Yes, I do. You dont it seems. "Sufis" are part of the Ahl-ul-sunnah which is an umbrella term for all those ascribing to the Aqaid of Ahl-ul-Sunnah, which literally means "people of the Sunnah" & it includes ahmadis. You dismiss scholars that dont fit your view as I've said 1/
https://twitter.com/fatheroftheagle/status/1347931758864510976
earlier because your dishonest. Many scholars agreed with the Ahmadi Aqida, some didnt. Which shows that we have to refer to back to the Quran & Muhammad (sa) to establish the truth which youre scared to do because you have no argument from them. 2/
Mulla Ali Qari (rh) agreed with the ahmadi aqida. He said that Khatam-un-Nabiyyin means that: there will not come a prophet after Muhammad (sa) who could cancel his law and who is not a follower of his (Mauzooat Kabeer, p. 69). 3/
He also said regarding "La Nabiya Ba'di":
“According to the ‘Ulamā (religious scholars), the words ‘Lā Nabiyya Ba‘dī’(There is no Prophet after me) means that no prophet in the future shall be raised
who shall abrogate his law.” (Al-Ishā’ah Fi Ashrātis-Sā‘ah, p. 226) 4/
“According to the ‘Ulamā (religious scholars), the words ‘Lā Nabiyya Ba‘dī’(There is no Prophet after me) means that no prophet in the future shall be raised
who shall abrogate his law.” (Al-Ishā’ah Fi Ashrātis-Sā‘ah, p. 226) 4/
He also said. “All 72 sects will be in the fire and the one sect which will be saved from the fire, will be that which will follow the pure Sunnah of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sa) and their pure dispensation will be called Al-Ahmadiyya.” (Mirqāt al-Masabih, Vol. 1, p. 204) 6/
Now these statements show us 3 things.
1) Mulla Ali Qari was conflicted & mistaken
2) He was dishonest
3) His statements should be looked in their entirety with the aid of the Quran & Hadith to understand their true meaning. 7/
1) Mulla Ali Qari was conflicted & mistaken
2) He was dishonest
3) His statements should be looked in their entirety with the aid of the Quran & Hadith to understand their true meaning. 7/
Since, we can agree he was pious individual. point 2 is removed. Since the Quran agree with his point on Khatm-e-Nabuwat, like in those point 1 is one removed. Which leads us to point 3. his statements should be looked in their entirety. The statement of Fiqh Akbar is true 8/
with regards to law-bearing prophethood that abrogates the law of Muhammad (sa) & claims prophethood independent of Quran & Muhammad (sa) which is the exactly the same position, we ahmadis hold. Hence, its crystal clear that not only did Mulla Ali Qari (rh) believe 9/
in Khatm-e-Nabuwat & La Nabiya ba'di in the same that ahmadi muslims do, but he also mentioned the name of the one Jamaat which would be on haq & that is Al-Ahmadiyya. 10/10
**Sorry for the grammatical errors for the readers.**
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
