On Trump & platforms: A decision can be welcome and still illustrate problematic situation

3 Qs. 1) Consistent enforcement? Companies are often wildly inconsistent in when, where, who they enforce against. Decisions+timing come off as at best arbitrary at worst opportunistic 1/N
E.g. Why now, and not before (outgoing and not sitting president)? Why in the US and not elsewhere (India, Philippines)? Why jihadists but not white domestic terrorists (I have a guess)? Why do they almost all do it at the same time (that’s PR, not rules)?
2) Protection of fundamental rights? In absence of real oversight, the companies are making these decisions unilaterally. Often they do too little. Sometimes they do too much. There is no meaningful due process, and no way to ensure companies practice e.g. Santa Clara Principles.
Some of this is specifically US problem w/rigid public/private distinction in contemporary 1st amendment law. But due to the way companies operate it often in practice becomes a global one. Though perhaps we see beginning of horizontal application of fundamental rights in Europe?
3) Difference between platforms for speech and platforms for services, and between speech moderation and service moderation? While far from unprecedented (Wikileaks, Gab, pressure on Tumblr), the Amazon, Apple, Google decisions on Parler still strikes me as different from social.
Line btw speech and service platform not simple to draw but it is one thing to suspending account (Twitter) or individual posts (YouTube) vs removing Parler? Especially biggest and most powerful companies, both for speech and services, surely should have different obligations?
Wrote thread response to @courtneyr and repost it here.

Am most struck by how arbitrary+opaque decisions by powerful private companies remain - even when welcome - and how much more consistency, clear basis in fundamental rights, oversight I think we need
Oh, and two more @jilliancyork's "Everything pundits are getting wrong about this current moment in content moderation" jilliancyork.com/2021/01/10/eve… and @alexstamos reading list

Surprising nobody, blowhards have opinions on things about which they know nothing

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (is offline)

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (is offline) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rasmus_kleis

4 Dec 20
The @EU_Commission published its proposed European Democracy Action Plan yesterday.

One observation: disinformation parts are very focused on foreign interference and largely avoids recognizing domestic actors, in particular fact that misinformation often comes from the top 1/4 Image
Foreign interference is one important form of disinformation. But it is not the most widespread or necessarily most consequential.

HLG report stressed domestic actors, including politicians, in several places ec.europa.eu/digital-single…
It is clear few will touch this problem
2/4
We can dance arounds this all we will, but problem remain real, in EU too. Some things are clearly false, harmful, and malign. But often, what one person sees as destructive lies, others will see as political speech. Powerful actors like to avoid recognizing this complication 3/4
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec 20
So, yesterday the @EU_Commission published its action plan with proposals to "Support Recovery and Transformation" in European media, including news.

Sprawling plan for sprawling industry estimated at €193b/year, of which news publishers only a small part.

A few highlights 1/9 Image
One ambition is to foster investment by creating "MEDIA INVEST", with a target "to leverage investments of €400 million over a 7-year period" in hope of "making a significant contribution to addressing the gap in equity financing" (to help transform a €193b/year industry)

2/9
Also, more money for "Creative Europe programme" to €2.2b in 2021-2027 budget (so €300m/year), and "pending finalisation of negotiations, the programme will include for the first time actions focused on media freedom and pluralism, journalism, and media literacy." Exciting! 3/9
Read 10 tweets
4 Dec 20
Evidence, yes, but whose evidence & what evidence?

#COVID19 pandemic is accompanied by 'infodemic' and responding credibly+effectively is in part about media+communications

Yet media+communication research relatively absent from #COVID19 policy-making, I've told #WHEFEvents
1/4
There is much timely and relevant research, e.g. work of @Stephen_Cushion et al theconversation.com/coronavirus-fa…

As well as our work at @risj_oxford e.g. reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/communications…,

Yet it is not clear it is being recognized and used rasmuskleisnielsen.net/2020/05/22/com…

2/4
Many scientific fields have much to offer on #covid19

Given news is most widely used source of information about pandemic, media+communication research is arguably one of them

Yet e.g. seems no media+communications researchers among of 120+ SAGE and SPI-B members in the UK

3/4
Read 5 tweets
19 Nov 20
What is the public’s perspective on journalism and the pandemic?

Speaking at #MédiasenSeine based on our UK #COVID19 news and information project, with three lessons and a look to the future.

Underlying research here reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/UK-COVID-19-ne… 1/5
First lesson - our UK data suggests most people are informed, cautious, and willing to take further measures, in part thanks to journalism 2/5
Second lesson - in the UK, information inequality has grown throughout the crisis, around e.g. age, gender, class, as initial surge in news use dissipated. We don't have data on ethnicity but would expect similar pattern. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
19 Nov 20
Was asked to speak about how #covid19 is impacting business of news at #MédiasenSeine.

Our @risj_oxford research suggests pandemic is accelerating move to more digital, mobile, and platform-dominated environment where news capture only a small share of attention+advertising 1/5
Meanwhile, many have flocked to already big platforms during the crisis, making it even more important to look at competition issues - but publishers should remember the purpose of competition policy is to protect competition, not specific competitors reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/w… 2/5
And new policies will not in themselves change reality that news is small part of media use. comScore data suggests all news combined accounts for about 3% of time spent in France, and 5 biggest publishers account about half that – leaving 500+ with just a tiny sliver each. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
10 Nov 20
New work out on how #covid19 has impacted independent news media, by @fedecherubini @simgandi and me

Most report big loss of revenue, but sizable minority expect stable or growing revenues. So few winners, many losers (including citizens)

Report here reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/few-winners-ma… 1/4
We surveyed strategic sample of 165 independent news media through our networks and INERC members.

Most report audience growth, but also expect revenue deline, often very severe declines of 30% or more.

But 14% expect stable or growing revenues even during #covid19 crisis.

2/4
Due to how we did survey respondents over-represent non-profits, but still gives us a sense of the variable impact of the crisis.

Our data suggest-
*Big, ad-supported media hit hardest (esp. newspapers)
*Smaller, online-only often doing better (both commercial & non-profit) 3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!