حيدر‎ Profile picture
12 Jan, 11 tweets, 3 min read
Have you ever wondered why all these so-called muslim handles hide behind aliases & anonymous profiles? Their cunning nature runs so deep they themselves know theyre liars.

Allegation is against the revelation of Ahmad (as) where he states "Yalash is the name of God Himself” 1/
Ahmad (as) has himself explained its meaning & stated: 2/
Its not true that Allah can only be called by 99 names. One can call Allah by many of his names. It is true that according to the Quran Allah has 99 attributes, however He is not limited to those names alone. Because the Quran has 99 attributes of Allah 3/
it doesnt mean there are 99 names for God. It only shows that Allah has 99 attributes which are present in the Quran. During the death of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (saa) he called Allah, Rafiq. Al-Rafiq is not one of the 99 names from the Quran. 4/
According to those who raise this allegation against Ahmad (as), it would mean that the Prophet Muhammad (sa) believed in two gods? God forbid! We know he didnt, as Ahmad (as) never did either. 5/
Here are some Ahadith which mention this: 6/
Its narrated many more times throughout the books of Ahadith. Furthermore, Allah States in the Quran call him by whichever name which shows that all beautiful names belong to Allah & He is not restricted to only 99 attributes as the Ahadith of the Prophet (sa) also support 7/
Another beautiful prayer of Muhammad (sa) further proves our view to be the real view of Allah and His Prophet (sa). He (sa) was taught a prayer for distress which is as follows: 8/
Muhammad (sa) makes it clear that there are names that are revealed in the Book & others which exist as well that are revealed to the servants of Allah & some which are kept in the knowledge of the unseen. 9/
The scholars of the non-Ahmadi Muslims themselves quote this hadith, but sadly the hypocrites among them make allegations against the Promised Messiah & Imam Mahdi, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as).

May Allah safeguard us from deceitfulness & hypocrisy. 10/10
Another lie was that our Shahada is different. Our Kalima is the same as Prophet Muhammad (sa). It might be that these liars have another Kalima. 11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with حيدر‎

حيدر‎ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Qalam001

13 Jan
Youre incorrect. Allah Makes it clear that a human passes away either by dying naturally or being killed as Allah States:

أَفَإِنْ مَاتَ أَوْ قُتِلَ
If then he die or be slain

when Khala is used in the past tense for human beings, it is always used for passing away, i.e. Death. Image
We see this in countless examples of the Quran. ImageImageImage
First Ijma of Sahaba Proves Khala Means Death ImageImageImage
Read 19 tweets
13 Jan
If you read your own tafsir it mentions it means sleep if layl (night) or manam (sleep) is mentioned which it is in 6:60 but not in the verses pertaining to the death of Isa (as). 1/ Image
Whenever tawaffa appears in the form of Bab Tafa-ul and the subject is Allah or the angels, and the object on which this verb is applied has a soul, (no night or sleep being mentioned) always infers the meaning of death as it does with the verses regarding Isa (as) 2/
Tawaffa has been used 25 times in the Quran. Here are the ayahs it has been used in. (Our Quran differ with 1 number in numbering due to Bismillah being the first verse in every Surah [except Surah Tawbah]) 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
You just acknowledged Isa (as) will be the last prophet on earth before Qiyama . Brother, cant you see the truth is coming from your own hands but youre still in denial? Older prophets cant return to future Ummahs according to Islam. Its against the Sunnah of Allah. 1/
We see this in the hadith regarding Musa (as). When He (as) pleaded to Allah to be a prophet for a future Ummah it was rejected. Prophets of any Ummah are from themselves. 2/
In the Quran, Allah states that a prophet may be part of the Ummah before him. 3/
Read 9 tweets
11 Jan
Yes, I do. You dont it seems. "Sufis" are part of the Ahl-ul-sunnah which is an umbrella term for all those ascribing to the Aqaid of Ahl-ul-Sunnah, which literally means "people of the Sunnah" & it includes ahmadis. You dismiss scholars that dont fit your view as I've said 1/
earlier because your dishonest. Many scholars agreed with the Ahmadi Aqida, some didnt. Which shows that we have to refer to back to the Quran & Muhammad (sa) to establish the truth which youre scared to do because you have no argument from them. 2/
Mulla Ali Qari (rh) agreed with the ahmadi aqida. He said that Khatam-un-Nabiyyin means that: there will not come a prophet after Muhammad (sa) who could cancel his law and who is not a follower of his (Mauzooat Kabeer, p. 69). 3/
Read 10 tweets
14 Aug 20
Followers of @hwmaqbul cant answer my simple question & turn to red herring fallacy. @Mahz4130 have read 0 books of Ahmad (as) & refers to some random site instead of investigating whether Ahmad (as) claimed to be the Hindu god, Krishna.

Dishonesty of these people is appalling
the Hindus call Krishna an avatar. In Hinduism, the concept of a prophet is in reality referred to as an avatar. The word autar in their language comes from “utara” and means the same as a messenger in English. Ahmad (as) explained that Krishna was a prophet who had his message
distorted after his death, in the same way Isa/Jesus (as) had his message distorted & was deified. We have to remember that according to the Quran and Ahadith, prophets and messengers were sent to every nation. Allah States that every people were sent a Messenger.
Read 11 tweets
21 Jul 20
AlhamdulilAllah. In a debate @exMoslemsInc was shown the statement of the great companion Ibn Abbas (ra) who believed in the death of Isa (as). @exMoslemsInc rejected the english text & wanted to see the arabic, when shown the arabic he completely ignored the statement & directed
the debate elsewhere instead of addressing the point of Ibn Abbas (ra). Anti ahmadis will never be able to debate from Quran/Hadith. They'll mock/abuse & ignore whatever evidence you show them. Since, @exMoslemsInc wasnt able to respond to the statement of Ibn Abbas (as) he lost
Regarding his new challenge. mawt means death. Mumeetuka is of the same root. It only means death. But he runs away by saying in their classical tafasir النوم أخو الموت (Sleep is the brother of death) so his claim is that Jesus was put to sleep. This claim is erroneous.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!