
Even mental health impact of an economic downturn can be mitigated if we support people losing jobs or on benefits. /3
No shortage of social media comment about suicide over the weekend but few researchers joined in & those who did called for caution from everyone else.
And with good reason. Research evidence warns that media coverage can put others at risk. jech.bmj.com/content/57/4/2…
Thread/1
Main concern is imitative suicide, when one death leads to another in similar circumstances. Imitative suicide happens when the second person identifies with the first. It is more likely in young people and after the deaths of celebrities. /2
This isn’t to say that just by hearing of a suicide we can become suicidal ourselves. It means that a distressed person may feel a connection with someone who has taken their own life & that perceived bond can even extend to how they died. /3
What to conclude from today’s suicide figs? Tragic that rates rose in UK in 2018, really from late 2017, reversing fall of prev 4yrs. Although highest rates are in people in their 40s/50s, main rise is in young people.
In fact, rise in suicide in young people is not new. Teenage suicide rates have been rising since around 2010, continuing despite falling rates in other age groups. Non-fatal self-harm in young people has also been rising.
Part of today’s rise can be attributed to a lowering of the standard of proof for suicide required at inquest. But the rise began before that, so other factors are having an effect. We don’t know for certain what those factors are but...